1 / 36

Nat Geogr. map

Serviços Macrossistêmicos da Amazônia brasileira: visão sob a ótica da escala da Economia Ecológica Philip M. Fearnside Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA http://philip.inpa.gov.br

hilda-rivera
Download Presentation

Nat Geogr. map

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Serviços Macrossistêmicos da Amazônia brasileira: visão sob a ótica da escala da Economia Ecológica Philip M. Fearnside Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA http://philip.inpa.gov.br VIII Encontro da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Ecológica (ECOECO), Hotel Fazenda Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, 05 de agosto de 2009

  2. Nat Geogr. map

  3. (a) Valores da revisão de Salati (2001), exceto o último item. (b) Porcentagem em comparação com a vazão média na foz.

  4. Fonte: http://ar.geocities.com/lapaginaderionegroyneuquen/temas/salltej.htm

  5. 202 mil toneladas de vapor de água por segundo em uma área de aproximadamente 6 milhões de quilômetros quadrados Equivalem a aproximadamente 1 metro de água líquida no ano -184 - 184 Unidade: 106 kg/s Correia, 2005 Domínio: (76,2W – 47,6W; 13,2S – 5,5N)

  6. Desmatamento 2002/2003 Desmatamento até 2002 Fonte: INPE PRODES Digital, 2004.

  7. Fonte: Desmatamento - INPE; Vegetação – IBGE; Mapa: SIGLAB/INPA

  8. BIOMASSA ABAIXO E ACIMA DO SOLO (PESO SECO) PARA A AMAZÔNIA LEGAL BRASILEIRA BASEADO EM 2860 PARCELAS INVENTARIADAS PELO PROJETO RADAMBRASIL (PROJETO RADAMBRASIL, 1973-1983), EXCLUINDO SAVANA, CAPINARANA, FORMAÇÕES SECUNDÁRIAS OU PIONEIRAS. 12

  9. Vegetação Original

  10. Biomassa Original

  11. Perda de vegetação original (Desmatamento + Corte de Cerrado

  12. (Plano Nacional sobre Mudança do Clima, p. 67)

  13. (Comunicação Nacional, p. 146)

  14. Emissões do corte do Cerrado: (Comunicação Nacional, p. 146)

  15. Folha de S. Paulo 19/04/09 p. A-24.

  16. Florestas podem prejudicar mercado de carbono, diz Greenpeace Os preços do mercado de carbono podem despencar 75 por cento se os créditos para a salvaguarda de florestas forem acrescidos aos mercados para as emissões industriais, disse a entidade ambientalista Greenpeace na segunda-feira (30). Estadão Online 31 Mar. 2009

  17. Gasto total ($) Carbono total (t) = ---------------------- Preço medio ($/t)

  18. Wunder et al. 2008, p. 32

  19. the anticipated supply of REDD credits will depress global carbon prices around 60% if commitments are not increased or if there are no supplementarity restrictions. (KEA 3, 2009, p. 18)

  20. Forest credits in the carbon market? On forest protection, Greenpeace supports the establishment of a multilateral forest fund replenished through increased public financial support. Furthermore, economic analysis shows that countries like China, India and Brazil could lose tens of billions of dollars for clean energy investments under the carbon market mechanisms, if forest protection measures are included in the carbon market. Greenpeace calls on all Parties to oppose the inclusion of REDD in the carbon market mechanisms. (Greenpeace, 2009. Bridging the Gap for Real Emission Reductions )

  21. Greenpeace, 2008

  22. In contrast [to carbon credit for REDD] , a fund for forests could be designed to compensate countries only for foregone costs of not deforesting. The result would be more efficient expenditure of limited mitigation resources and lower overall compliance costs for industrialised countries. Greenpeace, 2008, Forests for Climate, p. 19

  23. It [REDD] … takes the focus off of the need for countries historically responsible for the climate crisis to reduce emissions at home. Greenpeace, 2008, Forests for Climate, p. 14

  24. it is unclear if, in the absence of the cost-moderating effects of REDD, the ambitious goals proposed by the IPCC will be agreed. (KEA 3, 2009, p. 21)

  25. http://philip.inpa.gov.br

More Related