1 / 22

Critical Perspectives

Critical Perspectives. A Doll’s House Henrik Ibsen. READING CRITICALLY. No view of the text is dominant Coupling close reading with an informed understanding of key ideas, related texts and background information. EARLY CRITICS. Early responses focused on the play’s ending

hedwig
Download Presentation

Critical Perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Critical Perspectives A Doll’s House Henrik Ibsen

  2. READING CRITICALLY • No view of the text is dominant • Coupling close reading with an informed understanding of key ideas, related texts and background information

  3. EARLY CRITICS • Early responses focused on the play’s ending • Representation of the ending as: • Unrealistic [M. W Burn] • A dramatic flaw [F. Petersen]

  4. EARLY CRITICS • Germany – Ibsen pressured into writing a happy ending • “Loving the repulsive” • “Illogical and immoral” • “Our own life, our own everyday life, has here been placed on stage and condemned!”

  5. VICTORIAN ENGLAND “IBSEN IN BRIXTON” CARTOON PUNCH 1891

  6. “How TorvaldHelmer could by any possiblity have treated his restless, illogical, fractious, and babyish little wife otherwise than he did; why Nora should ever adore with such abandonment and passion wthis conceited prig… are points that… require a considerable amount of argument… to convince the common-sense playgoer.” (C. Scott, Daily Telegraph, 8 June 1889) VICTORIAN ENGLAND “beware of confounding the feelings of men who look to them for nothing better than pleasant sensations and mental distractions, with the feelings of men who look to them to raise their ideal of mental and moral grace and beauty.” (Spectator, 1989).

  7. VICTORIAN ENGLAND The Quintessence of Ibsenism (G. Bernard, 1891) … “sharpshooting at the audience…we are not flattered spectators killing the idle hour with an ingenious and amusing entertainment: we are ‘guilty creatures sitting at a play’”…

  8. Naturalism – Ibsen came to be known for it Ibsen’s naturalism had been necessary at the time in order to show the psychological and political limitation of bourgeois domestic life, it was a stage the theatre needed to outgrow. LATER CRITICS

  9. Ibsen is not naturalistic enough The relationship of Ibsen’s plays – and A Doll’s House in particular – to notions of theatricality and performance is precisely what makes them interesting Ibsen as a pioneer of modernism…an “invitiation to reflect on the nature of theatre” LATER CRITICS

  10. LATER CRITICS The interpreters of Nora – an essential dimension to understanding of how different generations have understood Ibsen.

  11. SIGNS & SEMIOTICS • Semiotics is the study of signs. • Sign Systems • Convey meaning between people • Gestures • Clothing • Codes of manners

  12. SIGNS & SEMIOTICS • Names are most obviously arbitrary labels of all • Helmer – Nora prefers his first name • Helmer considers use of his first name to be on a friendship level, hence his anger towards Krogstad’s informality

  13. The Christmas Tree • Christian ideals • Festivity and fun • Nora’s state of being • Clothing • Tension • Door Slam SIGNS & SEMIOTICS

  14. MARXIST CRITICISM For Brecht, a play that allowed the audience to become absorbed in the action as if they were watching real life was in danger of lulling them into accepting the society shown in the play instead of wanting to change it.

  15. The current preoccupation of Marxist criticism is with what a text does not say – because the text itself has been produced on a set of assumptions about the world seen as ‘natural’ by author and audience alike. • Whose story does this tell? • Is it told at the expense of lower economic groups? MARXIST CRITICISM

  16. Nora and MrsLinde as commodities • Nora as a reward • Nora as a pet / possession • MrsLinde as an object of exchange MARXIST CRITICISM

  17. Nora challenges her world • She is no longer an object • Who is right? MARXIST CRITICISM

  18. GENDERED CRITICISM A Doll’s House remains one of the most powerful refutations ever written of the theory of separate spheres which underpinned nineteenth-century society – the idea that men and women belonged in the workplace and the home respectively.

  19. GENDERED CRITICISM • Gender is performative • Gender is not something we are • Gender is something we do • Gender roles are apparent even within costumes

  20. Nora and Helmer - Gender stereotypes • Nora • Submissive • Flattering of her husband • Seeing work as beyond her due to intellect • Helmer • Is attracted to her helplessness • Acts as protector GENDERED CRITICISM

  21. Critical Perspectives Early Critics Victorian England Later Critics Contemporary Approaches • Signs and Semiotics • Marxist Criticism • Gendered Criticism Sourced from York Notes Advanced – A Doll’s House, by Frances Gray, York Press, London 2008

More Related