1 / 13

Related literature can be downloaded from: eci.tbm.tudelft.nl

herrod-garza
Download Presentation

Related literature can be downloaded from: eci.tbm.tudelft.nl

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The non-trivial choice among innovation indicatorsby Alfred Kleinknecht, Professor, Economics of Innovation, TU Delft & Visiting Professor, Université Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris IKey note speech to the Ester/ESF Workshop: "The Economic History of Patents and Innovation", Eindhoven University of Technology, 23-26 June 2009 Related literature can be downloaded from: www.eci.tbm.tudelft.nl

  2. Indicators of innovation: • R&D (Research & Development): Man hours of R&D as a percentage of total personnel; or R&D budget as a percentage of total sales; or, a country's R&D spending as a percentage of its National Product • Total innovations costs (Including non-R&D innovation costs) • Patents granted or patent applications (at the European, US or national patent offices) • Sales of new products: The share in total sales taken by technologically new or substantially improved products, introduced during the past 3 years. Distinction between "New to the firm" (→Imitation) and "New to the market" (→Innovation) • New product announcements in trade journals

  3. Note: • These five indicators have a very weak correlation with each other: it does make a difference which one you use!

  4. R&D (personnel or budgets): Strengths: + Regularly collected since the 1950s + Can be subdivided by product and process effort + Easily accessible (in aggregated form); + Time series available + Analysis of inter-sectoral technology flows is possible

  5. R&D (personnel or budgets): Weaknesses: - It is an input indicator - Usually it cannot be split by technical fields - It is only one of several input indicators (besides design, trial production, tooling-up, market analysis, training, investment in fixed assets etc.) - Undercounting of small firm R&D (calls into question usefulness for comparison across firm size classes, sectors, regions and even countries): serious measurement problems due to subsidy schemes. - Problems with the interpretation of the Frascati definition - Use of micro data by researchers is often hampered by secrecy - “Singapore effect” - Hard to disaggregate by regions (multi-plant firms)

  6. Total innovation expenditures: Strength: + Measures many more aspects than just R&D, e.g. design, trial production, tooling-up, market analysis, training, investment in fixed assets. Weaknesses: - Input measure - Difficult to report in surveys (high item non-response) - Inclusion in a questionnaire may have negative impact on overall response

  7. Patents granted or patent applications: Strengths: + Long historical time series available + Publicly available (no secrecy problems) + Relatively consistent over time + Classification by technical field is possible + Citation analysis is possible

  8. Patents granted or patent applications: Weaknesses: - Misses non-patented innovations; note that the probability to patent an innovation differs (substantially!): - Across firm size class; - Between firms that do or do not collaborate on R&D; - Between sectors - Patent figures may be obscured by strategic behaviour - Hard to classify by economic sectors

  9. Sales of innovative products: Strengths: + Direct measure of innovation + Only successful innovations (positive cash flow) + Interesting distinction between imitation and innovation + By relating R&D input to innovative output, we can say something about factors that influence efficiency of the innovation process

  10. Sales of innovative products: Weaknesses: - Sometimes suffering from low response rates - Will the firms adequately interpret our definitions? - Accuracy of answers? - Probably quite sensitive to the business cycle - Inter-sectoral comparisons can be problematic (length of life cycles differs)

  11. New product announcements in trade journals: Strengths: + Direct measure of innovation + Not expensive to collect + No secrecy problems + Can be classified by type of innovation + Data can be extended to the past + Covers innovations in very small firms + Tracing of inter-sectoral flows is easily done + Easy to disaggregate by regions + Allows analysis of success and failure of innovation

  12. New product announcements in trade journals: Weaknesses: - Less suitable for comparative studies as statistical properties of database appear dubious - Reliability depends on adequate selection of journals - Process innovations are neglected - Innovations from small market niches may be missed - Influenced by publication policy of journals and firms - Larger firms appear to be clearly under-represented

  13. Final remarks: • Note that the various innovation indicators have a weak correlation with each other. It therefore matters which one you use; the choice between indicators depends on your research purpose. Further reading: • Kleinknecht, A., K. van Montfort & E. Brouwer: "The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators", in Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 11 (2002), p. 109-121. • OECD Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edition (2007); download: http://www.oecd.org/document/

More Related