340 likes | 523 Views
E N D
1. Medium Pressure “Cone & Thread” Fittings: Are labor intensive costing approximately $16.00 per connection in labor costs necessary to perform cutting, de-burring, coning threading and installation processes. Additionally, Cone and Thread style fittings require costly and specialized equipment and the technicians who work with these fittings must be highly skilled. Finally, Cone & Thread fittings are recognized to be prone to re-work in vibration areas and from shipping, requiring full inspection prior to equipment start-up.
Parker MPI™ Fittings From Parker Hannifin: Cut initial installation labor by 50%, requiring less than $4.00 in labor cost per connection. Since they are a compression style fitting, MPI™ fittings utilize no special tools, equipment, or require no specialized training. Finally, Parker MPI™ provides for exceptional vibration performance. They do not require any re-work or a need to have a lengthy inspection process prior to equipment start-up.Medium Pressure “Cone & Thread” Fittings: Are labor intensive costing approximately $16.00 per connection in labor costs necessary to perform cutting, de-burring, coning threading and installation processes. Additionally, Cone and Thread style fittings require costly and specialized equipment and the technicians who work with these fittings must be highly skilled. Finally, Cone & Thread fittings are recognized to be prone to re-work in vibration areas and from shipping, requiring full inspection prior to equipment start-up.
Parker MPI™ Fittings From Parker Hannifin: Cut initial installation labor by 50%, requiring less than $4.00 in labor cost per connection. Since they are a compression style fitting, MPI™ fittings utilize no special tools, equipment, or require no specialized training. Finally, Parker MPI™ provides for exceptional vibration performance. They do not require any re-work or a need to have a lengthy inspection process prior to equipment start-up.
2. Topics
Elastomeric Seals & NeSSI
Compounding
O-Ring Design
Chemical Compatibility
3. Elastomeric Seals & NeSSI
4. Elastomeric Seals & NeSSI
5. Elastomeric Seals & NeSSI
6. Metal and plastic retained elastomeric composite seals
Polymeric and plastic seals
Homogeneous and inserted elastomeric shapes
Elastomeric O-Rings
Rubber and plastic boots/bellows
Extruded and precision-cut and fabricated elastomeric seals
Thermoplastic engineered seals
EMI shielding and thermal management products Here are some general descriptions of the products we make.Here are some general descriptions of the products we make.
7. Elastomeric Seals & NeSSI
8. “… designs and manufactures engineered elastomeric o-ring seals.”
9. Extrusion & Nibbling Failure Modes
10. The seal swells, shrinks, loses physical properties, or gets brittle.
Excessive swell, brittleness, and dramatic loss in physical properties
Shrinkage: the fluid is extracting something from the rubber (changing the base polymer usually isn’t required.)
11. Butyl (IIR)
Neoprene (CR)
Ethylene-Propylene (EPR, EPDM)
Fluorosilicone (FVMQ)
Nitrile (NBR)
Polyacrylate (ACM)
Hydrogenated Nitrile (HNBR) Polyurethane (AU, EU)
Silicone (VMQ)
Fluorocarbon (FKM)
Tetrafluoroethylene-Propylene (TFE/P)
Perfluoroelastomer (FFKM)
17. Base polymer determines chemical resistance, rough temperature limits, and rebound resilience
In some materials, the high and low temp limits can be modified by other compounding ingredients.
Provides “baseline” for abrasion resistance, compression set resistance, permeability
These can (and almost always are) modified – up or down – by other compounding ingredients.
18. Polymer chains must be cross-linked to achieve resilience and elasticity.
Sulfur
Organic Peroxides
Bisphenol
Others: specialty materials have special cure chemistry
19. Reinforcing agents add mechanical strength and resistance to abrasion & permeation
Carbon black: standard for black compounds
Silica: standard for non-black compounds
Fillers lower the cost of a compound but reduce compression set resistance and elongation
20. Oils and / or polymers to lower the low temp limits and make the material flow better
Reduce resistance to compression set
In “generic” materials, they are used to offset the hardening influence of high levels of filler
Can extract into process fluids, resulting in seal shrinkage & hardening
26. What makes a reliable O-ring design?
Squeeze
Seal deforms significantly (~25%)
Rubber does not compress or lose volume
Stretch
Gland fill
Volume-to-void ratio
Surface finish
Balance of machining costs with application & testing needs
Installation
Protect seal from sharp edges
Provide lead-in chamfers
27. Compression expressed as a percentage of the free-state cross-sectional thickness of the O-ring.
(O-Ring C/S) - Gland Depth
(O-Ring C/S)
Face Seal: 20-30%
Static Male/Female: 18-25%
Reciprocating: 10-20%
Rotary: 0-10%
28. O-Ring volume as a percentage of Gland volume.
(O-Ring Volume)
(Gland Volume)
About 25% void space or 75% nominal fill
Need space in groove to allow for volume swell, thermal expansion, and increasing width due to squeeze
34. Acknowledgements
35. Welcome to ISA 2003 and the unveiling of Parker IntraFlow™.
This revolutionary solution to analyzer problems will reduce your process analyzer sample system cost of ownership by up to 50%.
Welcome to ISA 2003 and the unveiling of Parker IntraFlow™.
This revolutionary solution to analyzer problems will reduce your process analyzer sample system cost of ownership by up to 50%.