1 / 20

Garden City Hospital James M. Steinberg, DO

FRACTURES OF THE POSTERIOR WALL OF THE ACETABULUM Michael R. Baumgaertner, MD JAOS January/February 1999. Garden City Hospital James M. Steinberg, DO. Introduction. Most common acetabular fracture Frequently have poor outcomes, often worse than more complex fractures

hisano
Download Presentation

Garden City Hospital James M. Steinberg, DO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FRACTURES OF THE POSTERIOR WALL OF THE ACETABULUMMichael R. Baumgaertner, MDJAOS January/February 1999 Garden City Hospital James M. Steinberg, DO

  2. Introduction • Most common acetabular fracture • Frequently have poor outcomes, often worse than more complex fractures • Epstein’s study of 150 posterior wall fractures; • 88% treated closed did poorly • 37% of those treated open did poorly • Matta and Letournel demonstrated that > 1mm of displacement led to serious joint deterioration

  3. Etiology • Most fractures are result of sudden deceleration of an unrestrained occupant of a MVA • Force is transmitted from the floorboard to the foot or dashboard to knee • As the femoral head dislocates it fractures the posterior wall • Sciatic nerve function should be assessed before and after closed reduction • Neurologic injury occurs in 18-22% of posterior wall fracture dislocations

  4. Classification • Letournel’s Classification: • Type I: fracture line that creates a single posterior fragment • Type II: multi-fragment posterior wall fracture • Type III: single fragment or multi-fragment wall fx with some of the articular surface medial to the primary fracture line impacted into the cancellous bone of the posterior column • Type III fractures are similar to split depression fractures of the tibial plateau

  5. Radiographs • Most acetabular fractures can be recognized on an AP of the pelvis • Radiographic landmarks: posterior rim, anterior rim, tear drop, acetabular roof, iliopectineal line and ilioischial line • Obturator oblique view (rotate pt 45 degrees onto the unaffected side) displays the posterior aspect of the acetabulum • Iliac oblique view ( rotate pt 45 degrees onto the affected side) assesses the posterior column

  6. Computed Tomography • Most valuable tool in assessing posterior acetabular wall fractures • 3mm overlapping sections are required to exclude incarcerated fragments and joint incongruity • Ideal study for identifying posteromedial marginal impaction • Utilized to quantify the amount of posterior wall that remains by comparing to the intact contralateral side

  7. Management • Urgent closed reduction with adequate sedation and muscle relaxation • Assess stability by flexing and adducting the hip • Evaluate sciatic nerve function • Absolute indications for ORIF: • failure of closed reduction • deteriorating sciatic nerve function • incarcerated fragments • femoral neck fractures

  8. Management • Fractures involving 50% or more of the posterior wall are unstable and require ORIF • Fractures involving 20% or less can be managed by close observation and activity restriction • No consensus on fractures that are clinically stable but involve 20-50% of the posterior wall • Closed Management: • hip dislocation precautions until capsular healing • limited wt bearing until evidence of fracture healing • X-rays at 1, 3 ,6, and 12 weeks • CT if evidence of instability

  9. Surgical Treatment • Surgical intervention should be within 72 hours • Maintain hip in mild abduction and external rotation instead of skeletal traction • Kocher-Langenbeck approach is always used for isolated posterior wall acetabular fxs • Approach differs from that of a THA: • anatomic planes are blurred due to hematoma • landmarks may be absent or distorted • viability of the femoral head and wall fragments must be maintained • Sciatic nerve should always be visualized

  10. Kocher-Langenbeck Approach • Skin and fascial incisions are centered at the posterosuperior aspect of the greater troch and extends just distal to the PSIS • Gluteus maximus is split proximally until the inf gluteal nerve and released from its osseous insertion 1 cm from its attachment • Careful dissection of the superficial surface of the quadratus femoris allows identification of the sciatic nerve

  11. Kocher-Langenbeck Approach • Interval between the inferior gemellus and quadratus femoris is identified to avoid injury to the med femoral circumflex artery • Tendons of the piriformis and obturator internus are carefully elevated off the joint capsule • allows for fractured wall fragments to maintain blood supply • retraction of these muscles allows exposure of the retroacetabular surface

  12. Kocher-Langenbeck Approach • Obturator internus tendon can be sutured to the gluteus fascia to create a soft tissue sling to protect the sciatic nerve • Origin of the hamstrings and quadratus femoris can be taken down off the ischium for better inferior exposure • Gluteus minimus is elevated off the capsule and ilium as needed • care must be taken near the superior border of the sciatic notch to avoid injury to the superior gluteal nerve, artery and vein

  13. Kocher-Langenbeck Approach • Anterior and superior exposure is fascilitated by hip abduction • Field can be maintained by Stienmann pin placement into the superolateral ilium

  14. Reduction • Inspect the joint • Wall fragments are rotated back on their capsular attachments • Fracture surfaces are debrided of clot and callus • Schanz screw can be placed in the troch to allow for distraction of the femoral head • Free osteochondral fragments of significant size are marked for orientation for later reconstruction

  15. Reduction • Joint is irrigated and femoral head is reduced • Anatomic reduction is achieved: • if the edge of the intact acetabular articular surface is seen through the fracture plane • articular surface is concentric and perfectly satisfied by the femoral head • Fragments that are marginally impacted must be elevated and supported with bone graft • Concentrically reduced femoral head acts as a template to guide the reduction

  16. Fixation • Typically requires buttress plating • Large single fragments can be stabilized with 3 - 5 lag screws • Helpful to contour the plate on a pelvic model prior to surgery • Leaving the buttress plate slightly underbent aids in reduction • Screws must be directed away from the joint to avoid penetration

  17. Screw Positioning • Bosse: screws placed in any position on the acetabular rim would not violate the joint as long as they are placed in the coronal plane perpendicular to the body • Letournel: Kirschner wires placed tangential to the articular surface under direct vision at the proximal and distal extent of the intact acetabular rim allows a fixed plane of reference • Most recommend placing the buttress plate at least 6-9 mm from the rim and directing screws parallel or posterior to the coronal plane

  18. Postoperative Care • IV antibiotics and DVT prophylaxis • Complete set of pelvic x-rays • CT if any question of quality of reduction • AP of the pelvis 6 and 12 weeks and 12 and 24 months after surgery • Motion restriction for 4-6 weeks (adduction, int rotation, and excessive flexion) • Touch down weight bearing for 6 -8 weeks • Strengthening exercises should start at 6 weeks and continue for at least 6 months

  19. Complications • Hematoma • Infection • Thromboembolism • Sciatic nerve injury • Osteonecrosis • Heterotopic bone formation • Posttraumatic arthrosis

  20. Summary • Posterior hip dislocation with minimal acetabular fractures do well if reduction is prompt and atraumatic • Delay in reduction is usually catastrophic to the joint • Anatomic reduction is achievable in most cases • Displacement as little as 1mm can lead to significant posttraumatic arthrosis

More Related