1 / 16

Acknowledgements : Jun Li (CIMMS/SSEC, UW-Madison) JCSDA NOAA NESDIS/GOES-R

heman
Download Presentation

Acknowledgements : Jun Li (CIMMS/SSEC, UW-Madison) JCSDA NOAA NESDIS/GOES-R

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The 10th JCSDA Workshop on Satellite Data Assimilation,October 10-12, 2012, NCWCP, College Park, MD Regional Data AssimilationUtility of GOES-R instruments for hurricane data assimilationMilija Zupanski1, Man Zhang1, Karina Apodaca1, Louie Grasso1, John Knaff21 Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere2NOAA/STAR/RAMMBColorado State UniversityFort Collins, Colorado, U. S. A.[ http://www.cira.colostate.edu/projects/ensemble/ ] • Acknowledgements: • Jun Li (CIMMS/SSEC, UW-Madison) • JCSDA • NOAA NESDIS/GOES-R

  2. Goals of the project • Examine the utility of the GOES-R ABI and GLM instruments for hurricane inner-core assimilation and prediction • Enhance the system by adding full spatial resolution advanced IR sounding product (in collaboration with Jun Li, CIMSS) • Use NOAA operational codes and scripts: • Benchmark system incorporates NCEP operational observations and modeling systems • - NOAA HWRF (NMM) • - GSI, CRTM • - Hybrid variational-ensemble DA system (MLEF-Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter) • Enhanced system can include additional assimilation of: • - All-sky SEVIRI IR radiances (proxy for ABI) • - WWLLN lightning flash rate (proxy for GLM) • - Vertical profiles of T and Q (AIRS, IASI) • - Assimilation of all-sky MW radiances (AMSU-A)

  3. Time schedule • Tasks: • Year 1 (2011): Initial development and evaluation of the regional HWRF DA system • Interface the MLEF-HWRF system with MSG SEVIRI observations as proxy for GOES-R ABI. • Make initial evaluation of the system by comparing assimilation/forecast results with and without MSG SEVIRI data in application to tropical cyclones (TC). • Develop the full spatial resolution advanced sounding product in clear and some cloudy skies (e.g., thin cloud and low clod situations) and error characterization. • Add capability to assimilate all-sky MW radiances (AMSU-A) • Year 2 (2012): Combine all components, with exception of lightning data • Combine all components into a single ensemble-based data assimilation system and conduct benchmark experiments (without lightning data). • Evaluate the impact of GOES-R ABI proxy data in TC application. • Evaluate the impact of IR sounder proxy data in clear skies in TC application. • Year 3 (2013): Lightning data and final evaluation • Include lightning data in the MLEF-HWRF system. • Include advanced IR sounding product in cloudy region, evaluate the impact of full spatial resolution cloudy soundings. • Conduct a thorough evaluation of the value-added impact of lightning data in TC data assimilation applications.

  4. HWRF Model Ensemble + Control Prediction step xf ; Pf Observation Transformation Operator Ensemble + Control MINIMIZATION Analysis step CONTROL VARIABLE UPDATE xa; Pa DA cycles MLEF-HWRF FLOW DIAGRAM - GSI observations - GOES-R ABI all-sky radiances - GOES-R GLM lightning - AIRS/IASI advanced IR sounding profiles MLEF: 1- iterative minimization of a cost function is applied to obtain a nonlinear solution to data assimilation problem 2- flow-dependent error covariance estimation Iterations

  5. MLEF-HWRF code organization Modular structure: - HWRF, GSI, and MLEF are independent modular components - it allows straightforward updating of each component without affecting other system components HWRF-MLEF interface HWRF model HWRF ensemble MLEF Forward GSI/CRTM operator GSI/CRTM-MLEFinterface GSI/CRTM ensemble • New observations included through GSI/CRTM • - BUFR read, interpolate, transform, quality control • Required MLEF module in GSI (e.g., to create forward) • HWRF used without any change

  6. Forecast error covariance in hurricane inner core • Forecast error covariance is fundamental for data assimilation • Complex, flow-dependent inter-variable correlations Correlations between DYNAMICAL variables Correlations between MICROPHYSICAL variables Cross-correlations between DYNAMICAL (pd, t, q, u, v) and MICROPHYSICAL (e.g., cwm, qice, qcld, qgrp, qrain, qsnow) variables • Unknown correlations among microphysical variables and between dynamical and microphysical variables • Principal advantage for hybrid and ensemble-based data assimilation since previous knowledge of correlations is not required, being produced by HWRF ensemble forecasts • Fundamentally important to have a “good” estimate of forecast error covariance since in DA all observation increment are projected onto that subspace

  7. HWRF-MLEF Pf auto-correlationssingle observation of specific humidity at 850 hPa Hurricane Gustav (2008) – HWRF moving nest at 9 km resolution HWRF-MLEF analysis response Vertical cross-section of Q analysis Q analysis at 850 hPa X The results are valid for hurricane Gustav (2008) at 1200 UTC on August 31, 2008. The cross denotes the location of observation and vertical response is plotted along the dashed line (26.75 N). Well-defined, localized analysis response

