1 / 26

Introduction

Rethinking EU Trade Procedures -- The Beer Living Lab International Journal of E-market Ziv Baida, Boriana Rukanova, Jianwei Liu and Yao-Hua Tan Vrije University Amsterdam. Introduction. Dilemma of European governments to increase security and control;

helia
Download Presentation

Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rethinking EU Trade Procedures -- The Beer Living LabInternational Journal of E-marketZiv Baida, Boriana Rukanova, Jianwei Liu and Yao-Hua TanVrije University Amsterdam Jianwei Liu

  2. Introduction • Dilemma of European governments • to increase security and control; • to reduce the administrative burden for businesses • Difficulties • Most government procedures are paper based and not harmonized; • Safety & security vs. economic benefit • Trade procedures redesign requirements • Solutions for the dilemma • Everything is till in control ( government & business perspective) • Need for Customs procedure redesign approach Jianwei Liu

  3. Project Overview ITAIDE: IT adoption and intelligent design for e-government • Develop innovative solutions that support the EU's secure and competitive cross-border trade • Create a new governance model for G2B collaboration

  4. Objectives of our research Methodology for control procedures (re)design Library of Control Templates (control ontology) Supporting tool for control procedure design (e3-control) Framework for secure supply chain governance What are the major concerns for securing supply chains? How to audit IS for security purpose? Study of the AEO concept, the auditing approach and tool support Jianwei Liu

  5. Theoretical Framework: e3-control Methodology for control procedures (re-)design Conceptual modelling approach Theoretical basis: Auditing & accounting literature Business modelling Two abstraction levels Exchange of values among actors Purpose of control: safeguard value Limit scope of analysis Profitability Processes that realize the above Control mechanisms 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  6. e3-control development 2005 Value perspective on control:e3-value Learn where value can be lost No operational solution 2006 Control is a process-level issue; extend e3-control into process perspective Mid 2006 Patterns of operational control problems and solutions Late 2006 AAD approach (process perspective based on accounting and auditing literature) 2007- Further develop AAD and validate it via LL case studies Introduce the idea of information asymmetry for sloving control problems from higher level of partner selection and screening. 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  7. e3-control: in a nutshell Design initial business model in an ideal situation. To find out critical value transfers and involved actors How current controls are applied to safeguard these values transfers, and identify flaws in the current situation Add/change control mechanisms according to auditing and accounting control principles Evaluate the new business model from a value perspective, to investigate financial feasibility. Jianwei Liu

  8. E3 control Value perspective Open issue Process perspective Value perspective Vs. process perspective Why Value? 1.Value as abstract specification of control 2.Value perspective is natural concept from TCE. Value facilitates a cost-benefit analysis of control mechanism. 3.Value objects as instruments of control procedure ( e.g., Bill of lading) 4.Control mech. as a value service (e.g., Letter of credit) Why Process? 1. Control is clearly defined as a process issue (COSO 1992). 2. The existing knowledge base of control assumes a process perspective. 3. The process perspective is more natural for domain experts than the value perspective. 4. The two perspectives address different issues, both of which are required. Parallel development of e3 control combining both perspectives is needed! Jianwei Liu

