220 likes | 364 Views
Using Molecular Analysis to Examine the Phylogeny of Symbiotic Water Mites in Two Subgenera: Unionicoloides and Parasitax. Dan Deatherage Kevin Myers September 3,2004. Background. Symbiotic water mites Mussels provide hosts to mites Size requires molecular techniques
E N D
Using Molecular Analysis to Examine the Phylogeny of Symbiotic Water Mites in Two Subgenera:Unionicoloides and Parasitax Dan Deatherage Kevin Myers September 3,2004
Background • Symbiotic water mites • Mussels provide hosts to mites • Size requires molecular techniques • Molecular phylogeny Vs. Classical Phylogeny • Cytocrome Oxidase I (COI) gene Vs. Internal Transcriber Sequence (ITS)
Why These Mites? • Readily found and collected • Generally many individuals in each population • Mites similar to these have been heavily studied • The COI sequences for these mites are not known • This field of study is open to new research without fear of being “scooped” • The dissemination of species was begun by Dr. Edwards
Unionicola sp. • All species of Unionicola are morphologically very similar Utterbackita imbecillisAnadonta suborbiculata
Proposed Research • Project begun through the UExplore Undergraduate Research Program summer 2004. • Mites chosen because their close classical phylogeny classification. • Results during the summer have shown that the methods we will use are effective.
Species of Mites to Study Include: • From the subgenus Parisitax: • Unionicola formosa from Pyganadon cataracta • U. formosa from P. grandis • From the subgenus Unionicoloides: • Unionicola kavanaughi • U. gailae • U. hoesei • U. lasallei • U. amandita
Ladder |–––––1-4––––––||–––––5-8––––––| |–-––––9-12–––-––| Gel electrophoresis of U. foili from U. imbecillis (1-8) and U. formosa from A. suborbiculata (7-12). There are bright bands for each mite, supporting the near correct sequence of our primers.
Timeline • Sept 15 Preliminary extraction underway. All materials gathered. • Sept 30 All DNA extracted from initial mites and 2 species sent for sequencing. • Oct 15 2 more species sequenced, initial 2 species sequence analysis began. • Oct 30 Final 2 sequences returned, analysis continuing. • Nov 15 All sequence analysis complete, manuscript begun. • Nov 30 All lab work done, and manuscript in final stages. • Dec 15 Manuscript submitted for class and for publication.
Budget ItemCost • DNA Sequencing $300 (16 sequences) • Qiagen DNeasy Tissue Kit $156 • Promega PCR Master Mix $67 (100 reactions) Total: $523
References • Boore, J. L. 1999. Animal Mitochondrial Genomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 27(8):1767-1780. • Edwards, D. D. and Ernsting, B. R. 2004. UExplore Undergraduate Research Proposal. • Myers, Kevin, Eyler, Andrea, and Rasure, Mark. 2004. Unpublished Data. • Navajas, M. and P. Boursot. 2003. Nuclear ribosomal DNA monoplyly versus mitochondrial DNA polyphyly in two closely related mite species: the influence of life history and molecular drive. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 270 Suppl 1:S124-127.