1 / 43

Probiotics to Prevent Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea

Probiotics to Prevent Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea. By Jens Langsjoen. Outline. Background of probiotics and AAD Efficacy of probiotics to prevent AAD Safety of probiotics UNMH inpatient probiotics Recommendations. Background on Probiotics.

hide
Download Presentation

Probiotics to Prevent Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Probiotics to Prevent Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea By Jens Langsjoen

  2. Outline • Background of probiotics and AAD • Efficacy of probiotics to prevent AAD • Safety of probiotics • UNMH inpatient probiotics • Recommendations

  3. Background on Probiotics • “Live microorganisms, which when adminstered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” -FAO/WHO • Can be Bacteria or Fungi • Common OTC supplement • Have been studied in AAD, IBD, IBS, C diff, Cancer, allergies

  4. Origins • “Bacterium Lactis” 1st Bacteria ever discovered… in souring milk • Joseph Lister 1857

  5. Causes of AAD • Killing Anaerobic bacteria • They normally digest carbohydrates • This causes an Osmotic diarrhea • Altering gut flora overgrowth of pathogens • Like C diff!!! • More alteration of gut flora = more diarrhea • Pro-motility • erythromycin 1. Doron SI, Hibberd PL, Gorbach SL. Probiotics for prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, J ClinGastroenterol 2008;42 Suppl 2:S58-63.

  6. Frequency of AAD • Frequency range: 5-34%, • Can occur between initiation of abx and 2 months •  Hospitalized patients •  Sicker patients, old and young. •  Broad spectrum antibiotics. •  B-Lactams, cephalosporins, clindamycin. •  Longer Antibiotic Duration •  History of AAD

  7. AAD FrequencyClinical Trials 2. Wistrom J, Norrby SR, Myhre EB, Eriksson S, Granstrom G, Lagergren L, Englund G, Nord CE, Svenungsson B. Frequency of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in 2462 antibiotic-treated hospitalized patients: a prospective study, J AntimicrobChemother2001;47:43-50.

  8. AAD FrequencyPopulation Studies

  9. Clostridium Difficile • 10-25% of AAD are C diff infections6 • Extended LOS: between 3-7days • Increased subsequent infections: 20-65% 6. Al-Eidan FA, McElnay JC, Scott MG, Kearney MP. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in hospitalised patients, J Clin Pharm Ther 2000;25:101-109.

  10. Probiotic MOA • We only have theories… • Suppression of pathogenic bacterial growth • Improving intestinal barrier function • inducing protective cytokines • Immune system modulation • Suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines

  11. Metanalysesof Probiotics for AAD • All Probiotics • Avadhani 8 RCTs • Johnston 9 RCTs • Cremonini 9 RCTs • D’Souza 22 RCTs • McFarland 25 RCTs • Videlock 34 RCTs • ALL SHOW PROBIOTICS TO BE EFFECTIVE • S. Boulardii • McFarland 10 RCTs • Szajewska 6 RCTs • Lactobacillus • Kale-Pradham 10 RCTs • Sazawal 19 RCTs

  12. Meta-analysis: McFarland • 2006 American Journal of Gastroenterology • 31 RCTs on AAD prevention and C diff tx. • 25 RCTs on AAD: 2810 patients, all settings, all ages • 6 RCTs on C diff diarrhea tx and prevension. 4. McFarland LV. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhea and the treatment of Clostridium difficile disease, Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:812-822.

  13. RR 0.43 CI (0.31-0.58)

  14. Meta-analysis: McFarland • 13 of 25 trials (52%) showed AAD • Prevention of AAD: RR 0.43 (0.31-0.58) • NNT~8 • High heterogeneity Multiple subgroup analyses done to assess. No difference in adults vspeds. Most (90%) of studies were underpowered Likely 2/2 differences in population (age) and intervention (dose, strains)

  15. Metanalysis:Videlock • April 2012-Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics • 34 double-blind RCTs, 4138 pts: • All ages, all settings, pts on abx given probiotics for AAD prevention • Includes 20/25 studies from McFarland. • Thorough search strategy (Cochrane methodology) 5. Videlock EJ, Cremonini F. Meta-analysis: probiotics in antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, Aliment PharmacolTher 2012.

