360 likes | 369 Views
Learn various methods of data collection, understanding ways to use data for decision making, and the importance of sharing your story through data. Case study based on University of North Texas.
E N D
Data,Decisions,and Telling YOUR Story Lindsey K. Fields, M.S., M.Ed., LPC Assistant Director for Residence Life
Goals of this session • Understand various data collection methods and processes • Better understand ways to use data to impact decision making • Learn the importance of sharing YOUR story as data drive decisions within your department
University of North Texas • Just under 38,000 total enrollment • 14 Residence Halls • Approximately 6,300 residents living on-campus • 180 Resident Life Advisor Student Staff • Resident Assistant • Housing Ambassadors • Facilities Assistants • 24 Hall Director Staff • Hall Director, Assistant Hall Director, Graduate Assistant
Assessment can be • Boring • Overwhelming • Intimidating • Time-Consuming
Survey Cycle 1 3 2 Survey Students Take Action Review Results
Step 1 = Survey Students • Quality of Life – • Qualtrics, • October 2nd-23rd, • 4 email reminders, • no student incentive, • option to be anonymous • ACUHO-I Residential Assessment • Qualtrics – led to EBI portal, • April 14-May 15, • one email invite, • no student incentive, • anonymous
ACUHO-I Residential Assessment • Administered in Spring 2015 and Spring 2016 • Measures residents perception of their satisfaction and learning • Allows UNT to “select 6” schools to compare results to, as well as compares us to our Carnegie Classification and all institutions that participate in the survey that year • Spring 2015, N = 575 • Spring 2016, N = 617
Step 2 = Review Results • Results shared with: • Central Housing Staff, • Hall Director Staff, • student staff, • and students • Student Portraits Symposium • Executive Summary to VP for Student Affairs
Factor Analysis allows researchers to investigate concepts that are not easily measured directly by collapsing a large number of variables into a few interpretable underlying factors. What is a Factor Analysis?
Factor analysis helps us determine where we should invest our
ACUHO-I High Impact Factors 2015 2016
ACUHO-I High Impact Factors on Overall Satisfaction 2015 2016
High Impact Factors for Overall Satisfaction
High Impact Factors for Overall Learning
Quality of Life Survey • Administered October 2015 • Measures satisfaction with areas of their residential living experience • Broken down by hall • Administered to 6,170 residents (N) • 1,542 surveys were initiated • n = 1,286 completed (24.99% response rate!)
Overall Satisfaction:Multiple Areas – All Halls Resident Assistants Front Desk Staff Hall Director Staff Programming 1 = Strongly Disagree 3 = Neutral/Neither 5 = Strongly Agree
In statistics, the correlation coefficient r measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables on a scatterplot.The value of r is always between +1 and –1. To interpret its value, see which of the following values your correlation r is closest to:0. No linear relationship+0.30. A weak uphill (positive) linear relationship+0.50. A moderate uphill (positive) relationship+0.70. A strong uphill (positive) linear relationshipExactly +1. A perfect uphill (positive) linear relationship What is a correlation?
RLAs and Hall GPAs .39 correlation Weak positive relationship
Hall Director and Personal Interaction Items & Correlation with Sense of Feeling a Part of a Residence Hall Community
Resident Assistant and Personal Interaction Items & Correlation with Sense of Community
Correlation Let’s look at a scatter plot when it comes to the Correlation with Resident’s sense of belonging to a community and the Average RA score in response to “my RA helps connect me with others.” STRONG CORRELATION of .927 These two items have a STRONG RELATIONSHIP
Step 3 = Take Action What have we done so far? What do we have left to do?
Steps Our Department Has TakenBased on Quality of Life Survey • All Hall Directors had: • Read student comments/concerns • Addressed concerns in-hall • Central Housing Staff & Dining have: • Read all hall averages • Addressed immediate concerns within halls • Begun steps for improvements
Conclusions Drawn • Residents are least satisfied in the area of Hall Director non-disciplinary interactions, and it correlates to their sense of community. • Residents are least satisfied in the area of Resident Assistants helping them connect with other people in the hall, and it correlates to their sense of community. • Our Residents need help in the areas of Personal Interactions and Self-Management as these are High Impact Factors contributing to Overall Learning.
Steps Our Department Has Taken Based on ACUHO-I Residential Assessment • Implement Student Success Meetings • Goal: to have every Hall Director will meet with every FTIC and New Undergraduate Transfer student during the Fall 2016 semester • Guided discussions related to self-management and personal interactions • Community Development Model Changed • From heavy programmatic model to B.A.S.I.C. 2.0 Community Development model based on personal interactions between RA and Resident
How did I walk you through our Story? • Started with descriptive information of our population • Walked you through two survey results • Taught you about Factor Analysis and Correlations • Walked you through how conclusions were drawn • Connected how results/conclusions are being used in the department
Why Storytelling? • Engage your audiences • Connect assessment to their existing knowledge • Provide a structure we can all relate to • Provide charts and ask for descriptive examples (qualitative)
What questions do you have? I challenge you to revisit your assessments: • Does each question have a purpose? • Do you have a plan to reach enough of a representative sample? • Do you need to compare your results to other institutions? • Who needs to know this information and what will THEY do with the results? • Are you telling YOUR story to enough people? Lindsey.Fields @unt.edu Assistant Director for Residence Life