1 / 24

Forest Management Special Certification Models

Version:09-02-2008. Forest Management Special Certification Models. Contents. Group Certification. 1. SLIMF Certification. 2. 3. NTFP Certification. 4. Group Certification. Multi-landowner/manager certificate One certificate is issued to group entity

hina
Download Presentation

Forest Management Special Certification Models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Version:09-02-2008 Forest Management Special Certification Models

  2. Contents Group Certification 1 SLIMF Certification 2 3 NTFP Certification 4

  3. Group Certification • Multi-landowner/manager certificate • One certificate is issued to group entity • Sub certificates assigned to group members • Greater Access to certification • Lower cost per member • Expandable certificate

  4. Key Terms Group Manager: Applies for certification, holds certificate, responsible for FSC standards being followed by the group Group Members: Forest owners or clients whose FMU(s) are certified under the group certificate Certificate Scope: Defined Set of Certified Land covered by the group certificate

  5. Some Key Assumptions… All group members shall conform to the FSC certification standards The Group Manager is responsible for ensuring compliance by all members

  6. Group Certification Models CERTIFIED GROUP ENTITY Consulting Forester Forest Management Company Forest Products Company GROUP MEMBER Local government agency or board(working with Group Entity forester) GROUP MEMBER Timberland investment company(working with Group Entity forester) GROUP MEMBER Individual private landowner (working with Group Entity forester)

  7. Group Certification Models CERTIFIED GROUP ENTITY Community Forest Association Cooperative Non-profit GROUP MEMBER Private landowner Uses group entity forestry staff or consulting forester GROUP MEMBER Community forest Government-owned land Uses group entity forestry staff GROUP MEMBER Municipality Government owned land Uses own forestry staff

  8. Key management differnces Warning: If certifiable perfomance on ONE FMU fails, then ALL certified forests in the group could lose their certified status. • Landowners’ or producers’ association or cooperative • All members use same management system • Membership maintains operational control • Membership ensures standards are followed • Forest manager is certified • Manages properties under different ownerships • Must maintain management control of operations and ensure standards met

  9. Group Certification Requirements

  10. Additional Standards for Group Manager • Group manager is “legal entity” • Group manager has sufficient legal and management authority • Qualified Staff • Forest Management System • Administrative Oversight • Contact Person

  11. Additional Standards for Group Certification • Defined Pool of member FMUs • Signed consent forms from participating members • Disclosure of forests not included in the pool (partial certification policy) • Documented Member Requirements • Documented Member & Manager responsibilities • Group Monitoring Procedures • Record keeping of group management documents and activities

  12. An addition to FM Certification Process Group Assessment Process • Scope (certified pool) • Sample size • Sample stratification • Performance levels within group • Internal monitoring by RM/Group • Assessing group function and stability

  13. Assessment Sampling Less than 100 Members: • 1/3 of properties must be visited by an auditor More than 100 Members: • No Fixed percentage • Assessment team must determine (and justify) the # of sites visited in report

  14. Assessment and Audit Stratification Sampling levels must be based on a justified stratification: • Geographic homogeneity(e.g. forest type) • Management homogeneity(e.g. silvicultural systems, management systems, personnel involved in management)  

  15. Audit & Reassessment Sampling During annual surveillance audits & reassessments the number of FMUs visited must be at least half the number visited during the initial assessment.

  16. SLIMF mall...(or) S ow L ntensity I anaged M F orests

  17. SLIMF - KEY FEATURES • Certification is more accessible & affordable for smaller operations • Streamlined Procedures • Reduced Audit Intensity • Less Cost

  18. SLIMF classification

  19. NTFP Non Timber Forest Products All forest products except timber, including other materials obtained from trees such as resin and leaves, as well as any other plant or animal products. FSC-STD-01-002, FSC Glossary of terms, July 2004

  20. NTFP - Evaluation When does management of NTFP need to be evaluated? ALWAYS Auditors must take into account the potential impacts of the harvesting or collection of NTFPs as part of the normal evaluation for compliance of FME with the applicable Forest Stewardship Standard…….

  21. THANK YOU!

More Related