1 / 25

Business Rates: The Latest Developments

Business Rates: The Latest Developments. Neil Benn. The Presentation. Basics of the new scheme Baseline issues / SPARSE campaign Latest DCLG plans What happens next?. What Happens Now. Formulae assess need Deduct what you might raise from council tax Pay the balance as cash

hina
Download Presentation

Business Rates: The Latest Developments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Business Rates:The Latest Developments Neil Benn

  2. The Presentation • Basics of the new scheme • Baseline issues / SPARSE campaign • Latest DCLG plans • What happens next?

  3. What Happens Now • Formulae assess need • Deduct what you might raise from council tax • Pay the balance as cash • Limits on year-to-year changes

  4. What Happens Now • District councils collect rates and send them to Government • Everything else is irrelevant

  5. Basics • Target funding level • Target business rates collection • Target rates > funding – pay tariff • Target rates < funding – receive top-up

  6. Basics • Districts still collect rates • Notionally shared between districts, counties, fire • Funding target • Formulae assess needs • Deduct what you might raise in council tax • Target is the balance • Limit on year-to-year change

  7. SPARSE Campaign • Close gap to urban from 60% to 50% • Changes to EPCS and domiciliary social services • Specific mention in DCLG response

  8. SPARSE Campaign • Our council tax is higher • So: • We are relatively over-providing; or • We are relatively inefficient; or • We are relatively under-funded • Hard evidence is difficult to gather • DCLG is not looking for any

  9. Baseline / Funding Target • Further cuts – 11% on average for 2013-14 • Up to 4% returned through New Homes Bonus • Transfers of function? • Damping • Locked-in for 10 years

  10. New Scheme – Tier Splits Unitary with Fire • Area collects £144m in rates • Assigned 100% = £144m in rates • Funding target £191m • Top-up = £191m - £144m = £47m • Each 1% change in rates is  £1.44m • Which is 0.8% of funding

  11. New Scheme – Tier Splits County without Fire • Area collects £194m in rates • Assigned 20% = £39m in rates • Funding target £105m • Top-up = £105m - £39m = £66m • Each 1% change in rates is  £0.39m • Which is 0.4% of funding

  12. New Scheme – Tier Splits Shire District • Area collects £32m in rates • Assigned 80% = £25m in rates • Funding target £4m • Tariff = £25m - £4m = £21m • Each 1% change in rates is  £0.25m • Which is 5.7% of funding

  13. Levies • To fund a safety net for losers • On “disproportionate gains” • “A 1% increase in rates should cause the same increase in funding everywhere”

  14. Levies • Huge levies on shire districts? • Boosts for shire counties? • How far in arrears for the calculations?

  15. Levies • Authority invests £5m in a scheme to generate £1m p.a. rates • N Warwickshire would keep about £100,000 • Northumberland would keep all £1m

  16. Safety Nets • To protect local services • Based on funding changes since start of scheme • No protection for year-on-year falls

  17. Safety Nets • A 10% safety net on scheme income: • Would restrict Surrey’s cuts to 1.7% • Would restrict Breckland’s cuts to 6.2% • Would restrict Westminster’s cuts to 7.0%

  18. Pooling Arrangements • Minimise risk by pooling with others… • …but also reduces potential gain • Weakens incentive • You pay for others’ failures or bad luck • Why would fast growers want to pool?

  19. What I Like • Incentive to promote business development • The idea of levies and a safety net

  20. What I Don’t Like • Beyond reasonable influence • Randomness • Casino shire districts • Proportionate levy – nonsensical formulation • Proportionate levy – unequal returns

  21. What I Don’t Like • Damping being increased, not phased-out • Safety net based on grant not budgets • Authorities bearing VOA error losses • No incentive to tackle bad debts • Huge transfer of risk

  22. What I Don’t Like • Potential waste / poaching • Enterprise zone effects • Different treatment of fire services

  23. Worries • Delegations of services with little or no cash • Cash flow / other timing issues • Ministers will want to tinker • Perfect storm

  24. What Happens Next? • Further semi-secret discussions • Bill passing through House • Further consultation over summer • Full scheme details in late-autumn • April 2013 start

  25. Business Rates:The Latest Developments Neil Benn 07869 37 35 35 nmbenn@hotmail.com

More Related