1 / 1

Effective theory description of weak annihilation effects in B X u l n

J.J. Sanz-Cillero IPN-Orsay. Effective theory description of weak annihilation effects in B X u l n. BEACH 06 Lancaster, July 2 nd -8 th 2006. ( In collaboration with G. Paz; PRELIMINAR) Special thanks to M. Neubert. Dominant decay. Operator Product Expansion:. W. l.

hedia
Download Presentation

Effective theory description of weak annihilation effects in B X u l n

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. J.J. Sanz-Cillero IPN-Orsay Effective theory description of weak annihilation effects in BXu l n BEACH 06 Lancaster, July 2nd-8th 2006 ( In collaboration with G. Paz; PRELIMINAR) Special thanks to M. Neubert Dominant decay • Operator Product Expansion: W l • B2u=B1u=1, B2d,s=B1d,s=0, in the factorization limit • Expected 10% deviations • Dependence on light quark in Bq n Bq N3LO in 1/mb Xu Weak Annihilation (WA) WA amplitude • Low EH effect [Bigi & Uraltse’94] • N3LO in 1/mb : O(1/mb3) suppression • NLO in 1/NC • Related to production of chiral singlets • Difference between B+ - B0 rates W l • Constant N3LO Weak-Annihilation effect: n Bu+ Xu [ Voloshin’01 ] I=Y=0 (chiral singlet) HMcPT in BP l n Chiral limit + Large NC limit mP=0 Isolation of WA effects + Removal of BXC l n background: Hadronic energy cut-off EXu<Lcut<MD • Large NC + HM •  Amplitudes given by the tree-level exchange of the B* 1 1 1/2 + 1/6 + 1/3 1 h0 h8 p+ K+ p0 • CORRECTIONS: • Couplings • Masses “Mild” corrections, under control Bd0 Bs0 Bu+ mp2 = B0 (mu+md) mh02 Quark masses 1/NCcontributions to the h0 mass Kinematical enhancement (mP/Lcut)2 1 (chiral limit) COMBINATION OF EXPANSIONS with • 1/NC large NC • (mP/Lc)2 cPT expansion in mu,d,s • QCD/MB 1/mb expansion • cut/MB 1/mb expansion + cut-off • (mP/Lcut)2 cut-off (kinematical) • Dominance of one particle production: • BP l n (P=p,K,h8,h0) • (dominant up to EXu ~ 1 GeV) • BV l n (V=r,K*,w,f) • (relevant beyond EXu ~ 1 GeV) • Suppression of two-particle production: • Bppln suppressed with respect to Bp l n with …and also available the leptonic energy spectrum with the cut EXu<Lcut Under control In addition, it is noticed the importance of … SU(3)-breaking effects at NC∞ WA effects at mq0 • Difference between Bd0-Bs0: • Difference between B0-B+ (WA) • 1/MB3 suppression (fB2~ 1/MB) • (mK2–mp2) suppression • 1/MB3 suppression (fB2~ 1/MB) • 1/NC suppression EH=1.25 GeV EH=1.25 GeV for EH<1.25 GeV PRELIMINAR PRELIMINAR • The analysis in terms of the leptonic energy spectrumis also available Conclusions • OUT-LOOK: • Contribution from B->V l nu (accuracy) • Study of double-pole expressions (removal of the residual log(e) dependence) • Importance in D decays • EFT explanation of WA effects from OPE • Revisited estimate of WA • Importance of SU(3) breaking effects (similar to WA) • Need of higher precision on fB and g

More Related