340 likes | 547 Views
Stratocumulus – Theory and Model Irina Sandu and Martin Kohler. Motivation Characterisation Governing processes Parameterization Remaining Challenges Summary. Stratocumulus - Motivation. Cover in (annual) mean 29% of the planet (Klein and Hartmann, 1993)
E N D
Stratocumulus – Theory and ModelIrina Sandu and Martin Kohler • Motivation • Characterisation • Governing processes • Parameterization • Remaining Challenges • Summary
Stratocumulus - Motivation • Cover in (annual) mean 29% of the planet (Klein and Hartmann, 1993) • Cloud top albedo is 50-80% (in contrast to 7 % at ocean surface). • A 4% increase in global stratocumulus extend would offset 2-3K global warming from CO2 doubling (Randall et al. 1984). • Coupled models have large biases in stratocumulus extent and SSTs.
Annual Stratus Cloud Amount Californian Arctic North Atlantic North Pacific Canarian China Australian Namibian Peruvian Circumpolar Ocean Surface based observations (mean=29%) Klein & Hartmann 1993
Stratocumulus over ocean Peru EPIC 16-21Oct2001 Chile SST & surface wind MODIS true color (1540UTC, 20 Oct. 2001)
Stratocumulus … over Land Germany Yellowstone,USA Stratocumulus stratiformis translucidus Stratocumulus stratiformis opacus cumulogenitus Bernhard Mühr, www.wolkenatlas.de
Stratocumulus …Macroscales closed cells with diameter: 10-15km MISR sensor on Terra satellite visibleearth.nasa.gov
Stratocumulus ….Microscales or Cloud microphysics Drizzle drops ~ 40 µm <D < 100-500 µm Precipitation embryos: D ~ 40 µm CCN : D ~ 0.01-10 µm Cloud droplets : ~ 1 µm < D < ~ 40 µm Entrainement of warm and dry air Mixing n(D) Cloud droplet sedimentation D 40 µm Collection Condensation n(D) ECS n(D) D 40 µm D 40 µm Drizzle sedimentation CCN activation n(D) w Drizzle evaporation D 40 µm
Characterisation of a STBL hSTBL (m) LWP (kg m-2) (Liquid Water Path) rt (g kg-1) rsat θl(K) (g kg-1) Subsidence 0.2g/kg STBL 20g/kg
Characterisation of a STBL Subsidence hSTBL (m) STBL 0.2g/kg LWP (kg m-2) 20g/kg (Liquid Water Path) rt (g kg-1) rsat θl(K) (g kg-1) Such a cloudy system is extremely sensitive to thermodynamical conditions
Characterisation of a STBL Subsidence hSTBL (m) STBL LWP (kg m-2) (Liquid Water Path) rt (g kg-1) rsat θl(K) (g kg-1) Such a cloudy system is extremely sensitive to thermodynamical conditions
Characterisation of a STBL Subsidence hSTBL (m) STBL LWP (kg m-2) 0.6K (Liquid Water Path) rt (kg kg-1) rsat θl(K) (kg kg-1) Such a cloudy system is extremely sensitive to thermodynamical conditions
1D representation of the STBL (I) Conserved variables Cloud water content Droplet concentration 0 0 • Adiabatic model : no exchange with the exterior
1D representation of the STBL (II) LW SW Cloud top entrainment drizzle LW H LE • Non adiabatic system • Influenced by: • radiation • entrainment • surface fluxes • drizzle
Radiative transfer TFT << Tcloud Strong cooling Tcloud Tsea Slight warming v decoupling Strong downdrafts • LW radiation Compensating updrafts • SW radiation • partially compensates LW cooling • Stabilises the cloud layer • Slight inversion at the cloud base • The cloud water content diminishes
Cloud top entrainment Cloud top entrainment LW cooling turbulence • Entrained air cools • Cloudy air warms, a part of liquid water evaporates • LWC at cloud top inferior to adiabatic case • Growth of the STBL • Warming and drying of the STBL
Cloud top entrainment More entrainment Stronger heating Positive feedback = Colder than cloudy air Rapid cloud dissipation Cloud top entrainment instability • growth of the STBL, warming and heating, partially compensates the radiative cooling, modifies cloud droplet distribution.
