130 likes | 246 Views
The Reason-Giving Game. 80-100: Introduction to Philosophy May 21, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University. The Reason-Giving Game. Models philosophical inquiry as a reason-giving game The players: A: "the claimant" B: "the challenger". Moves in the game.
E N D
The Reason-Giving Game 80-100: Introduction to Philosophy May 21, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University
The Reason-Giving Game • Models philosophical inquiry as a reason-giving game • The players: • A: "the claimant" • B: "the challenger"
Moves in the game • Claims (two kinds) • Challenges (two kinds) • Defendings (two kinds) • Retractions • Withdrawals
Two kinds of claims • Presumptive • Non-presumptive • What's the difference? • Presumptive claims are claims that can be taken as given, because they are acceptable to both parties given their shared common ground • What effect does advancing a claim have on the game?
Two kinds of challenges • Bare • Assertional • What's the difference? • An assertional challenge presents grounds for doubt - reason(s) that count against the claim • What effect do challenges have on the game?
Two kinds of defendings • Direct • Indirect • What's the difference? • Direct defendings directly respond to the challenge by providing supporting reasons for the claim. Indirect defendings respond to a challenge by showing that the challenge is misplaced in some way. • What sorts of effects can a defending have on the game?
Two final possible moves • Withdrawals • Retractions • What's the distinction between a withdrawal and a retraction? • A retraction is a reversal of the commitment to defend (generally on the part of the claimant). A withdrawal is the reversal of a challenge (generally on the part of the challenger). • What is the effect of each of these moves on the game?
Exercise We should postpone the picnic. Move: Non-presumptive claim Effect: Starts the discussion Why? Move: bare challenge Effect: Provokes a defending, suspends use of the claim It's going to rain. Move: direct defending Effect: Presents another (embedded) claim How do you know? Move: bare challenge Effect: challenges the direct defense; suspends use of that defense Haven't you seen the weather forecast? Move: indirect defending Effect: Establishes previous claim as presumptive No. If you have, though, it's your call. Move: withdrawal Effect: Challenger gives up his/her challenge; allows the original claim to be used.
Now you try! * Small Group Exercise
The Meno * Small Group Exercise
Socratic Philosophy • Socrates or Plato? • Socrates: 469-399 B.C.E. • Plato: 429-347 B.C.E. • Socrates sentenced to death by Athenians for "crimes" against the state
The Apology • Account of Socrates' trial • Apologia • "A defense especially of one's opinions, position or actions"