430 likes | 612 Views
Wireless Vulnerabilities in the Wild: View From the Trenches. Deepak Gupta AirTight Networks. Acknowledgement: Based on work presented by K N Gopinath at RSA 2011. Agenda. Why care about Wireless Vulnerabilities? (Motivation). What’s new in this talk and what are its implications?.
E N D
Wireless Vulnerabilities in the Wild: View From the Trenches Deepak Gupta AirTight Networks Acknowledgement: Based on work presented by K N Gopinath at RSA 2011
Agenda Why care about Wireless Vulnerabilities? (Motivation) What’s new in this talk and what are its implications? Wireless Vulnerability Analysis (Measurements) Threat/Vulnerability Mitigation
Marshalls store hacked via wireless • Hackers accessed TJX network & multiple servers for 18+ months • 45.7 million payment credit accounts compromised • Estimated liabilities > 4.5B USD Real Life Breaches due to Insecure Use of Wi-Fi
Are today’s enterprises secure enough to prevent the recurrence of such attacks? 5
Enter War Driving How many of these are actually connected to my network? Not all APs are WPA/WPA2. WPA/WPA2 AP (%) NY London Paris 6
War Driving Insufficient for Enterprise Threat Classification Authorized Our Study External Rogue
Sensor Based Statistical Sampling Data collected over last two years 8
268,383 APs 80,515 187,868 Enterprises Deal With Lot of Non-Enterprise Devices 70% APs do NOT belong to the studied Organizations! External/ Unmanaged Authorized Similarly, About 87% Clients are Unmanaged/External!
Wireless Threat SpaceAP Based Threats • Rogue APs • AP mis-configurations • Soft/Client Based APs AP
Wireless Threat SpaceClient based threats • Client extrusions Connections to neighbors, evil twins • Adhoc networks Adhoc Network • Client bridging • Banned devices
T3 (T-Cube) Parameters Presence of an instance of a threat (%) Threat Duration Window of opportunity for an attacker Threat Presence Threat Frequency Likelihood of presence of a threat instance
Real-life data & Accurate picture of Threats How does this information help you? Get an idea of Wi-Fi threat scenario in enterprises that may be like yours Which wireless threats you should worry about first? Plan your enterprise mitigation strategy
Simple (Yes/No) metric based on the presence of an instance of a threat (%) Threat Presence Threat Duration Threat Frequency 14
Results From Our Survey Randomly Chosen set of IT Security Professionals % Response Rogue AP Misconf. AP Adhoc Client Extrusion Other
Results Based on Our Data • Key Observations • Prominent Threats • Client extrusions • Rogue APs • AP mis-configurations • Adhoc clients • Key Implications • Organization data is • potentially at risk via Wi-Fi
Let’s Dive Deeper into Nature of Threats Rogue APs Client Extrusions Adhoc Clients
Enterprise Wireless Consumerization: Rogue APs1521 Rogue APs seen in our study 163 Different type of Consumer Grade OUIs seen
Rogue AP Details About 1 in 10 Rogue APs have Default SSIDs About Half of Rogue APs Wide Open
Rogue AP Details An open Rogue AP is Virtually THIS!
Client Consumerization: Client Extrusion Client (Smartphones & laptops both) probes for these SSIDs.
118,981Clients 12,002 106,979 21,777 (20.4%) 636 (5.3%) Authorized Unmanaged Client Probing For Vulnerable SSIDs Retail/SMB Organizations Power of Accurate threat classification. 5.3% Vs 20.4%
“Known” Vulnerable SSIDs Probed For103 distinct SSIDs recorded Certain (8%) Authorized Clients Probing for 5 or more SSIDs
Adhoc Authorized Clients!565 distinct Adhoc SSIDs found, About half of them Vulnerable 15% of these are default SSIDs. 26,443 (7%) clients in adhoc mode.
So What?Illustrative Exploit via Client Extrusion Smartphone as an Attacker App1: Mobile Hotspot App2: SSLStrip Attack Tool VIDEO DEMO: Smartpot MITM Attack
How long (time interval) a threat is active before removal? Threat Presence Threat Duration Threat Frequency 29
AP Threats live “longer” than Client Threats15% client threats & 30 % AP threats live for > hr Some AP based threats are active for a day or more! Histogram indicating that AP threats live longer Threat Duration Rogue AP AP Misconf. Client Extrusion Adhoc networks % Threat Instances with Given Threat Duration Data from SMB/Retail (PCI) Segment
Threat instances per Sensor per month Threat Presence Threat Duration Threat Frequency 31
Threat Frequency Large Enterprise Segment: Threats Per Month Per Sensor (Approx. 10,000 sq feet area) Bigger your organization, higher the likelihood of finding the threats Threat Frequency Threat Category
Key Takeaways Summarized • Wireless threats due to unmanaged devices are present • Enterprise wireless environment influenced by consumerization • Certain threats more common than others • Client extrusions • Rogue AP • AP Mis-configurations • Adhoc clients • Common threats affect large enterprise and SMB organizations • Wireless threats persist regardless of sophistication of wired network security
Use WPA2 For Your Authorized WLAN! But, WPA2 does not protect against threats due to unmanaged devices
Threat Mitigation Intrusions (AP Based Threats) • Wire side controls as a first line of defense (e.g., 802.1X port control) • Wireless IPS to automatically detect & block intrusions • Regular wireless scans to understand your security posture • - Cloud based solutions are available to automate wireless scans • Defense-In-Depth Mitigation Extrusions (Client Based Threats) • Educate users: clean up profiles, Use VPNs & connect to secure Wi-Fi • Deploy end point agents to automatically block connections to insecure Wi-Fi • Wireless IPS to automatically detect & block extrusions in enterprise perimeter
Apply Slide: Recommended Best Practices • Self Assessment Test • Scan your network to find out how vulnerable you are • Good chance that you will find a Rogue AP, higher chance that you will find client extrusion • Follow best practices • Educate your users to connect to secure Wi-Fi • Use VPN for remote connections • Clean up the Connection profiles of Wi-Fi clients periodically • Deploy end point agents to automate some of the above • Adopt a “defense in depth” security approach • Employ wire side defenses against Rogue APs (first line of defense) • Regularly scan your wireless perimeter • If risk assessment is high and/or you store super sensitive data • Threat containment via wireless IPS should be considered
Apply Slide: Recommended Best Practices Go Wi-Fi, But, The Safe Way!
Questions? Thank You deepak.gupta@airtightnetworks.com 40
A1: Location/Site Wise Distribution Key Observations Prominent threats are distributed across multiple sites. Key Implications You need an ability to monitor the entire organization, not just 1 or 2 sites
A2: Enterprise Vs PCI (SMB/Retail) Key Observations Similar pattern with respect to prominent threats Some difference w.r.t other threats Increased adhoc connections in PCI