Surface fluxes • Sensible heat flux (H) • Important for maintaining turbulence in the under cloud layer • Latent heat flux • Vapour supply for the cloud layer • Role in the cloud break up (transition to shallow cumulus)
Precipitation flux • Even if weak (1mm/day) important for STBL dynamics and energetics • Precipitation flux ~ 30 W/m2 (same as latent flux!) • Latent heat released during drizzle formation acts to weaken the vertical movements
Precipitation flux v stable Scenario I LE LE v stable Scenario II decoupling Cumulus unstable • Under cloud evaporation affects the dynamics of the boundary layer drizzle
The real STBL (3D) Large scale subsidence LW SW Cloud top entrainment ? What else drizzle drizzle Horizontal advection Large scale advection LW H LE 3D 1D
The diurnal cycle of a non-precipitating stratocumulus Night-time LW radiative cooling The cloud deepens Well-mixed Warm, dry,subsiding free-troposphere l qt ql Entrainment warming, drying ql,adiabatic Surface heat and moisture fluxes Courtesy of Bjorn Stevens (data from DYCOMS-II)
The diurnal cycle of a non-precipitating stratocumulus The cloud thins Decoupled Daytime Warm, dry, subsiding free-troposphere l qt ql Entrainment warming, drying LW radiative cooling ql,adiabatic SW absorption Stabilisation of the subcloud layer Surface heat and moisture fluxes Courtesy of Bjorn Stevens (data from DYCOMS-II)
Diurnal cycle during observed during FIRE-I experiment Cloud top LWP Cloud base 8 LT 12 LT 16 LT 20LT 0LT Hignett, 1991 (data from FIRE-I)
Stratocumulus parameterization - Ingredients • Strong mixing • Cloud top driven • Surface driven • Cloud top entrainment • function of cloud top radiative cooling and surface flux • Radiation interaction • Drizzle • Transition to trade cumulus • high/low cloud fraction
Old ECMWF Stratocumulus Parameterization – a web shallow convection • dry diffusion • variable: dry static energy and WV • PBL top entrainment: • shallow convection • closure: moist static energy equilibrium in sub-cloud layer • updraft entrainment/detrainment: • cloud formation: detrainment of cloud volume and cloud water • cloud • supersaturation removal into cloud • cloud top entrainment: • radiation • resolution: every 3 hours and every 4th point dry diffusion
unification – an ED/MF approach zi K next done zcb zi M2 M1 M M Kbot Ktop Kbot Kbot Stratocumulus dry BL Shallow cumulus Deep cumulus Combined mass flux/diffusion: Kentr
updraft model: entrainment: , τ=500s, c=0.55 detrainment: 3·10-4 m-1 in cloud parcel determines PBL depth (wup= 0) mass flux: parameterization choices • cloud cover: • total water variance equation not yet Mass-flux K-diffusion • diffusion: • K-profile to represent the surface driven diffusion • Ktop ~ FLW to represent the cloud top driven diffusion • cloud top entrainment: cloud variability
Results: Low cloud cover (new-old) T511 time=10d n=140 2001 & 2004 old: CY28R4 new PBL
Winter Cloud Cover: 36h forecast versus SYNOP observation(high pressure days over central Europe) DJF 2004/5 DJF 2006/7 M-O diffusion EDMF PBL DJF 2007/8 DJF 2005/6
VOCALS field experiment off Chile GOES12 10.8µm ECMWF 10.8µm 12LT 0LT
Stratocumulus Parameterization Challenges z shall. conv. well mixed sl • cloud top entrainment • numerics • the scheme is active only if the boundary layer is unstable • drizzle • amount/evaporation • cloud regime (stratocumulus/trade cumulus) • open/closed cells • decoupling • interaction between solar warming and drizzle evaporative cooling
stratocumulus to trade cumulus transition criteria entrainment rad. cooling P N P • EIS (Wood and Bretherton, 2006) • static stability: θ700hPa- θsfc < 14K • buoyancy flux integral ratio: N/P > 0.1 EPIC, Oct 2001
Summary • Stratocumulus: important • climate • land temperature • Stratocumulus: simple at a first sight • horizontally uniform (cloud fraction ~100%) • vertically uniform (well-mixed) • Stratocumulus: difficult to parameterize • multiple processes • multiple scales