1 / 10

Status of the Current SSMI/S Algorithm

Status of the Current SSMI/S Algorithm. A-priori fixed reference emissivity spectra 100% First-Year (FY) Ice – from observations 100 % Multi-Year (MY) Ice - from observations

hinda
Download Presentation

Status of the Current SSMI/S Algorithm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Status of the Current SSMI/S Algorithm • A-priori fixed reference emissivity spectra • 100% First-Year (FY) Ice – from observations • 100 % Multi-Year (MY) Ice - from observations • 100 Ocean Water (W) - from FASTEM-3 EM model for calm seas and Tskin = 272 K • A-priori emissivity spectra for a range of fractions • Generated using the following expression at each imaging frequency/polarization ελp = εwλpCw + εfyλpCfy + εmyλpCmy and Ct = Cw + Cmy + Cfy where εwλp εfyλp εmyλp are 100% W, FY and MY emissivities • Posteriori retrievals of sea ice concentration • Minimization of Euclidian distance between a-priori (stored in library) and posteriori (retrieved from MIRS) emissivities

  2. Status of the Current SSMI/S Algorithm (con’t) • MIRS EDRs used • Retrieved emissivities at 19, 22, 37 and 92 GHz (V+H) compared with those in the library to find closest match • Retrieved Tskin used as constraint • Results • Statistical inter-comparisons against AMSR-E are under way (Chris Grassotti) – underestimation along edges & closed ice • Underestimation of high sea ice concentration compared to AMSU-MHS – persisted for the entire summer period of 2008 (June – October 2008) • Geophysical noise along coastal pixels due to land influences

  3. More pronounced underestimations observed during mid-Summer (Arctic) SSMI/S AMSU-MHS

  4. Negative bias persists in early Fall 2008 over new ice (not as large, but extensive) SSM/IS Figure 3. Flow diagram of the AMSU-based, new snow-cover extent algorithm. Condition (1) filters out non-scatterers. Conditions (2), (3) and (4) filter out other scattering surfaces such as rain and deserts. Condition (5) represents a new addition to the current operational scheme, and identifies snow-cover surfaces underlying an above-freezing atmosphere that otherwise could be misclassified as rain. In the diagram, TB180 refers to the brightness temperature at 183±3 GHz water vapor absorption channel (Table1, channel 19), and TB54L refers to limb-corrected TB at 53.6 GHz oxygen absorption channel (Table 1, channel 5). Unlike snow-cover, rain signatures that scatter in the 23-150 GHz range often scatter at frequencies in the water vapor band. Here, TB54L is used only as a reference. Figure 3. Flow diagram of the AMSU-based, new snow-cover extent algorithm. Condition (1) filters out non-scatterers. Conditions (2), (3) and (4) filter out other scattering surfaces such as rain and deserts. Condition (5) represents a new addition to the current operational scheme, and identifies snow-cover surfaces underlying an above-freezing atmosphere that otherwise could be misclassified as rain. In the diagram, TB180 refers to the brightness temperature at 183±3 GHz water vapor absorption channel (Table1, channel 19), and TB54L refers to limb-corrected TB at 53.6 GHz oxygen absorption channel (Table 1, channel 5). Unlike snow-cover, rain signatures that scatter in the 23-150 GHz range often scatter at frequencies in the water vapor band. Here, TB54L is used only as a reference. Figure 3. Flow diagram of the AMSU-based, new snow-cover extent algorithm. Condition (1) filters out non-scatterers. Conditions (2), (3) and (4) filter out other scattering surfaces such as rain and deserts. Condition (5) represents a new addition to the current operational scheme, and identifies snow-cover surfaces underlying an above-freezing atmosphere that otherwise could be misclassified as rain. In the diagram, TB180 refers to the brightness temperature at 183±3 GHz water vapor absorption channel (Table1, channel 19), and TB54L refers to limb-corrected TB at 53.6 GHz oxygen absorption channel (Table 1, channel 5). Unlike snow-cover, rain signatures that scatter in the 23-150 GHz range often scatter at frequencies in the water vapor band. Here, TB54L is used only as a reference.

  5. New SSMI/S Retrieval Strategy • Use hybrid technique • Over multi-year ice (predominant in summer), do not use 89 GHz due to increased variability & surface effects • Over multi-year ice, use emissivity and polarization gradients up to 37 GHz as more “stable” radiometric parameters • Over first-year ice, use absolute emissivities in the 19-92 GHz window range as more stable radiometric parameters • Preliminary Results (not final) • Much improved retrievals in Fall 2008 over both closed ice & ice edges • More consistent to AMSU-MHS, superior over peripheral & first-year ice • Geophysical noise along coastlines remains

  6. Inter-comparisons between the current SSMI/S, N18 & Metop-A AMSU-MHS and new SSMI/S – very encouraging results New SSMI/S Current SSMI/S Current Metop-A Current AMSU-MHS Current Metop-A

  7. New SSMI/S Inter-comparison Examples for October 26, 2008 with the Operational North European Analysis Sea Ice Product Analysis (SSMI + NWP + manual intervention) New SSMI/S (microwave only)

  8. Much improved, consistent retrievals over Antartica as well. Appears less noisy than AMSU-MHS New SSMI/S Current SSMI/S Current Metop-A Current NOAA 18

  9. Pending SSMI/S Work and expected remedies • Sea Ice • Improve geophysical noise over coastlines • Use geographical and geophysical constrains to reduce it as much as possible • Make refinements to the algorithm for optimal accuracy based on feed-back from on-going evaluation work • SWE • Improve current algorithm • Use strategies applied to AMSU-MHS • Flag tough SWE areas such as Greenland and Antarctica using geographical constrains

More Related