270 likes | 402 Views
The population impact of ART scale-up on the risk of new HIV infection in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa Frank Tanser Presentation at IAS, Kuala Lampur 02 July 2013. Outline. Background ART coverage and risk of HIV acquisition Population viral load . Global ART scale-up.
E N D
The population impact of ART scale-up on the risk of new HIV infection in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaFrank TanserPresentation at IAS, Kuala Lampur02 July 2013
Outline • Background • ART coverage and risk of HIV acquisition • Population viral load
Global ART scale-up South Africa has the worldwide largest absolute number of patients on ART, >1.6 million by some estimates UNAIDS Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic 2012; WHO Universal Access Report 2013; Aaron Motsoaledi 2012
Study setting • Adult HIV prevalence 24% • High levels of unemployment and poverty • Zulu-speaking population • Former homeland under apartheid
The Africa Centre Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies
Adult life expectancy over time 13,060 deaths among 101,286 individuals aged 15 years and older, contributing a total of 651,350 person-years of follow-up time Bor, Herbst, Newell, and BärnighausenScience 2013
HIV incidence by age and sex 2004-2010 Females Males Tanser, Bärnighausen, Newell CROI 2011
Spatial clustering of new HIV infections Tanser et al CROI. Boston, MA; 2011.
Outline • Background • ART coverage and risk of HIV acquisition • Population viral load
Population-based HIV surveillance • Since 2003: Population-based HIV surveillance • Longitudinal, dynamic cohort • Entire adult population living in a contiguous geographical area of 438 km2 under surveillance • Annual rounds • 75% of those observed to be HIV-uninfected subsequently retest • All individuals geo-located Tanser, Hosegood, Bärnighausen et al. International Journal of Epidemiology 2007
ART coverage of all HIV-infected individuals 2004-2011 Tanser, Bärnighausen, Grapsa, Zaidi& Newell Science 2013
Population impact of ART coverage on risk of HIV acquisition (2004-2012) Survival analysis > 17,000 HIV-negative individuals followed-up for HIV acquisition over 60,558 person-years 1,573 HIV sero-conversions Time- (and space-) varying demographic, sexual behavior, economic and geographic controls, including HIV prevalence p=0.171 P<0.0001 p<0.0001 P<0.0001 Adjusted for age, sex, community-level HIV prevalence, urban vs. rural locale, marital status, >1 partner in last 12 months, and household wealth index
Population impact of condom use on risk of HIV acquisition (2005-2011) Adjusted for age, sex, community-level HIV prevalence, urban vs. rural locale, marital status, >1 partner in last 12 months, and household wealth index Tanser et al, Science, 2013
Conclusion • We find continued reductions in risk of acquiring HIV infection with increasing ART coverage in this typical rural sub-Saharan African setting • However, there is evidence of a “reduction saturation” effect (at coverage of >40%) under treatment guidelines of <350 CD4+ cells/µl
Outline • Background • ART coverage and risk of HIV acquisition • Population viral load
Population/Community viral load • Proposed as: • an aggregate measure of the potential for ongoing HIV transmission within a community • as a surveillance measure for monitoring uptake and effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy.
Figure 1 CVC as a measure for assessment of HIV treatment as prevention Miller, Powers, Smith et al Lancet Infectious Diseases 2013
CVC as a measure for assessment of HIV treatment as prevention “ The issue of selection bias [in community viral load] could be addressed with a population-based survey in a clearly defined target population of all people in a community, including those with and without known HIV infection” Miller, Powers, Smith et al Lancet Infectious Diseases 2013
Objectives • Asses whether viral loads in this population are randomly distributed in space or whether high or low viral loads tend to cluster in certain areas • Assess the degree to which different population viral load summary measures highlight known areas of high incidence • (Establish the degree to which different population viral load summary measures predict future risk of new HIV infection in uninfected individuals)
Methods • All 2,456 individuals testing positive in the population-based HIV testing conducted in 2011 • Total number DBS specimens tested was 2,420 (36 specimens excluded due to being insufficient for testing). • Of these, 30% (726) were below the detectable limit of 1550 copies/ml(Viljoen et al, JAIDS 2010)
Viral load distribution Median viral load = 6428 copies per ml
Geometric mean population viral load Copies /ml
Prevalence of unsuppressed viral load Prevalence (%)
Adjusted HIV acquisition hazard by prevalence category Adjusted for age, sex, community-level HIV prevalence, urban vs. rural locale, marital status, >1 partner in last 12 months, and household wealth index
Population prevalence of detectable virus (PPDV) Prevalence(%)
Conclusion • To measure transmission potential of a community, any viral load summary index must take into account the size of the uninfected population • Population prevalence of detectable virus (PPDV) successfully identified known areas of continued high HIV incidence • We propose the PPDV as a simple community-level index of transmission potential
Acknowledgements • The members of the community in Hlabisa sub-district who gave their time to this research • Staff of the Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies and the Hlabisa HIV Care and Treatment Programme • Colleagues at Africa Centre (Marie-Louise Newell, Till Bärnighausen, Tulio de Oliveira,KobusHerbst, Colin Newell, Jacob Bor, JafferZaidi and many more) • Funding • Wellcome Trust (Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies) • National Institutes of Health grants R01 HD058482-01 and 1R01MH083539-01