250 likes | 269 Views
Accountable Virtual Machines. Andreas Haeberlen, Paarijaat Aditya, Rodrigo Rodrigues, Peter Druschel OSDI 2010 Presenter: Lili Sun 2020/1/3. Outline. What is accountable virtual machine (AVM) and why do we need it? What AVM can do and how? How to evaluate its performance?
E N D
Accountable Virtual Machines Andreas Haeberlen, Paarijaat Aditya, Rodrigo Rodrigues, Peter Druschel OSDI 2010 Presenter: Lili Sun 2020/1/3
Outline • What is accountable virtual machine (AVM) and why do we need it? • What AVM can do and how? • How to evaluate its performance? • What’s the advantages and disadvantages of AVM?
The concept of AVM and Goals • Motivation X X Services Providers X Users
The Concept of AVM and Goals • Concept • AVM provides strong accountability. It provides users with the capacity to audit the execution of a software system by obtaining a log of the execution, and comparing it to a known-good execution. • Goals • Detection • Evidence
AVM Software S a tamper-evident log nondeterministic events AVMM a1 a2 m1 m2 Accountable Virtual Machine • AVM approach • Bob installs an AVMM and runs the software S • AVMM maintains a tamper-evident log and records nondeterministic events • Alice receives a message from M ——authenticator • Alice periodically audits M • If a fault is detected, give the evidence (MR, S, log, am) replay verify a1 a2
Accountable Virtual Machine • Users do not have to check the entire log • AVMM can enable users do spot check • spot check can save time. • an incorrect state transition in an unchecked segment will not be detected. • AVMM offers two guarantees • Completeness: if the machine is faulty, the audit of M will report a fault and produce the evidence • Accuracy: if a machine is not faulty, no audit of M will report a fault
Accountable Virtual Machine • AVM can be extended to multiple parties. • such as symmetric multi-party scenario or asymmetric multi-party scenario. • collect authenticators from other users • prevent using the network problem • distribute the evidence to other users
removes signatures AVM Software S logs the signatures and messages AVMM a1 s1 m1 m1 AVMM Design • The tamper-evident log • It is structured as a hash chain, ei := (si, ti, ci, hi) • When a user sends a message to M, the user signs the message with her own private key. • When M sends a message to the user, the AVMM attaches an authenticator which includes a signature with M’s private key. Acknowledgment Acknowledgment
AVM Software S AVMM a1 s1 m1 m1 AVMM Design • Accountable Virtual Machine Monitor (AVMM) • Recording nondeterministic inputs • Detecting inconsistencies • Checking snapshot Nondeterministic inputs logs the signatures and messages Acknowledgment Acknowledgment
AVM Software S AVMM aj ai mj mi AVMM Design • Auditing and replay • Verify the log's integrity • Verify a snapshot • Verify the execution • syntactic check • semantic check verify Download a snapshot Recompute the hash tree verify Download log: Lij Log segment (ei,…ej) ai aj
AVMM Design • Syntactic Check • Determines whether the log itself is well-formed • Including the cryptographic signature in the message and the acknowledgement, the sequence of the messages • Fast (6.9 seconds) • Semantic check • Determines whether the information in the log corresponds to a correct execution of MR • Instantiates a VM, and initializes with the snapshot • Reads Lij, and replays the inputs, and check the outputs • Verify the snapshot hashes in Lij against that of the replayed execution • Take as long as the application (1,977 seconds)
Application: Cheat Detection in Games • The three cheats that are used in Counterstrike are as follows: • aimbot, a cheat that works by feeding the game with forged inputs; • wallhack, a cheat that violate secrecy; • unlimited ammunition, cheats that rely on modifying local in-memory state. • AVMs are effective against two specific classes of cheats • cheats that need to be installed along with the game; • cheats that make the network-visible behavior of the cheater’s machine inconsistent with any correct execution.
Evaluation • Prototype Implementation • VMM: VMware workstation • Extended the VMM to record extra information • Adapted code from PeerReview, a system that provide accountability • Audit tool implements syntactic check and semantic check • If one of them fails, the log and the authenticators will be given to a third party as the evidences.
Evaluation • Experiment Setup • Three workstations, each for one player • Each CPU has four cores and two hyperthreads per core • The machines are connected to switch via 1Gbps Ethernet links • Five different configurations • Barehw, the game runs directly on the hardware, without virtualization • vmware-norec, adds the virtual machine monitor without modifications • vmware-rec, adds the logging for deterministic replay • avmm-nosig, uses AVMM implementation without signatures • avmm-rsa768, is the full system as described.
Evaluation • Log sizes and contents • Figure 3 shows the growth of the AVMM log • Figure 4 shows the average log growth rate about the content • 8MB/minute or 2.47MB/minute after compression 30% 27% 14% 70% 59%
Evaluation • Network traffic • AVMM increases network traffic for two reasons • first, it adds a cryptographic signature to each packet • second, it encapsulates all packets in a TCP connection • Compare bare-hw and avmm-rsa768 configuration • bare-hw: 22 kbps • avmm-rsa768: 215.5 kbps • The per-package overhead is much higher
5 ms 2 ms 525 μs 621 μs 192 μs Evaluation • Latency • AVMM adds some latency to packet transmissions because of the logging and processing of authenticators • In AVMM (RSA-768), both the ping and pong are acknowledged • Critical threshold of latency for interactive applications is 100ms
Evaluation • CPU utilization • AVMM requires additional CPU power for virtualization and for the tamper-evident log. • The utilization of HT0 is below 8%, while the average utilization over 8HTs is 12.5% • The overhead from the tamper-evident log is relatively low
Evaluation • Frame rate • The frame rate on the AVMM is 13% lower than the baseline. • Generally frame rate is about 60-80 fps, and AVMM is 137fps. • Recording in VMware workstation causes the average frame rate to drop 11%.
Evaluation • Online auditing • Online auditing can affect game performance • The frame rate drops from 137fps with no audits to 104fps with 2 audits • The audits can leverage the unused cores
Evaluation • Spot checking • the amount of data that must be transferred over the network, and the time it takes to replay the log segments chunk. • The cost grows with the k, and there is an additional fixed cost per chunk for transferring the corresponding memory and disk snapshots.
Advantages and Disadvantages of AVMs • Advantages • AVMs are application independent. • AVMs do not have to be trusted by the auditors. • AVMs can produce evidence. • AVMs are generic and effective against an entire class of cheats. • AVMs protect the player’s privacy for anti-cheating. • Disadvantages • AVMs cannot detect the bug or weakness in the software S. • AVMs cannot detect the correctness of inputs. • AVMs face additional challenges in the cloud: • auditors cannot easily replay the entire execution for lack of resources; • accountable services must be able to interact with non-accountable clients • it may not be practical to sign every single packet.
Discussion clues • For some long-running applications, it is impossible to check the entire log, but the spot check will lose the completeness, so is there a trade-off between completeness, accuracy and effectiveness? • The application in this paper is non-cloud based game and not a practical scenario, so it that sufficient to evaluate AVMs? • AVMs rely on the server to record all incoming and outgoing messages and assume that all the users agree on a virtual machine in which the application is executed. However, it is not practical in existing cloud platforms, which do not provide this functionality to their clients. • Because different operating systems are available for virtual machines, so how to manage the logging of AVMs in the cloud which use a large number of different operating systems?