330 likes | 468 Views
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF THE FEV 1 /FEV 6 TO DETECT AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION. Gaye Ulubay, Nursel Türkoğlu , Sevinç S. Ulaşlı, Şule Akçay, Füsun Ö. Eyüboğlu Baskent University Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Ankara.
E N D
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF THE FEV1/FEV6 TO DETECT AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION Gaye Ulubay, Nursel Türkoğlu, Sevinç S. Ulaşlı, Şule Akçay, Füsun Ö. Eyüboğlu Baskent University Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Ankara
FEV1/FEV6 was found to be an accurate and reliable alternative for the FEV1/FVC for diagnosing airway obstruction. Enright et al. Res Med, 2002;96:444-449. Swanney et al. AJRCCM 2000;162-917-919 ERS monograph, 2005;1-11 Vandevoorde et al. Chest 2005;127:1560-1564
WHY FEV6 ? • Easier for older patients and those with severe respiratory diseases. • FEV6 is more reproducible than FVC. • Shorter maneuvers reduce the risk of syncope. • In some studies specificity was close to FVC. Ferguson et al. Chest 2000;117:1146-1161 Swanney et al. AJRCCM 2000;162-917-919 Vandevoorde et al. Chest 2005;127:1560-1564.
PURPOSE • Evaluation of the relationship between FEV1/FVC and FEV1/FEV6 in diagnosis of airway obstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS-1 • The pulmonary function tests ( PFT ) results of all 1509 subjects tested between 2003-2005, were retrospectively analyzed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS-2 • Indications • Accurate diagnosis • Smoking status were ignored.
Exclusion Criteria • Subjects with no cooperation • < 10 years old and >80 years old were excluded from study. • Recent test results were taken from the subjects with repeated tests.
FVC maneuver was performed in accordance with ERS (European Respiratory Society) criteria. ERS 1993 update. Eur Respir J. 1993;6(suppl 16):5-40.
Airway obstruction was defined as FEV1/ FVC < 70%. • Classification of level of airway obstruction according to ERS. Siafakas et al, ERJ 1995,8:1398-1420
Statistical Methods • All analyses were performed using SPSS software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 9.05, SSPS Inc, Chicago, Ill, USA). • Lineer Regression Analysis • Spearman’s Correlation Analysis
n=495 obstruction n=497 n=200 no obstruction n=317 female male
Distribution of the Subjects According to Severity of the Airway Disease 9% 11% 15% 65% No obstruction Mild = FEV170 % Moderate = 50 % ≤-FEV1 < 70 % Severe = FEV1 < 50 % Mild Moderate Severe
PERCENT 80% 30% DECADES • I=10-20yr • II=21-40yr • III=41-60yr • IV=> 60yr No obstruction Obstruction IV II III I
In subjects with airway obstruction FEV1/FEV6 specificity 100 % sensitivity 78.3 % positive predictive value 100 % negative predictive value 90 %
FEV1/FEV6 did not detect obstruction in 10% of cases with FEV1/FVC< 70 .
When FEV1 decreased, rate of detected obstruction with FEV1/FEV6 increased.
This result was attributed to unexpired volume at sixth second in severely obstructed subjects.
FEV1/FEV6 according to age distribution Detecting airway obstruction with FEV1/FEV6 was not affected by age. P> 0.05
Specificity of FEV1/FEV6 in our study was similar with other studies but sensitivity was lower than other studies. • FEV1/FEV6 may be used in detecting airway obstruction in general population. Swanney et al. AJRCCM 2000;162-917-919 Vandevoorde et al. Chest 2005;127:1560-1564. Demir T. et al Res Med, 2005:99;103-106 Akpınar M et al. ERJ, 2006:27;374-377.
Lower sensitivity of FEV1/FEV6 in our study may be due to different numbers and distribution of obstructed subjects in other studies.
No difference among age decades in detecting airway obstruction was found. • Therefore FEV1/FEV6may be used in all subjects between 10-80 yrs old.
Underestimation of obstruction with FEV1/FEV6 in 10% of cases. • Disadvantage of FEV1/FEV6 .
FEV1/FEV6 use could be appropriate in primary care and field studies as a screening test.