  16. Results:Videlock • Pooled data for AAD prevention RR 0.53 (0.44 to 0.63) NNT: 8 (using pooled raw data) • diffucult to interpret given heterogeniety • Significant heterogeneity • multiple subgroup analyses and metaregressions performed

  17. Subgroup Analyses:Videlock • All 34 trials: Pooled data RR 0.53 (0.44 to 0.63) • 24 adult trials: RR 0.53 (0.43-0.66) • 10 pediatric: RR 0.48 (0.35 to 0.65) • 13 Adult inpatient: RR 0.52 (0.38 to 0.72)

  18. Subgroup Analyses-Risk of Bias • 14 Low risk : RR 0.48 (0.35-0.68) • 10 Unclear risk: RR 0.48 (0.37-0.63) • 10 High risk: RR 0.62 (0.46-0.84)

  19. How to Explain the Heterogeniety? • Efficacy by Dose • Efficacy by treatment duration • Efficacy by Probiotic strain • Efficacy for inpatient adults

  20. Efficacy by Dose • Gao et al.7 RCT with 235 pts, using L. Acidophilus + L Casei placebovs50 billion vs100 billion CFUs Assessed AAD and C diff recurrence. 7. Gao XW, Mubasher M, Fang CY, Reifer C, Miller LE. Dose-response efficacy of a proprietary probiotic formula of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and Lactobacillus casei LBC80R for antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea prophylaxis in adult patients, Am J Gastroenterol2010;105:1636-1641.

  21. Dose Response: GaoAAD 50 Billion CFUs 100 Billion CFUs

  22. Dose Response: GaoC diff 50 Billion CFUs 100 Billion CFUs

  23. Efficacy by Dose • Johnston et al.8 Subgroup analysis <5b vs >5b CFUs/day for >5b: RR 0.53 (0.29-0.55) for <5b: RR 0.80 (0.53-1.21) Interaction p=0.01 • McFarland  >10 billion CFU dose more effective  8/12 (67%) high dose trials Efficacious vs 2/12 (17%) non-efficacious 8. Johnston BC, Goldenberg JZ, Vandvik PO, Sun X, Guyatt GH. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(11):CD004827.

  24. Efficacy by treatment duration • McFarland Tx duration range 5d-8wks NS difference • Videlock 16 trials- Equal to abx duration: RR 0.49 (0.38-0.63) 12 trials- 7d longer than abx: RR 0.53 (0.38-0.75)

  25. Efficacy by Probiotic Strain • McFarland- Only L. Rhamnosus GG, S. Boulardii and probiotic mixtures were effective • Johnston Only LGG, L Coagulans, and S. Boulardii effective • Videlock- Similar RR across all probiotic strains • L. GG 8 trials 847 pts: RR 0.40 (0.20-0.81) • S. Boulardii 7 trials 1007 pts: RR 0.46 (0.30-0.70) • Any lactobacilli 24 trials 2817 pts: RR 0.56 (0.45-0.69) • Bifidobacteria 10 trials 602 pts: RR 0.55(0.37-0.82)

  26. Lactobacilli Efficacy • Videlock Any lactobacilli 24 trials 2817 ptsRR 0.56 (0.45-0.69) • Kale-Pradhan- Lactobacilli meta-analysis9 10 RCTs, 1862 pts doses of 2-40 billion CFUs in Adults- RR 0.24 (0.08-0.75) 9. Kale-Pradhan PB, Jassal HK, Wilhelm SM. Role of Lactobacillus in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a meta-analysis, Pharmacotherapy 2010;30:119-126.

  27. Saccharomyces Boulardii Efficacy • Szajewska, 2005 Meta-analysis 5 RCTs, 1076 pts RR= 0.43 (0.23-0.78)  NNT of 10 • McFarland, 2010 Meta-analysis10 10 RCTs, pooled RR: 0.47 (0.35-0.63) • Videlock 2012- S. Boulardii Subgroup11 7 RCTs 1007 pts: RR 0.46 (0.30-0.70) 10. McFarland LV. Systematic review and meta-analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients, World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:2202-2222. 11. Szajewska H, Mrukowicz J. Meta-analysis: non-pathogenic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, Aliment PharmacolTher2005;22:365-372.

