Grammatica

2. Grammatica

3. GRAMMATICa Lexica

4. GRAMMATICa Lexica

6. LEXAR and GRAMICONMutant Children of the Revolution Sally Rice Décade I, Nonidi de Germinal de l'Année CCXIV de la Revolution 29 March 2006

7. LEXAR and GRAMICONMutant Children of the Revolution Sally Rice Décade I, Nonidi de Germinal de l'Année CCXIV de la Revolution 29 March 2006

8. the age of enlightenment

9. the age of enlightenment

14. “We distinguish the lexicon from the computational system of the language, the syntax in a broad sense (including phonology). Assume that the syntax provides three fundamental levels of representation, each constituting an ‘interface’ of the grammatical system with some other system of the mind/brain: D-Structure, Phonetic Form (PF), and Logical Form (LF).”Chomsky 1995:130

15. “Any theory of language must include some sort of lexicon, the repository of all (idiosyncratic) properties of particular lexical items...The lexicon is a set of lexical elements, each an articulated system of features. It must specify, for each such element, the phonetic, semantic, and syntactic properties that are idiosyncratic to it, but nothing more.”Chomsky 1995:30. 130

16. [CP Spec [C’ C [IP Spec [I’ I VP]]]] “Items of the lexicon are of two general types: with or without substantive content. We restrict the term lexical to the former category; the latter are functional. Each item is a feature set. Lexical elements head NP, VP, AP, and PP.”Chomsky 1995:54

17. 4.2.2 The Lexicon I will have little to say about the lexicon here. Chomsky 1995:235 “The lexical entry provides...the information required for further computations.”Chomsky 1995:130

21. 1789

22. 1989

23. LAUD Conference on Cognitive Linguistics, Universität Duisburg 1989

24. LAUD Conference on Cognitive Linguistics, Universität Duisburg Les sans-culottes

25. Ron Langacker “A grammar is a structured inventory of conventional linguistic units.”

26.   Len Talmy

27. George Lakoff (a.k.a. Robespierre)

33. Towards more Republican Values

34. REFORM or REVOLUTION? “Whenever a change leaves the internal mechanism untouched, we have reform; whenever the internal mechanism is changed, we have revolution.” Daniel DeLeon, 1896, in address to the Workingmen of Boston

35. The Reformers

36. Ken Hale on LEXAR/GRAMICON items in Navajo

37. ch’ɪ́-shi-di-nɪ́-ɫ-da̜̜zh out-1SG.O-QUAL-3SG.MOM-TRANS-uncontrolled.movement ‘he jerked me out(side)’

38. Ray Jackendoff on the Lexicon-Grammar Interface Semantic Structures (1990) “To develop [a] more general theory of language (concerned with syntax and semantics and their points of connection), one must confront two basic problems, which might be called the Problem of Meaning and the Problem of Correspondence.” “The Problem of Meaning is to characterize the phenomena that a theory of meaning is to account for, and to develop a formal treatment of semantic intuitions.” “The Problem of Correspondence is to characterize the relationship between the formal treatment of meaning and the formal structure of syntax.”

39. eat V [CAUSE ([Thing ]A’ [GO ([Thing ] <A’> [TO [IN [MOUTH-OF []]]])])]) devour V [CAUSE ([Thing ]A’ [GO ([Thing ] A’ [TO [IN [MOUTH-OF []]]])])])

43. The Revolutionaries

44. Cognitive & Construction Grammarians looking at constructions as the basic building blocks of language

45. Corpus Linguists looking at N-grams, collocates, and collostructions

46. Language Teachers who teach collocations

47. Developmentalists and Computational Linguists looking at emergent structures in language such as lexical islands and lexical bundles