240 likes | 259 Views
This study explores implications of using ICT in Icelandic education, focusing on teachers, learners, and schools. Drawing on a curriculum analysis, it examines the revision process, school perspectives, and policy impacts. The research includes interviews, surveys, document analysis, and observations to understand disruptions in pedagogical spaces. Activity theory and curriculum perspectives are used to analyze the relationships between ICT, teaching practices, and learning outcomes.
E N D
“Please don´t talk while I am interrupting!”Voices heard in the construction of the ICT curriculum in Iceland Allyson Macdonald LearnICT project Iceland University of Education SERA Annual Conference, 25th-27th November 2004
The study • In all 18 schools, grades 1-10 • What are the implications of using ICT for • Teachers and teaching? • Learners and learning? • The school as an organisation? • Survey of pupil views • Survey of teachers self-evaluated skills • This particular study draws on four of these schools and a study of the development of the national curriculum.
The approach • Curriculum issues • Activity theory • (ICT and leadership) • Analysis • Conclusions
The revision of the national curriculum 1996-99 • Previous curriculum 1989 • Revised 1996-1999 • Project manager • Managament committee • Subject coordinators • Preparatory groups • Workgroups • Two policy committees – curriculum and IT
The structure of the national curriculum 1999 • Compulsory and secondary school produced at the same time • Two new subjects – IT/ICT and life-skills • Compulsory schooling 1st – 10th grade • Final goals 10th grade • Aims 4th, 7th and 10th grades • Objectives for every grade in most subjects
Datasources • Documents – policy reports, preparatory reports, national curriculum, school curriculum • Four semi-structured interviews with policy makers, one of them an e-interview • Schools (four, urban, established) • On-site interviews with principals, ICT coordinators • Two focus groups of teachers with six teachers each • One focus group with six students • Analysis of school curriculum • On-site visits (11 lessons) • Part of the larger LearnICT study – student survey, teachers’ self-evaluation of skills, observations, interviews, document analysis
Disruptions in pedagogical spaces - 2003 Voices of policy – official initiatives and programmes Voices of teachers – professional and curriculum interests The construction of the ICT curriculum Voices of ICT – interests of software developers Voices of pupils – out of school use of ICT Robertson et al., 2003
Force fields • Some of it relates to the competing discourses or “force fields” which operate in the context for classroom practices. • Rather our work suggests that ICT seems to rupture more fundamental arrangements and as a result changes the relationships and relations these dimensions carry. Robertson et al. 2003
Activity theory – contradictions Mediating tools CONTEXT OUTCOME Subjector actor Object or task Rules Community Roles
Curriculum perspectives • Dominant perspective • Institutionalised text • Aims and objectives • Learning experiences • Reconceptualist perspective • Other approaches: historical, biographical, postmodern • Educational principles • Individualism or traditionalism
Disruptions in pedagogical spaces – 2004 Voices of policy – official initiatives and programmes Voices of teachers – professional and curriculum interests Voices of soft- ware developers Voices of principals? School Class Voices of pupils – out of school use of ICT Voices of pupils – in school use of ICT Robertson et al., 2003
Observations/ Interviews Documents/ Web-sites Interviews/ Observations
Voices • Policy-makers • Software • Pupils • Outside schools • Inside schools • Teachers • Principals
Mediating tools – ICT and pupils • Out-of-school ICT activities - pupils • Collaborative (e.g. games, web-sites) • Communicative (e.g. MSN, blogg) • Creative web-sites(e.g. programming, web-sites) • In-school use – pupils’ curriculum • Microsoft software • Technical, transmissive • Tedious! • The curriculum as tool • The pupils as a tool
Rules – school curriculum • The published curriculum • The school curriculum • Timetables • National standards • School options • Teaching contracts • Facilities • Access • Supervision
Division of labour – pupils, teachers, principals • Novices – experts • Principal • Delegation • Subject leaders • Class teacher/subject specialisation
Community – school culture • Community • collaboration – pressure • just-in-time vs. CPD • Commitment – to learning • Computers – that work!! • Vision of the principal • Managerial • Supportive • Authority
The principal’s voice • Leadership, management and administration • New rules • New laws • Technology • Roles • Educational leader • Manager • Community • Staff • Culture
The object /outcome • Policy-makers • Wanted a curriculum for analytical thinking and for promoting a way of working • Wanted a cross-curriculum approach • Produced a curriculum which has been interpreted as prescriptive, with lists of things to know and do; • Creativity and applied knowledge and CDT are rarely found in school curricula or in practice • Principals – want ICT for learning • Teachers – not sure • Pupils – capable but conservative
The object /outcome – the curriculum • Twining – Computer Practice Framework • IT skills • IT for learning • support • extend • transform • The constructed curriculum • Support, extension, not oftern transformation • For IT skills, not for ICT as a tool in learning • Computer skills and information skills A cacophony of voices! Thank you!