  8. HWRF-MLEF Pfcross-correlationssingle observation of specific humidity at 850 hPa Hurricane Gustav (2008) – HWRF moving nest at 9 km resolution HWRF-MLEF analysis response Vertical cross-section of U-wind analysis PD (=ps-pt) analysis X The results are valid for hurricane Gustav (2008) at 1200 UTC on August 31, 2008. The cross denotes the location of observation and vertical response is plotted along the dashed line. An increase of specific humidity implies a reduction of surface pressure and a stronger convergence/vortex near the center of hurricane

  9. Satellite observation information using Shannon information measures Use Shannon information theory (e.g. entropy) as an objective, pdf-based quantification of information (Rodgers 2000; Zupanski et al. 2007) Entropy Change of entropy due to observations • Gaussian pdf greatly reduce the complexity since entropy is related to covariance Change of entropy / degrees of freedom for signal (DFS) In ensemble DA methods DFS can be computed exactlyin ensemble subspace: Since eigenvalues of the matrix ZTZ are known and the matrix inversion is defined in ensemble space, the flow-dependent DFS can be computed

  10. Experimental setup • Data assimilation setup: • NOAA Hurricane WRF(NMM) model at 27km / 9km resolution • Moving nest • Use MLEF as a prototype HVEDAS • 32 ensembles • 6-hour assimilation interval • Control variables: PD, T, Q, U, V, CWM • Benchmark system observations: • NOAA operational observations using GSI and CRTM forward operators • Enhanced system observations: • All-sky AMSU-A radiances: use the approach originally developed by M.-J. Kim for global DA system, adapted by M. Zhang for use in regional DA system and for hurricanes • All-sky MSG SEVIRI IR radiances (proxy for GOES-R ABI) • AIRS, IASI vertical profiles of temperature and specific humidity • Focus on the hurricane inner core (moving nest at 9 km resolution) Additional details presented on the poster by Man Zhang et al.

  11. Assimilation of all-sky MSG SEVIRI Ch9 – 10.8 mm:HWRF inner domain • Hurricane Fred (2010) • 10 km data thinning SEVIRI Tb before and after thinning Information content - DFS CWM analysis increment • Loss of data due to thinning used in GSI • - need to enhance data usage and improve quality control • Positive impact on the analysis in the center of TC

  12. Assimilation of all-sky MSG SEVIRI and AIRS SFOV (q, T):HWRF inner domain • Hurricane Fred (2010) • No data thinning for SFOV profiles CWM analysis increment Information content - DFS MSG SEVIRI and AIRS SFOV q profile only MSG SEVIRI and AIRS SFOV T profile only • Analysis increment for clouds (cwm) benefits more from q data than from T data • Need to examine relative impact for cloudy profiles of q and T

  13. Assimilation of all-sky MSG SEVIRI and AIRS SFOV (q, T): HWRF outer domain • Hurricane Fred (2010) • No data thinning for SFOV profiles Information content - DFS MSG SEVIRI and AIRS q profile MSG SEVIRI and AIRS T profile MSG SEVIRI only In outer domain (with less clouds) DFS shows more benefit from AIRS SFOV T data than from q data

  14. Assimilation of WWLLN lightning flash rates (GOES-R GLM proxy): Preparation for next year • Two main approaches for observation operator: • Use maximum vertical velocity as an input to regression equation • - sensitivity of dynamical control variables (pd, T, q, u, v) important for dynamically balanced impact on the analysis and forecast • Use cloud hydrometeor-based lightning observation operator (McCaul et al. 2009) • - relevance of graupel flux and vertically integrated cloud ice for lightning assimilation. • - still possible to maintain sensitivity to dynamical control variables Preliminary results: Assimilation of WWLLN lightning observations using WRF-NMM Information content Forecast RMS error • Information content shows the utility of lightning observations in the analysis • 6-hour WRF-NMM forecast improved due to lightning observations

  15. Summary • HWRF, GSI/CRTM and MLEF combined in a prototype regional HVEDAS • Assimilation of all-sky MSG SEVIRI IR radiances • Assimilation of advanced IR sounding products • Preliminary results encouraging • Need improvements in data selection, quality control • Preliminary development of lightning data assimilation encouraging in WRF-NMM Future Work • Include lightning data in the MLEF-HWRF system. • Include assimilation of advanced IR sounding product in cloudy regions • Conduct a thorough evaluation of the value-added impact of lightning data in regional hurricane data assimilation applications • Demonstrate the utility of GOES-R ABI and GLM, and advanced IR soundings in regional hurricane DA

  16. Additional details and publications from this project Apodaca, K., M. Zupanski, M. Zhang, M. DeMaria, L. D. Grasso, J. A. Knaff, and G. DeMaria:Evaluating the potential impact of assimilating GOES-R GLM satellite lightning observations. To be submitted to Mon. Wea. Rev. Zhang, M., M. Zupanski, M.-J. Kim, and J. Knaff, 2012: Direct Assimilation of all-sky AMSU-A Radiances in TC inner core: Hurricane Danielle (2010). Mon. Wea. Rev., in review. Zupanski M., 2012: All-sky satellite radiance data assimilation: Methodology and Challenges. Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Hydrologic Applications, S.-K. Park and L. Xu, Eds, Springer-Verlag Berlin, in print. Also, see the poster “Investigating the effects of GOES-R measurements and advanced infrared soundings for hurricane core region data assimilation using a hybrid data assimilation system” by Man Zhang et al.

More Related