150 likes | 277 Views
Follow-up Annual Update Online Submission Process Survey Results 2010-2011. See How Faculty/Staff Rate the AUP Submission. I am a member of the followin g college. I felt the presentation on the new BlackBoard submission process given at my college senate meeting was helpful.
E N D
Follow-up Annual Update Online Submission Process Survey Results 2010-2011 See How Faculty/Staff Rate the AUP Submission
I felt the presentation on the new BlackBoard submission process given at my college senate meeting was helpful
I felt that the powerpoint slides provided were sufficient training materials
I felt adequate training was provide to assist me in learning the new submission process
If I could change one thing in regards to the training process it would be: • “Ensure the powerpoint slides match what actually occurs.” • “Make the entry process more user friendly so training is not necessary.” • “I received no training and figured it out just fine.”
The submission process in BlackBoard was more efficient than the old hard copy process.
After receiving training and/or reviewing the powerpoint slides, the submission process was easy to complete
The workflow process in BlackBoard provided an effective way to supply chair/dean approval
If I could change one thing in regards to the submission process it would be: • “The workflow process should be triple checked to ensure the correct emails are in the system.” • “Workflow was difficult and confusing.” • “Better identification of the programs would be helpful.”
I am familiar with my college’s Excel dashboard file on BlackBoard.
I believe the dashboard allows for greater assessment transparency and visibility within my department
The dashboard will assist me during program accreditation processes
If I could change one thing in regards to the dashboard file it would be: • No comments received.
THANK YOU! • Thank you for viewing the Annual Update Submission Process survey feedback results! • If you have any comments please email us at: assess@niu.edu