1 / 12

Professor Paul Bates

Professor Paul Bates. SWOT and hydrodynamic modelling. According to UNESCO in 2004 floods caused ….. ~7k deaths Also ~225k deaths due to Asian tsunami, effectively a coastal plain flood affected ~116M people 7.5Bn USD of damages Flooding is the major natural hazard worldwide

herbst
Download Presentation

Professor Paul Bates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Professor Paul Bates SWOT and hydrodynamic modelling

  2. According to UNESCO in 2004 floods caused ….. ~7k deaths Also ~225k deaths due to Asian tsunami, effectively a coastal plain flood affected ~116M people 7.5Bn USD of damages Flooding is the major natural hazard worldwide 107 out of 305 UNESCO-listed natural disasters in 2004 were floods Always the largest category each year Flooding as a global problem

  3. Flood dynamics • Large low amplitude waves • 1-1000km in length • <1 hour to 6 months duration • Low slope 1-100cm km-1 • Gradually varied flow • Above bankfull stage waves spread in 2D over floodplains • Complex shallow water inundation dynamics • Major control on wetland biogeochemistry and carbon cycling

  4. Hydrodynamic models • Principal tool for assessing flood risk • Provide dynamic predictions of water depth and velocity • Horizontal scales of ~1-1000 m • Temporal scales of ~1-60 s over events lasting up to 1 year • Domain sizes of ~1- 100,000 km2 • Can be 1, 2 or 3 dimensional (but consensus that floodplain inundation is at least a 2D process)

  5. Boundary conditions Discharge and stage at river gauging stations Topography Ideally LiDAR (<10m spatial resolution, <10cm rmse vertical accuracy), but can also use SRTM for large rivers Calibration/validation data Measurements of water height and flood extent Used to calibrate model friction parameters Model data needs

  6. Limited to…. Point gauging stations Very small numbers of consistent inundation images Satellite altimetery (=gauges) Current measurements of surface water dynamics

  7. Carlisle, UK – 10m model vs. ground survey RMSE on water depth = 0.32 m

  8. = correct = over-prediction = under-prediction = predicted as flooded, no ASAR coverage Upton on Severn, UK – 18m model vs Airborne SAR Model fit = 89%

  9. Data limitations to modelling • When we have distributed cal/val data we can do great modelling • But ….. • Existing gauges only test bulk flow routing • Allows modellers to ‘get away with’ 1D codes such as HEC-RAS which are known to miss important aspects of flood physics • We only have data to test 2D model performance at ~10-15 sites globally • Often only 1 flood extent image per event • Doesn’t allow us to test model dynamics • Lack of sufficient cal/val data means that many flood models suffer from high uncertainty

  10. What data do we want? • Must have …. • Over the mission lifetime generate data to calibrate 2D models at a ‘large’ number of sites • Need flood extent with pixel sizes of ~100m or less and water elevations to at least decimeter level accuracy • ‘Large’ here means data for O(1-2) more river reaches than we currently have • Will make 2D modelling routine globally • For a more limited number of sites we need multiple synoptic images of flood extent and grids of water elevation through events • Will allow model dynamic performance to be tested effectively for the first time and lead to the development of better modelling tools • Would be nice • Discharge measurements in ungauged rivers accurate to ±25% • Better global floodplain terrain data • SRTM is all we have, but this has ~5m scale vertical noise at 3 arc-second resolution • Ideally need a global floodplain DEM with decimeter scale vertical errors

  11. YES! Don’t need to image all floods, just a sufficient number Dealing with whole river reaches (10-1000km) so exact orbit repeat is not necessary to image a single flood multiple times Pixel size and water height/slope accuracy within specification Discharge will be routinely measured Better floodplain terrain data may be a fantastic side product of the mission Could be an important secondary science goal, but may incur some processing costs Will SWOT do this? Credit: Karen Wiedman

  12. Hydrodynamic modelling – key message • Routine application of hydrodynamic models appropriate to simulating floodplain inundation is currently prevented by a lack of observed 2D flood extent and water height data that can be used to calibrate such schemes. SWOT will provide this data and allow a step change in our ability to model floods.

More Related