1 / 10

Sustainable Range Program SRP Support Contract

SRP Support Contract. Firm-fixed price with a base year and 4 option years for a 5 year Period of PerformanceDAMO-TRS sponsored contract instrumentTPIO-Live serves as the COR and administers the contract for DAMO-TRSTwo contracts awarded on 16 Apr 04 CALIBRE W911S0-04-D-0002 and Parsons W911S0-

hoang
Download Presentation

Sustainable Range Program SRP Support Contract

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Sustainable Range Program (SRP) Support Contract

    2. SRP Support Contract Firm-fixed price with a base year and 4 option years for a 5 year Period of Performance DAMO-TRS sponsored contract instrument TPIO-Live serves as the COR and administers the contract for DAMO-TRS Two contracts awarded on 16 Apr 04 – CALIBRE W911S0-04-D-0002 and Parsons W911S0-04-D-0003 Performance Work Statement (PWS)s are competed between the two primes Logical follow-on efforts do NOT have to be re-competed Protest against the contract in May 04, all actions placed on hold, protest withdrew the end of Jul 04.Protest against the contract in May 04, all actions placed on hold, protest withdrew the end of Jul 04.

    3. SRP Support Contract (con’t) Annual ceiling approximately $40M for a total ceiling around $200M Contracting Office is the Northern Region Contracting Center (NRCC), Fort Eustis, VA (Major Kram) All PWS packages must be UNCLASSIFIED No pass thru fees Labor rates have G&A built in MIPRs can be faxed to ATSC/RMD-Robert Randall, (757) 878-5235 DSN 826 Protest against the contract in May 04, all actions placed on hold, protest withdrew the end of Jul 04.Protest against the contract in May 04, all actions placed on hold, protest withdrew the end of Jul 04.

    4. Intended CONUS Users HQDA Army Training Support Center (ATSC) Army Environmental Center (AEC) MACOMs Installations Installation Management Agency (IMA) IMA Regions Protest against the contract in May 04, all actions placed on hold, protest withdrew the end of Jul 04.Protest against the contract in May 04, all actions placed on hold, protest withdrew the end of Jul 04.

    5. Task Areas-The SRP Contract provides for both ranges and training land support Integrated Training Area Management (ITAM): Sustainable Range Awareness (SRA) Training Requirements Integration (TRI) Range and Training Land Assessment (RTLA) Land Rehabilitation and Maintenance (LRAM) Maneuver Area Maintenance Geographic Information System (GIS) Encroachment Mitigation Army Training and Testing Area Carrying Capacity (ATTACC) Land Acquisition Planning Range Safety Range Operations & Maintenance Range Sustainability Munitions Management Targetry Operations & Maintenance Cost Analysis Management Analysis UXO Ordnance Location, Clean-Up & Disposal Automated Tools Creation/Support & Information Technology Support Protest against the contract in May 04, all actions placed on hold, protest withdrew the end of Jul 04.Protest against the contract in May 04, all actions placed on hold, protest withdrew the end of Jul 04.

    6. Basis of Award Technically acceptable/low cost – used normally for work which is not complex and technical and performance risks are minimal; proposals are reviewed to determine if they meet or exceed the requirements; if yes, then award is based on lowest cost Best Value – entails making tradeoffs where a higher cost proposal offers a technically superior supply or service; must identify evaluation factors; such as, past performance, program management support, cost/price information, etc. TPOC, in conjunction with the COR and NRCC, determines bases for award.TPOC, in conjunction with the COR and NRCC, determines bases for award.

    7. SRP Support Contract Process Requesting activity develops the PWS (scope of work), Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE), and sole source justification, if required (Allow yourself approximately 20 days for preparation) PWS and IGCE are sent to TPIO-Live where it undergoes an extensive review to determine if the PWS is within the scope of the umbrella contract and conforms to FAR and NRCC rules and regulations (Approximately 5 days) Any changes required are coordinated with the PWS Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) Requesting activity prepares a MIPR, identifying funds to support PWS, and sends to ATSC, Budget Division NRCC sends Request for Proposal (RFP) to both primes (Allow primes 14 working days to submit proposal) In regard to sole source justification – it is the intent to compete all PWSs to the maximum extent possible; however, if there are compelling reasons why only one prime can perform the work then we write a sole source justification, final decision to sole source remains with the Contracting OfficerIn regard to sole source justification – it is the intent to compete all PWSs to the maximum extent possible; however, if there are compelling reasons why only one prime can perform the work then we write a sole source justification, final decision to sole source remains with the Contracting Officer

    8. Process (con’t) Legal review of a PWS is no longer required, only questionable areas/tasks will require legal review, these should be minimal Primes submit a Execution Plan (EP) and Cost Proposal to NRCC with copy furnished minus the Cost Proposal to TPIO-L EP is reviewed by Technical Evaluation Board (TEB); (Approximately 3 days). TEB can be a formal board, (usually for highly complex, high dollar PWS) or can be an informal board (conducted via email/telephone conference) TEB submits concerns/questions to the COR Primes provide comments/answers back to the COR (Approximately 3-5 days) TEB makes recommendation for an award and provides supporting documentation (Approximately 3 days) NRCC reviews TEB’s packet and makes award Items highlighted in red are new streamline process approved by NRCC and briefed to both primes on 23 Feb 05.Items highlighted in red are new streamline process approved by NRCC and briefed to both primes on 23 Feb 05.

    9. Lessons Learned Familiarize yourself with the contract and TPOC memorandum and immediately notify the COR if contractor is not adhering to award. Primes, immediately notify the COR or NRCC if the Government is asking you to perform work outside the scope of your award. Modifications can be requested as long as the work is within the scope of the PWS. Request MODs thru the COR. If the requirement is for continued performance (base + option years), it must be stated in the PWS. Option years do not have to be re-competed unless the scope changes dramatically.

    10. Lessons Learned (con’t) Understand your roles and responsibilities, if contracting is new to you, recommend attending contracting classes, for example, COR course at ALMC, Ft Lee, VA. Once the RFP goes out, the primes can go directly to the PWS TPOC for technical questions in regard to the scope. However, the TPOC must submit all questions and answers to the COR so they can be sent out to both primes. One Government TPOC (subject matter expert) for each PWS. Ensure PWS is fully coordinated within your command. NO contractor will participate in the evaluation of a PWS. When referencing material within the PWS, make sure the reference is correct.

More Related