290 likes | 319 Views
Learn about assessing sustainable development impacts for climate mitigation, key elements, approaches, and indicators. Understand the importance of monitoring methods and how to optimize specific impacts. Contact Adriaan Korthuis for more information.
E N D
Assessing sustainable development impacts Adriaan Korthuis African Regional Workshop on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions Kigali, 18 August 2015
1. WHY?
Different purposes • Internal evaluation • Enabling improvement of the NAMA. Sustainable development is a primary driver behind climate mitigation and adaptation policies and projects. • 2. UNFCCC periodic reporting • Compliance with reporting on progress • 3. Donor progress reporting • Coordinate sustainable development impacts with donor country/institution
2 WHAT?
Elements Approaches Objectives What do we monitor? Tracking project implementation and progress, e.g., for results-based payments Progress monitoring GHG emission reductions Quantifying the climate impact in tCO2e NAMA Monitoring Safeguards Avoiding negative impact, e.g. do-no-harm assessments Social, economic and environmental evaluation Stakeholder consultation Ensuring public consent and receiving feedback SD impact monitoring Evaluating the contribution to sustainable development
What is important when choosing monitoring methods and indicators? (I)
What is important when choosing monitoring methods and indicators?
Policy NAMAs SD indicator monitoring SDIs monitor progress on the EU Sustainable Development Strategy (EU SDS). Target progress towards meeting MDGs and support data gathering 60 indicators with a shortlist of 24 25-30 indicators
Project NAMA SD indicator monitoring • Clear MRV cycle • Uses “do-no-harm” criteria and SD matrix • Often survey based or derivedfrom GHG data • Clear MRV cycle • Voluntary CDM SD Tool (2012) provides indicators
Melbourne Circle of sustainability Design the NAMA to optimise specific impacts: trade-offs.
3. HOW?
Example of a causal chain Source: The PMR, Ricardo AEA
Indicator baselines • Types of baselines: • Extrapolation of the historic trend • Using a reference group • Absolute or relative (account for changes in activity levels)
Operationalising indicators • What will we actually measure? • Use proxies • Use data that is already gathered (national statistics?) • Translate carbon data into co-benefits
Signal vs Noise: attributing impact Source: the Economist.
Time • Some impacts take more time to develop. Impact When operationalising: define the frequency of monitoring. Time Impact Time
Scale • At which scale to monitor. Institution Community Ecosystem Country World
Examples of monitoring approaches • Surveys • Manual or MRV+ (smartphone-based) • E.g. Time saved on wood gathering • E.g. Impact on perceived well-being • Metering • If possible and cost-effective • E.g. Samples of institutions weight their wood consumption before and after • E.g. kWh renewable electricity produced • National statistics • If available and specific enough. • E.g. Hospital cases of respiratory diseases per 100,000 capita. • E.g. Children under XXX diagnosed with asthma per 100,000 capita.
Contact • Adriaan Korthuis • a.korthuis@climatefocus.com • Phone +31 20 262 10 31 • www.climatefocus.com