270 likes | 403 Views
Unkown stellar mass loss at low metallicity. Henny Lamers Astronomical Institute and SRON Laboratory for Space Research Utrecht University. Topics to be discussed. Predictions of properties of “normal” winds (Z~solar) and comparison with observations
E N D
Unkown stellar mass loss at low metallicity Henny Lamers Astronomical Institute and SRON Laboratory for Space Research Utrecht University
Topics to be discussed Predictions of properties of “normal” winds (Z~solar) and comparison with observations Predicted properties of low Z winds (Z~10-4 solar) Extremely no Z winds (H and He only)
Net force in wind: gnet = - gN + ge + glines > 0 Gravity : gN = GM / R2 Rad pressure by electrons : ge = σe L / 4 π R2 c = Γe gN Rad pressure by lines: gl = ge M(t) Force multiplier: M(t) = k t-α (ne/W)δ Solar Z : k ~ 1/30 α ~ 0.6 δ ~ 0.1 Castor, Abbott & Klein 1975, CAK
Predictions: scaling laws Castor, Abbott, Klein 1975 v∞ ~ (2 to 3)v esc ~ √ (M/R) Mdot ~ L 1/α M (α-1)/α
Predictions: scaling laws Castor, Abbott, Klein 1975 v∞ ~ (2 to 3)v esc ~ √ (M/R) Mdot ~ L 1/α M (α-1)/α ↓ Kudritzki et al 1989 П≡ Mdotv∞√ R ~L 1/α M 0.5-(1-α)/α ~ L 1/α П = Modified wind momentum
Predicted mass loss rates Vink et al. 2000
Modified wind momentum П↔ L predictions Log П observations Vink et al. 2000
New study with improved mass loss rates Galactic stars Markova et al. 2004
Problem: Some stars with very similar stellar parameters show a large difference in mass loss rate and wind properties !!
“Tale of two stars” AV 83 AV 69 Type O7 Iaf+ O7.5 III L/Lsun 3.5 105 4.1 105 Teff 32800 33900 R/Rsun 18.5 18.6 He/H 0.2 0.1 C/N 0.15 15 Hillier et al. 2003
AV 83 and AV 69: very different winds! Hillier et al. 2003
AV 83 AV 69 Mdot 7 10-7 9 10-7 V∞ 940 1800 β 2.0 1.0 fclump 0.1 1 ROTATION !!! Hillier et al. 2003
Effects of rotation • Flattening • 2. Gravity = f( θ) • 3. Teff = f(θ ) • 4. Mdot = f(θ) • 5. Vwind = f(θ) • 6. Spect type = f(sin i) Meynet & Maeder 2002
The wind of a fast rotating hot supergiant J. Bjorkman 2005
Predictions for line driven winds 10-2 < Z/Zsun <10+1 Mdot ~ Z 0.85 Vink et al. 2001
Observations ↔ Predictions LMC SMC Vink et al. 2001
The problem of the winds of low luminosity SMC stars Black = Gal Red = LMC Blue = SMC П↔L relation breaks down at log L < 5.3 !! Martins et al. 2004
Predictions at low Zparameters k, α, δ vary with distance Z/Zsun 1.0 0.2 10-2 10-3 10-4 П Kudritzki 2002
Very low Z stars only have winds when they are close to Eddington limit ! grad = ge + glines > gN at some depth glines = M(t) ge Mmax ≈ 2000 Z/Zsun + M(H,He) from atomic physics So maximumradiation pressure is gradmax = (1+Mmax) ge = (1+Mmax) Γe gN > gN Γe > (1+Mmax)-1
Dependence of mass loss on Γe ← Mdot ≈ 10-8 Msun/yr Kudritzki 2002
Zero metallicity stars 1. Radiation pressure only due to H and He lines 2. H lines alone are never strong enough 3. HeII lines can produce grad-gN >0 if level populations are just right but only in very small region of atmosphere. Krticka & Kubat, 2005
geff > 0 only in very small zone Zero metallicity stars have NO line driven winds !! Krticka & Kubat 2005
Conclusions A: 10-3 < Z/Zsun < 10 : Mdot ~ Z0.85 but : Mdot depends on (fast) rotation B: 10-4 < Z/Zsun < 10-3 : Mdot ~only for large Γe Γe > (1+Mmax)-1 Mmax ≈ 2000 Z/Zsun C: Z/Zsun=0 : no line driven wind, Mdot < 10 -10 Msun/yr