  28. S. Boulardii-McFarland 2010 RR: 0.47 (0.35-0.63)

  29. Efficacy in Hospitalized Adult Patients • Avadhani: meta-analysis of Inpatient adults. 8 RCTs AAD 1220 ptsRR 0.56 (0.44–0.71) C diff 471 ptsRR 0.29 (0.18–0.46) • Videlock : subgroup- 13 adult inpatient trials AAD 1693 pts: RR 0.52 (0.38 to 0.72) • 6 more inpatient trials currently ongoing

  30. What do the experts think? • American College of Gastroenterology formed “Yale Workshop on Probiotics”12 2011 update, Probiotics for AAD: level A recommendation for S. boulardii, LGG, and combo of L. casei, L. bulgaricus, • World Gastrenterology Association 2008 “In AAD, there is strong evidence of efficacy for S. boulardii or L. rhamnosus GG in adults” 12. Floch MH, Walker WA, Madsen K, Sanders ME, Macfarlane GT, Flint HJ, Dieleman LA, Ringel Y, Guandalini S, Kelly CP, Brandt LJ. Recommendations for probiotic use-2011 update, J ClinGastroenterol 2011;45 Suppl:S168-71.

  31. Safety:Population Studies • Salminen et al.13 Finland, 1990: L. Rhamnosus introduced into dairy 3 Trillion CFUs/person/year 11 cases of Lactobacillus bacteremia from 1990-2000 No increased incidence • Saxelin et al.14 4 year study in South Finland. No relation between Lacto. Bcx strains and those used buy food industry 13. Salminen MK, Lactobacillus bacteremia during a rapid increase in probiotic use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in Finland, Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:1155-1160. 14. Saxelin M, Chuang NH, Chassy B, Rautelin H, Makela PH, Salminen S, Gorbach SL. Lactobacilli and bacteremia in southern Finland, 1989-1992, Clin Infect Dis 1996;22:564-566.

  32. Safety:Clinical Trials • From 61-98’ 143 probiotic trials, 7,526 pts no adverse effects. no fungemiaor bacteremia • Videlock 2012 Meta-analysis 4138 pts no adverse events • Wolf et al. Blinded safety RCT on 39 HIV pts15 no adverse events. 15. Wolf BW, Wheeler KB, Ataya DG, Garleb KA. Safety and tolerance of Lactobacillus reuteri supplementation to a population infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, Food ChemToxicol 1998;36:1085-1094.

  33. Safety:Case Reports • Bacteremia: 6 cases 4 in children with short gut syndrome • Fungemia: 29 cases to date. 24 in ICUs, had CVCs, or immunosuppressed. 1 report of 2 neighbors being infected by fungus. 16. Boyle RJ, Robins-Browne RM, Tang ML. Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks? Am J ClinNutr 2006;83:1256-64; quiz 1446-7.

  34. Summary • Efficacy: Works for AAD prevention. NNT 5-10 • Dose: in the billions, more (>5-50 billion) is better • Duration: forduration of Abx therapy • Strains: Best evidence for S. Boulardii, LGG, and Mixed strains. • Safety: potentially fungemia- S. Boulardii in ICU pts, pts with central lines, and the immunosuppressed.

  35. Products Available Inpatient UNMH • Lactinex(L. Acidophilus and L. Bulgaricus) • Florastor(S. Boulardii) • Yoplait (commercial yogurt)

  36. Lactinex • L. Acidophilus and L Bulgaricus • 1 tab: 1 million CFUs • 1 pack granules: 100 million CFUs, • 100 tabs= 1 granule pack. • Cost of granules: $13 per 5 days, $0.86per packet • 2 trials on Lactinex for AAD prevention Gotz (1979): 79 inpatient Adults. NS Tankanow (1990): 38 outpatient peds. NS

  37. Florastor • Saccharomyces Boulardii • 5 Billion CFUsper 250mg capsule • Cost: $8 per 5 days, $0.79 per pill • Restricted to pediatric use only. • Great efficacy data

  38. Yoplait • Comercial Yogurt • One serving contains around 280 million CFUs of L. Acidophilus and S. Thermophilus17 • Cost: at 3 a day; $15 per 5 days…? • 2 RCTs on comercial Yogurt: 1 positive, 1 negative 17. Dunlap BS, Yu H, Elitsur Y. The probiotic content of commercial yogurts in west virginia, ClinPediatr (Phila) 2009;48:522-527.

