340 likes | 374 Views
Seismic Isolation for AdV Stefano Braccini – INFN Pisa. 2 Hz. Long Pendula. Ground. Resonances. f -2N. Transmisson. Frequency (Hz). Soft Springs. Mirror. Superattenuator. Magnetic Antisprings. 8 m. Blade Springs. Transfer Function Indirect Measurement. Thermal Noise.
E N D
2 Hz Long Pendula Ground Resonances f-2N Transmisson Frequency (Hz) Soft Springs Mirror
Superattenuator Magnetic Antisprings 8 m Blade Springs
Transfer Function Indirect Measurement Thermal Noise Ground Seismic Noise Mirror Residual Seismic Noise
GEO600 TAMA 300 VIRGO LIGO
Displacement (m .Hz-1/2) Transfer Function < 10-10 SA design e freccette Top frequency (Hz) Mirror Direct Transfer Function Measurement
Residual Seismic Noise Upper Limits Thermal Noise Ground Seismic Noise Mirror Residual Seismic Noise
AdV Sensitivity h(f) frequency (Hz)
V V V V 0.2 0.2 Magnet Coil -0.2 -0.2 Lunghezza cavità l/100 Locking
Low Frequency Mirror Swing Ground Mirror
M g Inverted Pendulum Flex Joint 30 mHz
Accelerometers RESIDUAL SWING < 0.1 mm DSP DAC Actuators ADC
Digital Analog
0-200 mHz top-stage motion affected by wind MIRROR CORRECTION WIND SEA
Any Calm Actuator Range Optimization
Adv VIRGO Control noise in windy days (5% of running time)
…… and for third generation? Superattenuator Performance enough for AdV
High Sens Range Stressed Measurement T = 41943 s High Sens Range
TF < 3 x 10-13 TOP 7.6 x 10-6m Hz-1/2 1.5 x 10-9m Hz-1/2 MIRROR Stressed Measurement T = 41943 s High Sens Range 2 x 10-18m Hz-1/2
Underground input seismic noise will be much smaller WIDE SAFETY MARGIN 1.6 x 10-25Hz-1/2
Shift seismic wall from 3-4 Hz to 1-2 Hz
2 Hz Long Pendula Ground Resonances f-2N Transmisson Frequency (Hz) Soft Springs Mirror
N 1 Hz 2 Hz ------------------------- {3, 1.6*10-7, 5.4*10-10} {4, 4.8*10-8, 3.3*10-11} {5, 2.6*10-8, 3.4*10-12} {6, 2.3*10-8, 6.7*10-12} {7, 2.1*10-8, 2.6*10-12} Optimized at 1Hz Courtesy G. Cella ~50 m Horizontal
Tiltmeters R&D 10-8-10-9 rad Hz-1/2 @ 30 mHz
Control Noise (Now) Low Noise DAC development (R&D in progress) 5-10 How much ultra-low freq. dynamics is reduced underground ? Extension of Hierarchical Control………………
CONCLUSIONS Superattenuators are adequate for Advanced Detectors (Passive Isolation & Low Noise Control) A 6D inertial top stage control could help in windy days (SAFE program) ET Superattenuator design dominated by the “seismic wall” frequency requirement (Newtonian noise estimates)