1 / 7

Furthering Collaboration Among OAI Data Providers and Service Providers

Furthering Collaboration Among OAI Data Providers and Service Providers. Kat Hagedorn University of Michigan Libraries Digital Library Production Service April 19, 2004. OAI so far…. Quick overview of OAI… Very popular protocol, over 500 active data providers

hestia
Download Presentation

Furthering Collaboration Among OAI Data Providers and Service Providers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Furthering Collaboration Among OAI Data Providers and Service Providers Kat Hagedorn University of Michigan Libraries Digital Library Production Service April 19, 2004

  2. OAI so far… • Quick overview of OAI… • Very popular protocol, over 500 active data providers • Protocol use is simple, but providing a service using these data providers is more difficult… • …in part due to a lack of networking among data providers (DPs) and service providers (SPs)

  3. Lack of networking… • How do DPs know what SPs want? • How do SPs find DPs? • What’s the best method for SPs and DPs to talk about these issues?

  4. What to do about it? • Mogens Sandfær (DTV), Tom Habing (UIUC), Jeff Young (OCLC) and myself took this problem to the CERN OAI3 Workshop in Geneva in February • Led a breakout session of around 25 people to discuss the issues…

  5. The issues… • Lack of standards • Controlled vocabulary usage • Other classification systems / set structures • Metadata format usage • Lack of knowledge • Descriptive info: type of content, # of records, harvesting problems • Character encoding • Quality control

  6. Result of breakout session… • Interest in developing criteria • Interest in creating a registry addressing these issues (consolidation of existing registries?) • Interest in sharing stylesheet and schema cross-walks for metadata formats

  7. What happens next? • Need to move forward to: • Discuss further issues (e.g., what level quality notification?) • Build registry based on criteria • Determine who and how we will develop the criteria and registry • Result: one central place for the community to collaborate and grow

More Related