150 likes | 174 Views
GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX. NGWATU P PAEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGIST. LPR. the retrograde flow of stomach content to the larynx and pharynx whereby this material comes in contact with the upper aerodigestive tract.
E N D
GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX NGWATU P PAEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGIST
LPR • the retrograde flow of stomach content to the larynx and pharynx whereby this material comes in contact with the upper aerodigestive tract. • is associated with symptoms of laryngeal irritation such as throat clearing, coughing, and hoarseness. • The most common laryngoscopic signs are redness and swelling of the throat
physiological barriers to LPR • LES • ESOPHAGEAL CLEARANCE influenced by esophageal peristalsis, saliva and gravity, and • the UES. stomach content comes in contact with the laryngopharyngeal tissue, causing damage to the epithelium, ciliary dysfunction, inflammation, and altered sensitivity
GER • the passage of gastric contents into the esophagus with or without regurgitation and/or vomiting. • GERD • symptoms of infant GERD vary widely and may include excessive crying, back arching, regurgitation and irritability. • Many of these symptoms, however, occur in all babies with or without GERD, making a definitive diagnosis challenging.
Non acid reflux • Nonacid reflux has been associated with inflammation in both LPR and GERD • The reflux of duodenal-gastric juices contains bile acids and pancreatic secretions and can reach the larynx • pepsin is actively transported into laryngeal epithelial cells and remains stable at pH 7.4, but is irreversibly inactivated at pH 8. After pepsin is reactivated by a decline from pH 7.4 to pH 3, 72% of peptic activity remains.
history • The history should include the age of onset of symptoms, a thorough feeding and dietary history (e.g. length of feeding period, volume of each feed, type of formula, quality of milk supply when breast feeding, methods of mixing the formula, size of the feeds, additives to the feeds, restriction of allergens, time interval between feeding), the pattern of regurgitation/spitting/vomiting (e.g. nocturnal, immediately post prandial, long after meals, digested versus undigested), a family medical history, possible environmental triggers (including family psychosocial history and factors such as tobacco use and second-hand tobacco smoke-exposure), the patient’s growth trajectory, prior pharmacologic and dietary interventions and the presence of warning signs
Endoscopy and Biopsy • EGD has three roles in the evaluation of symptomatic children: to diagnose erosive esophagitis, to diagnose microscopic esophagitis, and to diagnose other conditions mimicking GERD. • GERD may be present despite normal endoscopic appearance of the esophageal mucosa as well as in the absence of histological abnormalities
Barium Contrast Radiography (Upper GI Series) • Not useful for the diagnosis of GERD • reflux events can be detected in as many as 50% of children undergoing radiologic imaging, regardless of symptoms • Useful for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract anatomic abnormalities such as esophageal stricture, hiatal hernia, intestinal mal-rotation, achalasia, tof, pyloric stenosis
Nuclear Scintigraphy • May have a role in patients with chronic or refractory respiratory symptoms, to diagnose pulmonary aspiration of refluxed gastric contents • Not routinely recommended in patients with other potentially reflux-related symptoms
Prokinetics • The potential benefits (i.e. reduction of reflux-related symptoms, in particular, regurgitation or vomiting) of currently available prokinetic agents are outweighed by their potential side effects There is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of metoclopramide,erythromycin, bethanechol or domperidone for GERD
buffering agents • chronic therapy with alginates and sucralfate is not recommended for GERD
microbiome • pre-and probiotics have not been adequately studied and may pose more risk and cost so therefore cannot be recommended for the reduction of symptoms of GERD in infants and children.
Surgery • Should be considered only in children with an established diagnosis of GERD and failure of optimized medical therapy; or long-term dependence on medical therapy