  39. Saving the Hospital Money • Hickson et al.18 Cost to prevent 1 AAD: $100 Cost to prevent 1 C diff: $120 • Kyne et al.3 Cost per pt to treat C diff: $3,669 Cost of C diff in 2008: $3.2 billion 3. Kyne L, Hamel MB, Polavaram R, Kelly CP. Health care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile, Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:346-353. 18. Hickson M, D'Souza AL, Muthu N, Rogers TR, Want S, Rajkumar C, Bulpitt CJ. Use of probiotic Lactobacillus preparation to prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial, BMJ 2007;335:80.

  40. Recommendations • Get S. Boulardii approved for adults. • Once approved, use in all patients on antibiotics except those with central lines, the immunosuppressed, and ICU patients. • In the meantime, use Lactinex granules 2 packets TID mixed with Yogurt TID  ~1.5 billion CFUs/day

  41. Pro-biosorAnti-bios?

  42. 1. Doron SI, Hibberd PL, Gorbach SL. Probiotics for prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, J ClinGastroenterol2008;42 Suppl 2:S58-63. 2. Wistrom J, Norrby SR, Myhre EB, Eriksson S, Granstrom G, Lagergren L, Englund G, Nord CE, Svenungsson B. Frequency of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in 2462 antibiotic-treated hospitalized patients: a prospective study, J AntimicrobChemother2001;47:43-50. 3. Kyne L, Hamel MB, Polavaram R, Kelly CP. Health care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile, Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:346-353. 4. McFarland LV. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhea and the treatment of Clostridium difficile disease, Am J Gastroenterol2006;101:812-822. 5. Videlock EJ, Cremonini F. Meta-analysis: probiotics in antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, Aliment PharmacolTher2012. 6. Al-Eidan FA, McElnay JC, Scott MG, Kearney MP. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in hospitalised patients, J Clin Pharm Ther2000;25:101-109. 7. Gao XW, Mubasher M, Fang CY, Reifer C, Miller LE. Dose-response efficacy of a proprietary probiotic formula of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and Lactobacillus casei LBC80R for antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea prophylaxis in adult patients, Am J Gastroenterol2010;105:1636-1641. 8. Johnston BC, Goldenberg JZ, Vandvik PO, Sun X, Guyatt GH. Probiotics for the prevention of pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(11):CD004827. 9. Kale-Pradhan PB, Jassal HK, Wilhelm SM. Role of Lactobacillus in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a meta-analysis, Pharmacotherapy 2010;30:119-126. 10. McFarland LV. Systematic review and meta-analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients, World J Gastroenterol2010;16:2202-2222. 11. Szajewska H, Mrukowicz J. Meta-analysis: non-pathogenic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, Aliment PharmacolTher2005;22:365-372. 12. Floch MH, Walker WA, Madsen K, Sanders ME, Macfarlane GT, Flint HJ, Dieleman LA, Ringel Y, Guandalini S, Kelly CP, Brandt LJ. Recommendations for probiotic use-2011 update, J ClinGastroenterol2011;45 Suppl:S168-71. 13. Salminen MK, Tynkkynen S, Rautelin H, Saxelin M, Vaara M, Ruutu P, Sarna S, Valtonen V, Jarvinen A. Lactobacillus bacteremia during a rapid increase in probiotic use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in Finland, Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:1155-1160. 14. Saxelin M, Chuang NH, Chassy B, Rautelin H, Makela PH, Salminen S, Gorbach SL. Lactobacilli and bacteremia in southern Finland, 1989-1992, Clin Infect Dis 1996;22:564-566. 15. Wolf BW, Wheeler KB, Ataya DG, Garleb KA. Safety and tolerance of Lactobacillus reuteri supplementation to a population infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, Food ChemToxicol1998;36:1085-1094. 16. Boyle RJ, Robins-Browne RM, Tang ML. Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks? Am J ClinNutr2006;83:1256-64; quiz 1446-7. 17. Dunlap BS, Yu H, Elitsur Y. The probiotic content of commercial yogurts in west virginia, ClinPediatr (Phila) 2009;48:522-527. 18. Hickson M, D'Souza AL, Muthu N, Rogers TR, Want S, Rajkumar C, Bulpitt CJ. Use of probiotic Lactobacillus preparation to prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial, BMJ 2007;335:80.

More Related