280 likes | 416 Views
Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations. Barry Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Midwest Field Office 312.353-9286 barry.kaplan@usdoj.gov. What is Antitrust?. The Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §1).
E N D
Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Barry Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Midwest Field Office 312.353-9286 barry.kaplan@usdoj.gov
The Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §1) • “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.” • Prohibits agreements among competitors in restraint of trade or commerce • Price fixing, market allocation and bid rigging are all criminal violations
Elements of an Offense • Concerted action in the restraint of trade – i.e., an agreement among competitors • Between two or more independent entities • Affecting interstate or foreign commerce
Bid Rigging • Agreement in advance to manipulate outcome of bidding process • Types: • Bid Suppression • Complementary Bidding • Bid Rotation
What do you think the penalties are for Sherman Act violations?
It's risky, of course---if we're caught, it could mean many hours of community service.
Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement Act of 2004 • Increased maximum criminal penalties: • Individuals- 10 years and/or $1,000,000; • Corporations- $100 Million • Alternative fine provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3571 • Twice the gross financial loss or gain resulting from the violation where this number would exceed $100 Million.
Companion Violations • Bribery/Gratuities (18 U.S.C § 201) • False & Fictitious Claims (18 U.S.C. § 287) • Conspiracy to Defraud U.S. (18 U.S.C. § 371) • False Statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) • Mail/Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343) • Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1519)
Why am I here? $819,000,000,000
NO PRESSURE Risk Management “Agencies must immediately review the risk framework . . . and initiate risk mitigation strategies.”
4 Agreement 3 Opportunity 2 Means 1 Motive Evolution of Collusion
BATTLING BID RIGGINGSee the Signs • Market • Application • Patterns • Suspicious Behavior
Market: Are Conditions Conducive to Collusion? • No readily available substitutes • The product is standardized • Vendors repeatedly sell to the same buyers • Competitors in an industry frequently interact • Bidders personally submit bids at the same physical location
APPLICATION:The Dumb Crook • Similar applications – handwriting; typeface; stationery • Last-minute changes – white-outs or physical alterations to prices • Vendor picks up an extra bid package for another vendor OR submits a competing vendor’s bid
Paper v. Electronic • Same basic fraudulent conduct • Other M.A.P.S. factors to look for: • Metadata (hidden data) • Cover e-mail header info. incorrect • Same math errors, typos, etc.
Metadata Can be Revealing:
Patterns in Bids or Prices • The vendors take turns as the winning bidder (bid rotation) • The winner subcontracts work to losers • It all evens out • The same guys always win (or lose) • Bids are unusually high • Fewer than normal number of bidders
PATTERNS:Bid Rotation • Bid 1: Company A wins • Bid 2: Company B wins • Bid 3: Company C wins • Bid 4: Company A wins • Bid 5: Company B wins • Bid 6: Company C wins
PATTERNS:Bid Suppression • Bid 1: Companies A, B, C, and D bid • Bid 2: Companies B, C, and D bid • Bid 3: Companies A, C, and D bid • Bid 4: Companies A, B, and D bid • Bid 5: Companies A, B, and C bid Also watch for subcontracts to the company that sits out!
PATTERNS:Who Is Getting What • Bid 1: A wins a $3 million contract • Bid 2: B wins a $5 million contract • Bid 3: C wins a $1 million contract • Bid 4: C wins a $4 million contract • Bid 5: A wins a $2 million contract Everyone = $5 million
SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR:Itching to Get Caught • No Chance Bidder – Bids submitted by vendor known to lack the ability to perform • Betting Bidder – Vendor brings multiple bids to an opening or submits bid once other bidders are determined • Loud Mouth Bidder – Suspicious statements
Detecting Bidding Fraud – Best Practices Examine the bid files for: • Incomplete files • Irregularities • Same phrasing • Same return address • Same price calculations or errors
PARTING WORDS • Remember M.A.P.S. • Err on the side of reporting suspicions • We are here to assist you • Barry Kaplan • U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division • Midwest Field Office • 312.353-9286 • barry.kaplan@usdoj.gov