440 likes | 552 Views
Theory and Hands On: Habitat Risk Assessment. Katie Arkema, Joey Bernhardt, Gregg Verutes. Goals for this session. Gain an understanding of science behind the model Understand the data you need to run the model and practice running it yourself
E N D
Theory and Hands On: Habitat Risk Assessment Katie Arkema, Joey Bernhardt, Gregg Verutes
Goals for this session • Gain an understanding of science behind the model • Understand the data you need to run the model and practice running it yourself • Share examples of how the model can be used to meet management and conservation goals
Habitats provide services Habitat for fisheries Recreational opportunities Storm protection
Risk to habitat structure and function Halpern et al 2008
Habitat Risk Scenarios Services
Questions the model can answer • Which habitats are most at risk and where? • What types of management options may be useful for reducing risk? • Where may human activities create trade-offs among environmental services by posing risk high enough to compromise habitat structure and function?
Final output • habitat risk • ecosystem risk
Related models and approaches Consequence HIGH RISK • Cumulative impact mapping (Halpern et al 2008) • InVEST Habitat Quality model • Risk assessment literature Exposure • Human health, safety engineering, oil, military, aerospace • Fisheries science
What do we mean by risk? Should I walk over the ice to my car? • Where is the ice in relation to my car and me? • Has the ground been sanded? • Is the ice just thin and patchy or more dangerous? • If I fall, how bad will my injury be? • Am I young and resilient or old? Will I break an arm or leg? • Am I wearing high heels or snow boots?
Criteria Patrick et al 2010, Hobday et al. 2007
Criteria Ratings Patrick et al 2010, Hobday et al. XXX Patrick et al 2010, Hobday et al 2007
Criteria Ratings • Weighted average • data quality • importance • Weighted average • data quality • importance
Outputs – Risk mapsWhere is risk highest? • cumulative • habitat risk • ecosystem risk
Outputs - Risk hotspotsWhere may services provided by habitats be compromised in the future? RISK TOCORALS RISK TOMANGROVES RISK TOSEAGRASS Habitat Risk Assessment Low Medium High
Outputs – Risk plotsStrategies for reducing risk Intensive intervention: if this area overlaps with high benefits, then limit damaging uses and restore here Monitor and prepare for climate stressors etc. HIGH RISK Consequence (endogenous: regeneration, connectivity etc) Develop uses here Low intensity intervention LOW RISK EXPOSURE (exogenous: management, intensity, timing etc)
Applications • Belize – coastal zone management plan • WCVI – site activities, trade-offs among services
Coastal zone management plan for Belize Consequence HIGH RISK Stakeholder, local scientists and government officials EXPOSURE Fisheries Coastal protection Tourism opportunities • Draft zoning plans • current uses • future uses • stakeholder engagement • reports • Risk to habitats • coral • mangroves • seagrass
Outputs - Risk hotspotsWhere may services provided by habitats be compromised in the future? High RiskArea (km2) 98.70 6.44 56.10 RISK TOSEAGRASS Habitat Risk Assessment Low Medium High
Crop Pollination Water Purification Marine Water Quality Aquaculture Renewable Energy Managed Timber Production Reservoir Hydropower Production Habitat Risk Assessment; Biodiversity Coastal Vulnerability AestheticQuality Sediment Retention Groundwater Recharge Coastal Protection Recreation InVEST Models & Linkages Agricultural Production Flood Risk Mitigation Fisheries (including recreational) Overlap Analysis Carbon Storage& Sequestration (Blue Carbon) Terrestrial/freshwater model: Tier 1 supporting service Optional model linkage, no sequencing Terrestrial/freshwater model: Tier 1 that quantifies service Required/optional model linkage, sequencing needed Marine model: Tier 1 supporting service Marine model: Tier 1 that quantifies service Marine model: Tier 0 Model coming soon!
Data requirements • Shapefiles for all habitats • Shapefiles for all stressors • Criteria rating table
You have a risk map! Now what? Future Ecosystem Risk (cumulative risk to all habitats)
1. 2. 3. Which stressors pose the greatest risk? Where are the risk hotspots? Where will there be trade-offs among activities?
1. 2. 3. Which stressors pose the greatest risk? Where are the risk hotspots? Where will there be trade-offs among activities?
Sketch out possible futures New resort Eelgrass restoration New clearcuts New shellfish tenures Eelgrass restoration Recreation and tourism Forestry Shellfish harvest
Shellfish harvest, tourism Habitat extent Effects on other services that depend on healthy habitats?
Trade-offs among services Future Ecosystem Risk (cumulative risk to all habitats)
Identify unexpected consequences and trade-offs Population centers Macoah
Now you know where the risk hotspots are, and which stressors are driving them…how can you prioritize your management?
Intensive intervention: limit damaging uses and restore here, esp. if overlap with important benefits Monitor and prepare for climate stressors etc. CONSEQUENCE (endogenous: regeneration, connectivity etc) Develop uses here LOW RISK Low intensity intervention EXPOSURE (exogenous: management, intensity, timing etc)
Space matters: reduce incompatibilities by shifting activities in space Restore eelgrass in high risk, high benefit locations Move shellfish tenures away from population centers
Take-away messages • InVEST HRA can: • Screen the risk of current and future stressors. • Prioritize management where it’s most needed and effective. • Identify trade-offs among ecosystem services.
Future directions • Ability to modify criteria • Functionality to calculate habitat connectivity • Spatial variation in criteria – esp. intensity, management effectiveness • Expand sample data • Other ideas?
Acknowledgements Marine Team Greg Guannel, Anne Guerry, Mary Ruckelshaus, Jess Silver, Jodie Toft, Spencer Wood