  9. AAD: an introduction (1) AAD is a process based approach to apply control principles with respect to actors, activities and documents. Actor:(Who are the interested and responsible parties) Responsible actor Evidencing actor Control actor Activity:(What are they doing? are there separation of duties) Operational activity Evidencing activity Control activity Document:(What they issue to serve as sufficient audit trial?) To-be verified document Supporting document Verified document 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  10. AAD control principles If an Operational activity exists, its corresponding Control activity must exist as well and should always follow the Operational activity. If a Control actor cannot directly witness the execution of the Operational activity, the Evidencing (witnessing) activity should be delegated to an Evidencing actor (trusted third party) If an Evidencing (witnessing) activity exists, it must be furnished by Supporting documents. These Supporting documents should be the results of an Evidencing (witnessing) activity that directly witnesses the Operational activity. Supporting documents used by the Control activity should be transferred directly from the Evidencing actor to the Control actor. The Evidencing actor who generates Supporting documents should be independent of the responsible actor who generates the To-be-verified document. An Operational activity and its corresponding Control activity should be segregated into two different positions and done by two different actors. The actors responsible for the Operational activity and its corresponding Control activity (respectively, Responsible actor and Control actor) should be socially detached. 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  11. AAD: an introduction (2) AAD control model AAD control principles with checking list 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  12. The case: Customs procedure redesign in the beer industry Case description: Export of beer from the Netherlands to the UK A Dutch beer producer can export beer to the UK without paying excise in the Netherlands. To obtain such exemption, the Dutch beer producer needs to prove that it has indeed exported the beer outside the country. The current solution - paper based Administrative Accompanying Document (AAD) Two roles of the AAD-doc --- Signed by EW and UK Customs as a proof of exporting for excise exemption --- “Stop” function when cargos are stopped and checked en route. The traditional procedure needs to be redesigned Too much time/energy consuming No real time & effective control AAD - doc is easy to be falsified 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  13. Case study with e3- control: BLL Sub-ideal situation (fraud) Supporting Doc. Problematic process Evidencing Doc. 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  14. Step 1: Preliminary Analysis (value perspective) 1.5 Bil./y “Black market”:BeerCo NL ships excisable beer to UK accompanied with an AAD-doc, but BeerCo NL colludes with a local retailer. The goods disappear in the black market without excise payment. Customs will not receive AAD-doc for the goods. If lucky (5%) this fraud will be discovered by Dutch Customs but too late (after 3 months). 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  15. Step 1: Preliminary Analysis (cont.) • Inputs: interviews and workshop with domain experts; documentation on the relevant actors, their goals and their activities • Outputs: understanding of the logic behind the business network; value model(s); understanding of possible violations of value model(s); prioritization of violations, being control problems (including a decision to focus on specific control problems)

  16. Step 2: Identify Control Problems (Process) Control problems: Violates control principles 3 and 5. The supporting document (AAD-doc) is not transferred directly from the evidencing actor (EW/Customs UK) to the control actor (Customs NL) Checking AAD-docs is often not done. Efficiency flaw: Redundant information create high operational costs for businesses and governments. Problematic process 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  17. Step 2: Identify Control Problems (cont.) • Inputs: a set of violations of value models to focus on; interviews and workshop with domain experts; documentation on the business processes; • Outputs: process models of the processes that realize the earlier defined focal value-level control problems; set of process-level control problems; abstract suggestions for control solutions

  18. Step 3: Redesign --- Innovative IT TREC: Tamper-Resistant Embedded Controller (IBM) Sends container status information in real time (location, temperature, opening attempts etc.) Secured access to a container (Public Key Cryptography) Enables link to the data base of a company (shipper, carrier) EPCIS ERP 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  19. BLL SOA based information sharing schema Step 3. Redesign---Innovative procedures 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  20. Step 3 Cont.: Customs control process with TREC Supporting Doc. AEO (Authorized economic operater) 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  21. Step 3. Redesign (cont.) • Inputs: process models for the focal value-level control problems; set of process-level control problems; abstract suggestions for control solutions; interviews and workshops with domain experts; documentation on business processes. • Outputs: concrete solutions for earlier-defined control problems; process models that realize these solutions.

  22. Step 4: Evaluation (value perspective) • BeerCo: better supply chain management; lower administrative burden; decrease loss from theft and smuggling or lost container • Customs NL: better excise payment control; increase tax revenue • Customs UK: better excise payment control; increase tax revenue; enhance security • The new actor – TREC provider: increase profit through charging from the services. 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  23. Step 4. Evaluation (cont.) • Inputs: value models of the initial situation (output of step 1); concrete solutions for earlier-defined control problems (output of step 3); interviews and workshops with domain experts. • Outputs: understanding of the logic behind the new business network and of how the network changed due to the introduction of new procedures; value model(s) of the new business network (or networks, in case of multiple scenarios analysis); e3-value profitability sheets being a financial business model evaluation (this is still an ongoing task in the BeerLL).

  24. Case study with e3- control: PLL (Green corridor) G2B partnership G2G collaboration Reversing order GC partner certification 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

  25. Future research development Develop secure supply chain governance model • Find out major concerns for secure supply chain governance • Role of IT • extract auditors’ decision model in their auditing procedures • E.g. Risk Assessment • Knowledge elicitation research • Integrate governance model in e3-control • Investigate software tool support for AEO assessment • Tool supports companies to do AEO self-assessment • Examples: • Deloitte AEO Digiscan tool • FoodLL and DrugLL customs procedure redesign • Apply e3-control in redesigning the FoodLL and DrugLL Customs procedures Jianwei Liu

  26. Further Info. Jianwei Liu jliu@feweb.vu.nl Vrije University Amsterdam 25/05/2008 Jianwei Liu (VU), jliu@feweb.vu.nl

More Related