1 / 27

OMG 402 - Operations Management Spring 1997

OMG 402 - Operations Management Spring 1997. CLASS 6: Process Design and Performance Measurement Harry Groenevelt. Agenda. Recap Basic Queuing Relationships Modeling a Distributed Queue The Impact of Variability ‘Limited Space’ Systems and Performance Measure Trade-offs

hiroko
Download Presentation

OMG 402 - Operations Management Spring 1997

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OMG 402 - Operations ManagementSpring 1997 CLASS 6: Process Design and Performance Measurement Harry Groenevelt

  2. Agenda • Recap • Basic Queuing Relationships • Modeling a Distributed Queue • The Impact of Variability • ‘Limited Space’ Systems and Performance Measure Trade-offs • Capacity Strategy and Queuing Management • Summary of Insights

  3. Recap: Basic Queuing Relationships m customers/hr/server Servers (s) avg. # in system = (avg. # in queue) + (avg. # in service) avg. # in service = (# of servers) * (utilization) avg. time in system = (avg. time in queue) + (avg. service time) … and remember Little’s Law! departures arrivals (l customers/hr) queue system

  4. Recap: Basic Queueing Relationships M/M/1 Queue: • Special service time and inter-arrival time distributions (a ‘memoryless’ process) • Single Server • Average time in system = 1/(m–l) • Average number in system = l /(m-l) = r/(1–r)

  5. Recap: Basic Queuing Relationships M/M/s Queue: • Again, memoryless arrival and service times • ‘s’ servers • Results via QMacros G/G/s Queue: • When arrivals or service times are not of this ‘special’ type • Results via QMacros

  6. Recap: Modeling a Distributed Queue The On-Call Computer Consultant • Customer arrives by telephone. • Information for Queue: appointment book of the consultant • Physical Queue: Customers’ Offices • What is the ‘server’?

  7. Recap: Modeling a Distributed Queue The On-Call Computer Consultant When does service begin and end? • Customer point of view: • Consultant (server) point of view: • For QMacros, service time =

  8. Recap: Impact of variability (G/G/s) Using QMACROS • For arrival process specify: • Arrival Rate • Coefficient of Variation of inter-arrival time distribution (cv(A)) • For service time distribution specify: • Service Rate • Coefficient of Variation of service time distribution (cv(S))

  9. Recap: Impact of variability • Reminder: if X is a random variable with mean m and std. dev s, then its Coefficient of Variation = cv(X) = s / m • For exponential random variables: • Coefficient of Variation = 1 • For deterministic random variables: • Coefficient of Variation = 0

  10. Recap: approximate G/G/1 formula • An approximation for average wait in queue that works well for ‘congested’ systems: Wq(G/G/1) = 0.5 * (cv(A)2+cv(S)2) * Wq(M/M/1) • Use QMacros to analyze G/G/s

  11. Impact of Variability: An Example Check-in for an Operations Management Convention in Morocco Original Physical Arrangement: check-in booths arrivals step off of tour buses from the hotel queue in lobby of convention hall • Typical tasks at check-in: • ask for name and check for registration • look up registration number • check off list • hand over packet • Even with seemingly plenty of booths we observe long queues. Why? departures

  12. A-G H-P Q-Z Impact of Variability: An Example Check-in for an Operations Management Convention in Morocco Revised Arrangement: check-in booths arrivals step off of tour buses from the hotel arrivals check pre-registration information on posted computer printouts departures What are the advantages of this system? What are the disadvantages?

  13. Limited Space Systems M/M/s/N (‘limited space’) system • Same as M/M/s system, except: • Assumes only N positions available • An arriving customer who finds all N positions occupied leaves without waiting and without receiving service Leave Without Service Server 1 Departures N in System? Queue CustomerArrival Server s Departures What systems can be modeled this way?

  14. Limited Space Systems: Performance Measures Fraction Not Served: fraction of arrivals not served because they found all N positions in the system occupied Throughput: the rate at which customers are served by the system Load Factor: arrival rate/total capacity(how is this different from utilization?)

  15. Limited Space Systems: Performance Measures Throughput= Arrival Rate * (1– Fraction Not Served) • All other performance measures (time in system, etc.) are for served customers only, and satisfy all the relationships we’ve seen. • Similar measures for M/M/s/I system with impatient customers.

  16. Modem Farm N trunk lines modem 1 modem 2 modem 3 modem s Terminalserver Switch Router calls may queue for a modem here (all customers ‘arrive’ by same-number dialup) national ISP and Internet Backbone Limited Space Systems Example: Local Internet Service Provider (ISP) (see: Frontiers of Electronic Commerce by Profs. Kalakota and Whinston)

  17. N trunk lines N–s lines lines logged onto s modems (virtual queue) Limited Space System: Local ISP • Each caller uses one trunk line and one modem • Arriving caller waits on a trunk line if all S modems are used • Arriving caller busied out if N trunk lines used

  18. Performance measure trade-offs Consider the system with high utilization (i.e., AOL at peak hours!) As we decrease the number of trunk lines: • What happens to fraction not served (busied out)? • What happens to average wait in queue?

  19. Performance measures trade-off Now hold the number of trunk lines constant and increase arrival rate: 5 100% 4 80% Avg Wait to Log On 3 60% (see scale on the left) Percent Receiving Busy Signals Average Wait to Log On (minutes) 2 40% Fraction Busy Signals (see scale on the right) 1 20% 0 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Arrival Rate (1/min) (28 modems, 35 trunk lines, average session length: 20 minutes)

  20. Performance measures trade-off • As demand increases but capacity does not keep pace: • wait in queue increases but is limited by available space; • percentage busied-out (not served) increases up to 100%. • When load factors are high, customers must go somewhere!

  21. Capacity Strategy: America Online Subscriptions to AOL, 1994-1997 January, 1997 8 7 6 5 December, 1996 (flat-rate accessintroduced) 4 Number of Subscribers (millions) 3 2 1 0 Jun-94 Dec-94 Jun-95 Dec-95 Jun-96 Dec-96 source: Jupiter Communications and the Los Angeles Times

  22. 8 7 6 5 4 Number of Subscribers (millions) 3 2 1 0 Jun-94 Dec-94 Jun-95 Dec-95 Jun-96 Dec-96 Capacity Strategy: Expansionist Modem Capacity Nr of Subscribers

  23. Capacity Strategy: Wait-and-See 8 Nr of Subscribers 7 6 5 4 Modem Capacity Number of Subscribers (millions) 3 2 1 0 Jun-94 Dec-94 Jun-95 Dec-95 Jun-96 Dec-96

  24. Capacity Strategy • What drives ‘expansionist’ vs. ‘wait-and-see’ strategies?

  25. Queuing Management The firm’s view: • Manage demand as well as capacity • Balance cost of service with cost of waiting (“economic optimization” at LL Bean) • Use customer waiting time • co-production • sales

  26. Queuing Management The psychology of queuing:There’s more to a line than its wait (Larson) • perceived waiting time & the environment • justice • information and expectations

  27. Management of Queues:Summary of Insights • High utilization causes congestion, high WIP and long lead times • Variability causes congestion, high WIP and long lead times • Multiple performance measures are often necessary to gauge true performance. Cost must be balanced with service, and the entire customer experience must be managed

More Related