220 likes | 365 Views
A regulatory perspective on FTTx deployments. Chinyelu Onwurah, Head of Telecoms Technology, Ofcom 19 th June 2007 FTTx Summit. The UK is witnessing significant private sector investment in faster broadband access. 2,210,000 local loops unbundled UK DSL allows 2Mbps to up to 97% of homes
E N D
A regulatory perspective on FTTx deployments Chinyelu Onwurah, Head of Telecoms Technology, Ofcom 19th June 2007 FTTx Summit
The UK is witnessing significant private sector investment in faster broadband access • 2,210,000 local loops unbundled • UK DSL allows 2Mbps to up to 97% of homes • UK LLU operators are launching services up to 24 Mbps • Cable rolling out 10 Mbps services • BT launched nationwide 8Mbps ADSL Max service - 6Mbps to ~60% of homes • Current DSL and cable deployments are meeting consumer bandwidth demands Awareness of Connection Speed Source: Ofcom research February 2007
UK DSL: over 99.9% Cable: 46% LLU: 67% Scotland DSL: 99.9% Cable: 37% LLU: 39% NE DSL: 100.0% Cable: 47% LLU: 71% Y&H DSL: 100.0% Cable: 42% LLU: 69% NW DSL: 100.0% Cable: 51% LLU: 90% EM DSL: 100.0% Cable: 52% LLU: 70% Wales DSL: 100.0% Cable: 23% LLU: 32% WM DSL: 100.0% Cable: 56% LLU: 75% SW DSL: 100.0% Cable: 34% LLU: 40% Broadband take up and availability Broadband take-up London DSL: 100.0% Cable: 61% LLU: 100% SE DSL: 100.0% Cable: 42% LLU: 67% Broadband availability Base: All adults 15+/all SMEs Source: Ofcom research 2006
UK broadband market today Broadband prices over time Broadband lines by headline download speed Source: Ofcom
Current Broadband Cable Modem 8Mbit/s or more DSL More than 4 but less than 8Mbit/s DSL More than 2 but less than 4Mbit/s Fibre More than 1 but less than 2Mbit/s ADSL2 Less than 1Mbit/s Exchange Fibre ADSL2+ Fibre Fibre Fibre VDSL Fibre Cable Docsis 3 So what happens next? Maximum obtainable DSL speeds
Next generation core and access network investment is gaining speed within Europe KPN proposes FTTC Telenor NGN core TDC FTTC / VDSL BT, C&W, Thus NGN core Deutsche Telekom FTTC / VDSL Belgacom FTTC / VDSL Telekom Austria NGN core France Telecom NGN core Swisscom FTTC / VDSL France Telecom, Illiad, FTTH trials Telecom Italia IP core upgrade Source: EC, operator announcements
The economics of access fibre deployment differ by market Drivers for access NGN deployment • End to end infrastructure competition • Limited opportunities for DSL evolution • Pay TV opportunities • Non-availability of unbundled DSL • Government led supply side strategies UK loop lengths are shorter than those in the US Source: Analysys, various
Regulatory principles • Promote competition at deepest level where it will be effective and sustainable • Deliver equality of access beyond those levels • Withdraw regulation at other levels • Promote a favourable climate for efficient investment • Varying regulatory solutions for different products and geographies • Create scope for market entry • Light touch regulation elsewhere in communications value chain
Questions for this session • Promote competition at deepest level where it will be effective and sustainable • Deliver equality of access beyond those levels • Withdraw regulation at other levels • Promote a favourable climate for efficient investment • Varying regulatory solutions for different products and geographies • Create scope for market entry • Light touch regulation elsewhere in communications value chain
Promote competition at deepest level where it will be effective and sustainable • Deliver equality of access beyond those levels • Withdraw regulation at other levels • Promote a favourable climate for efficient investment • Varying regulatory solutions for different products and geographies • Create scope for market entry • Light touch regulation elsewhere in communications value chain
Competition at the deepest level where it will be effective and sustainable • 1,600 unbundled exchanges • Price competition (‘free’ broadband offers) • Service innovation Local loop unbundling Results Altnet network DSLAM MDF BT Altnet
Where is that point in next generation access networks? Competition needs to… Examples • be technically feasible • be practically feasible • have the prospect of being effective and sustainable • maximise scope for innovation • duct sharing • sub-loop unbundling • fibre unbundling at the exchange • bitstream access • ….and others too
Duct sharing • civil works around 70% of deployment cost But… • BT’s duct network unmapped and incomplete • very significant practical challenges • scope for innovation in cabling
Sub-loop unbundling • moves competition in infrastructure closer to customer Sub-loop unbundling But… Point of interconnection Cabinet • is it practical to have competing infrastructure at this level? • is effective competition likely to be sustainable? mini MDF Altnet network DSLAM BT Altnet
Fibre unbundling at the exchange Fibre unbundling • very like today’s local loop unbundling But… • possible for point-to-point fibre • ..but difficult for shared infrastructures (e.g. PONs) • would not need to be at the exchange Altnet network OLU ODF BT Altnet
Bitstream access • lack of complexity in wholesale product definition • technically and practically straightforward But… • moves level of infrastructure competition away from customer • risk of reduced competitive innovation in local access
Promote competition at deepest level where it will be effective and sustainable • Deliver equality of access beyond those levels • Withdraw regulation at other levels • Promote a favourable climate for efficient investment • Varying regulatory solutions for different products and geographies • Create scope for market entry • Light touch regulation elsewhere in communications value chain
Negative Positive Regulation results in inefficient investment Impact of market distortions arising from regulatory policy Regulation deters efficient investment NPV of NGA investments Pre-regulation NPV Impact of regulation Post regulation NPV How may regulation promote a favourable climate for efficient and timely investment in next generation infrastructure? Regulatory policy can distort investment decisions in either direction • Main role of regulator is provision of regulatory certainty, possibly through • Ex ante regulatory forbearance • Sunset clauses on regulatory remedies • Risk adjusted returns • Whatever approach is adopted, it must not distort market conditions such that: • inefficient investments are incentivised • disproportionate regulation deters efficient investment
Potential solutions Various solutions, including… • access obligations but no regulatory determined prices • cost of capital specific to next generation access • returns adjusted for a ‘fair bet’ • ‘anchor’ product regulation
Next generation access raises regulatory challenges • Providing incentives for efficient and timely investment • Ensuring wide scale availability of high speed data services • Minimising uncertainty on: • future regulatory intervention • expected returns from NGA • Promoting competition • Protecting consumers • Public policy objectives • Legacy regulation and migration
Autumn consultation to: • Review • Where we are today • The opportunities NGA presents • The prospects for competition in NGA • Consult on • Public policy issues and challenges related to NGA - is there a need for NGA services? How should any need be met? • regulatory strategy: what, if anything, should be done to secure investment in NGA? Once NGA is deployed, how should Ofcom promote competition to achieve consumer and citizen benefit? • what options are there for new regulatory remedies and approaches e.g. duct sharing? • what are the specific regulatory challenges posed by NGA?