400 likes | 745 Views
Week 14 Documents, visual methods, and other qualitative research sources and methods . Social Research Methods Alice Mah. “almost anything can be thought of as data.” - Seale 2004, p. 273. Lecture Outline. Personal and official documents Visual sociology and visual methods
E N D
Week 14 Documents, visual methods, and other qualitative research sources and methods Social Research Methods Alice Mah
“almost anything can be thought of as data.” - Seale 2004, p. 273
Lecture Outline • Personal and official documents • Visual sociology and visual methods • Focus: photo-elicitation interview method (including participant photography) • Visual, spatial and mobile methods • Focus: walking methods / ‘psychogeography’ (researching relationships between people & place) • Conclusions • Seminar: readings and activities
What are personal and official documents? • History is defined by those who write stories • And (most often) victors get to be the ones who write • Documents provide access to a world we cannot observe… but a manufactured and created view • Tend to think of written documents • But these also include audio and visual documents
What are personal and official documents? • Distinction between oral accounts, observations and written records • Social researchers tend to concentrate on certain categories of documents • Public records • Media reports • Private documents • Organisational records • Personal data includes: • Written records upon which historians/sociologists concentrate • But also oral information (e.g. oral or life histories; recordings are often deposited in archives/local libraries)
Official documents • Documents generated by the state, city, a corporation, or other ‘authority’, eg: • Administrative material created by government • Reports, discussion papers, legislation • Official statistics • Organisational documents • Patient files • Social worker case notes • Training manuals • Company reports • City Council minutes
Diaries and memoirs • Diaries is a generic term that includes: • Logs • Kept by a research informant • Documented evidence produced as part of self-record of activities and attitudes (eg Time use surveys) • Journals • An account kept by a researcher of a face-to-face interview • Record of respondent’s retrospective recall of activities and attitudes • Diary • An account kept by the researcher that records the research
Autobiographical accounts • Not produced for the purposes of research • Accounts of the famous • Accounts of the powerful • Accounts of ‘ordinary lives’ • Make visible the lives of the previously silenced • Those whom historically have been ignored or marginalised • But, majority from middle and upper class perspectives (Burgess, 1993: 91)
Media Sources • Newspapers • Newspaper archives: http://www.bl.uk/collections/newspapers.html) • Magazines • Internet (see Hamman -reading 43- in Seale reader, and online ethnography slides) • TV • Film (many accessible through film archives; Warwick Library also has a collection) • BFI's National Film and Television Archive • Imperial War Museum Film and Video Archive • Scottish Screen Archive • National Screen and Sound Archive of Wales • 8 English regional film archives
Archives • National, state, local, interest group/ institutional archives • Texts, images, audio and video recordings, including a range of official and personal documents Limitations of archival documents: • Snapshots of time; purpose/ intent • Elites/ non-elites • Global north/ south • Questions re: truth and objectivity • Re: digital/virtual archives in particular: lack of context; digital exclusion; loss of “materiality” as data
Selected list of archives • http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ • http://www.theherbert.org/index.php/home/history-centre/history-centre-collections • http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/mrc • http://parlipapers.chadwyck.co.uk/marketing/index.jsp • http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/LGNL_Services/Leisure_and_culture/Records_and_archives/ • http://www.bl.uk/catalogues/indiaofficeselect/welcome.asp • http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/thewomenslibrary/ • http://library.wellcome.ac.uk/?gclid=COLNu_DLiKECFSaElAodgFRpNw • http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/ • http://www.imagesofempire.com/bin/empire.dll/go?a=disp&t=home-loader.html&_max=0&_maxlb=0&si= • http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/search?adv=y
Analysis of documentary material • May (1993) suggests analysis needs to consider • Authenticity • Representativeness • Credibility • Meaning • Look at the context in which the document is produced (eg socio-cultural context) • Further discussion on analysis in weeks 14 and 15…
Visual sociology • ‘Seeing comes before words… and establishes our place in the surrounding world.’ (John Berger, 1977, Ways of Seeing, p. 7) • Visual material is a central to the social realm, not simply a way we can study. We cannot understand social life without considering the visual aspects of social life. • Brief history of visual methods: 19th-20th century: photo-journalists and documentary photographers, use of film and photography in social anthropology, social investigators and social reformers as photographers; visual sociology established in 1980s, developed in the 1990s, and is now increasingly popular (digital age). • Visual methodologies produce rich data, are open to a range of interpretations, and can provide insights into producers of visual material, consumers of visual material, and social contexts of image production and consumption.
