1 / 23

Dramatic Criticism on Taming of the Shrew

Dramatic Criticism on Taming of the Shrew. And the Elements of Drama. The playworld of a play?. The imaginative environment that a play asks us to enter when we read it, or see it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The Taming of the Shrew (Renaissance Padua, Italy)

hilda-haney
Download Presentation

Dramatic Criticism on Taming of the Shrew

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dramatic Criticism on Taming of the Shrew And the Elements of Drama

  2. The playworld of a play? • The imaginative environment • that a play asks us to enter • when we read it, or see it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ • The Taming of the Shrew (Renaissance Padua, Italy) • Top Girls (20th century London)

  3. Essay question on Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew • “Bianca and Lucentio are in fact seminal characters, instrumental in understanding Katherina and Petruchio.” • How successful is the sub-plot in affirming the transformation of Katherina in the main plot? • Question is asking you to examine and analyze the dramatic function / roles of Bianca and Lucentio in the sub-plot in relation to the main plot of Petruchio and Katherina;

  4. Responding effectively • Address and engage the focus of the question, and all its requirements; • Demonstrate keen relevant insights; developed by a line of argument, supported by relevant supporting textual evidence • Followed by analysis of dramatic devices in relation to relevant central concerns • Comprehensive coverage; • Presented in a structurally coherent manner

  5. The two plots function to parallel each other; parallelism as a dramatic technique; • The two plots also contrast with each other; antithesis as a dramatic technique; • Shakespeare appears to be presenting Katherina, the shrew, as being ultimately tamed in the main plot; • While the opposite is the case where the presentation of Bianca is concerned in the sub-plot; this female rebel pleases herself by appearing to conform; • Bianca deceives others by assuming an appearance of good and gentle womanhood; • Only at the end do others see Bianca’s true colours

  6. Representations (linguistically; through language; stereotypically or atypically?) • Roles (in a play, dramatic roles / functions in relation to the plot of the play) • Relationships (male-female character relationships)

  7. We strive to get true representations of reality • Such as • Beliefs and statements • Vocabularies and conceptual schemes • Any number of different systems of representation for representing the same reality

  8. Nursery rhyme representation of gender • What are little boys made of? What are little boys made of? Boys are made of slugs and snails and puppy dogs’ tails; That’s what little boys are made of. • What are little girls made of? What are little girls made of? Girls are made of sugar and spice and all that’s nice; That’s what little girls are made of.

  9. Conventional formula for Drama • People go to a play in the theatre to be entertained, rather than to be improved; A possible formula for the delivery of such theatrical entertainment: • simple action; • easily recognizable characters; • intrigue, and secrets; • points of crisis and entanglement; • a just conclusion to the play

  10. The well made / well crafted play? • As well as having dramatically interesting characters • Is driven by a good plot; • At its most basic, the characters of a stage play are mere dramatic devices (somewhat similar to characters in a computer game) • The characters of a play are placed there to make the plot of the play work, and entertain; • For example the dramatist’s use of ‘stock’ characters • Characters easily taken down from the shelf; and held in stock for repeated use

  11. Stock characters • Since a play must have conflict to be entertaining for its audience • Must therefore have characters assuming different conflicting roles • Goodies and Baddies • Heroes and Villains Mixtures • Those that appear good but are not; • Those that appear bad but are good;

  12. Stage characters and audience expectations • We expect to be able to place stage characters in a recognizable social type (e.g. Katherina Minola?) • Also that they have hidden depths to their personality that will only gradually become apparent to us; • We expect that their MOTIVES will only gradually become discernible, as we match their actions to their words • And that we become aware of the implications of what they say, as much as the surface content; • We expect that the story of their past has some bearing on their behaviour in the present; • And we expect them to adapt to changing circumstances, to develop;

  13. Understanding character role in terms drama based criticism • Role in the play (TS) of Baptista Minola? • Conventional, typical Renaissance patriarch; paterfamilias; concerned about his daughters; • Role of Lucentio (TS)? In relation to other characters, and also in relation plot development? • Lucentio is presented in the role of the young, good looking, gallant, idealistic type wooer, yet rather ridiculous in his romantic aspirations; • His role is also intended to be a foil; a counter-opposite for Petruchio; (that is his dramatic function) • NOTE: df. A foil is a secondary character who contrasts with a major character;

  14. Three aspects of stage characters • 1) Character conception • Is the character simply drawn, or complex? • The dramatic character is conceived simply on the basis of a gender or racial stereotype? • E.g. Re- Taming of the Shrew; Stereotypically female? Stereotypically Italiano? • Complex characterization is considered the best standard; but of course some characters are considered simpler than others;

  15. Stage Characters and Role  Plot • NOTE: Characters in a play are mere devices placed in the play to make the plot work / function; • An important aspect of the vast majority of stage characters is their plot function; • If a character is being used as a foil, this is purely for the benefit of the audience; (We do not have foils in real life); • A character’s function / role as a foil is specific to drama based fiction;

  16. What is the main function of characters in drama, in dramatic terms? • To serve the plot of the play; • Pope Joan? Her stage character role? • Her role is meant to parallel and at the same time ironically juxtapose / contrast that of Marlene in order to develop the plot.

  17. Character development • Character development / dynamics are clearly very much linked to / tied up / intertwined with the plot; • Characters change because of what happens in the unfolding action of the plot; • Plot and character are inter-dependant

  18. Formal Function of Stage Character • Aspects of character which are specific to the rhetorical dimension of the play • The way the play ‘speaks to’ its audience; • Through the way characters function as narrators, confidantes, and foils

  19. Character and aesthetic function;Aesthetic aspect of character in drama • Stage characters can provide the audience with much direct pleasure by the way they speak; the way they say what they say • And because of the way they behave; either their outlandish, or stereotypical behaviour; • E.g. Petruchio in The Taming of the Shrew

  20. Moral types of character • Social types of character; • What of Katherina? What type is she? • Katherina is presented as a stereotype; • Katherina has a stereotypical role to play; • She is the stage woman scold / shrew who must be punished and reformed for her waywardness; • She is required by the genre (comedy) to change; • Katherina’s relationship with other female characters? • Inevitably confrontational; oppositional;

  21. Pitfalls to be avoided: • 1 You must not think about, or see Stage Characters in the same way you think about or see real people; • The Julius Caesar of history, and drama, different; • 2 One cannot think about stage persons in isolation from other characters; • 3 Nor in isolation from the development of the plot; • 4 Do not ever simply describe a character; one must show how the character is presented through analytical commentary on dramatic techniques used by the playwright to present a given character; • 5 Do not confuse qualities of a character, and role;

  22. Study of stage characters in Drama • Assess the role or function that the character performs in the play; • Examine in detail the key speeches that the character makes, and the key acts / scenes in which s/he appears; • Gather a representative range of evidence from the play to support your view of the stage character, and his / her Role in the play’s plot structure; • And Relationship with other characters;

  23. Theatrical qualities of Petruchio’s role • Petruchio is cast in the dramatic role of the leading suitor / wooer of Katherina; • And portrayed as the most masculine and dominant male character; (contrasts with Lucentio, Hortensio, and Gremio, mere wimps, by comparison) • Is he presented as a playful, macho suitor or a misogynistic bully? • That depends on whether we as an audience are compelled to think that Katherina has gained or lost by meeting him, and ending up being married to him;

More Related