Visual methods • Three types of visual methods (Banks, 2001): • making visual representations (studying society by producing images) • examining pre-existing visual representations (studying images for information about society) • collaborating with social actors in the production of visual representations • Different types of visual material • two-dimensional pictures- drawings, maps, diagrams and charts, photographs, paintings, etc. • moving or electronic images, for example TV, video and film, websites • material objects themselves, such as toys, homes, streets, signs • Visual methods can be used as stand-alone methods or as complementary with other qualitative methods such as interviews and participant observation.
Focus: photo-elicitation interviews • Photo-elicitation interviews: researchers introduce photographs into the interview context • Photographs may be researcher-produced, existing photographs, or produced by research participants • Three main uses of photographs (Harper, 2002): • As visual inventories of people, objects and artefacts • As depictions of events that are part of collective or institutional paths (photographs of schools or events) • As intimate dimensions of the social (photos of family, friends, the self, the body) • Advantages: ease rapport, provide structure, prompt questions, richer data, greater balance of power dynamics • Challenges: confidentiality, ethics, trust, technical skill, sensitivity to context, power relations
Example of photo-elicitation ‘auto-driven’ interview instructions, Clark-Ibáñez
Byrne and Doyle: photo-elicitation with focus groups, using existing mining images
Byrne and Doyle: photo-elicitation with focus groups, using existing mining images
Les Back: participant street photography, Brick Lane, East London
Les Back: participant street photography, Brick Lane, East London
Spatial Methods • ‘Spatial’ methods: Particularly useful for investigating relationships between people, images, places and objects (meanings, understandings) and for gaining deeper qualitative insights • Examples of places/spaces: communities, cities, neighbourhoods, homes, public spaces, parks, rural spaces, natural spaces, confined places, policed places, streets • Material culture studies (Daniel Miller- see course extracts) people’s relationships with objects, photos, materials • Site observations (drawing maps, photographing areas of research; spatial part of ethnographic lens) • Mobile methods: researching while on the move (participant and/or researcher), conducive to spatial research • Research example: Diary-photo diary-interview method (Latham), time-space diagram, diary, photo and interview as complementary
Focus: walking methods and psychogeography • ‘Walking whilst talking’ (or driving or on public transport): research participants guide researchers through places: city streets, neighbourhoods, shops, churches, parks, and talk about meanings, memories and ideas related to places. Informal, good for rapport, multi-sensory, rich material. • Psychogeography: researchers explore the social and psychological impacts of places on people; primary method through researcher walking and observing. Earlier antecedents: Walter Benjamin’s flaneur and George Simmel’s Metropolis and Mental Life, 1903; ‘founded’ by Guy Debord 1955, contemporary example: Ian Sinclair’s London Orbital). • Criticisms: spectator/voyeuristic/detached/popular.
Research example: Industrial Ruination, Community, and Place (Mah 2012) • See in particular chapter 5 ‘Reading landscapes of ruination, deprivation, and decline,’ pp. 129-152 • Outlines social and spatial analysis approach of ‘reading’ social and spatial landscapes of industrial and urban decline • Combines visual, spatial, mobile, and ethnographic methods
Driving tours with research participant in Ivanovo, Russia: Mah
Driving tour with research participant (taxi driver) in Walker, Newcastle: Mah
Conclusions • There are a number of possibilities for collecting qualitative data… depending on your research question(s)… be creative! • Further possibilities: • using the senses more widely in social research (smell, sound…) • using video and social media • collaborative (co-produced) research • combining qualitative methods
Seminars • This week: bring a short video, document, image, or object for analysis, practical exercises and discussions in small groups. • Readings: first two short readings in the Seale reader, plus journal article by Pink! • For next week: download NVivo to your laptops and bring to seminars! Available on: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/its/servicessupport/software/nvivo