1 / 20

Assessing patient safety using the Manchester Patient Safety Culture framework (MaPSaF)

Assessing patient safety using the Manchester Patient Safety Culture framework (MaPSaF). Facilitator: Prof. Dianne Parker University of Manchester and Safety Culture Associates Limited. NHS: Seven Steps to Patient Safety. Step One: Build a safety culture A safety culture is….

hogan
Download Presentation

Assessing patient safety using the Manchester Patient Safety Culture framework (MaPSaF)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessing patient safety using the Manchester Patient Safety Culture framework (MaPSaF) Facilitator: Prof. Dianne Parker University of Manchester and Safety Culture Associates Limited

  2. NHS: Seven Steps to Patient Safety Step One: Build a safety culture A safety culture is…. • A culture where staff have a constant and active awareness of the potential for things to go wrong • A culture that is open and fair, and one that encourages people to speak up about mistakes

  3. Manchester Patient Safety Framework • Originally developed for use in primary care by Manchester University • Based on Ron Westrum’s (1993) theory of organisational safety – “organisational personality” • Tailored from a tool developed for the oil industry and used by Shell Plc. • Now piloted and developed for use in acute, mental health, ambulance settings

  4. Characteristics of the pathological organisation Pathological • Information is hidden • Messengers are “shot” • Responsibilities are shirked • Bridging is discouraged • Failure is covered up • New ideas are actively crushed

  5. Characteristics ofthe bureaucratic organisation Bureaucratic • Information may be ignored • Messengers are tolerated • Responsibility is compartmentalised • Bridging is allowed but neglected • Organisation is just and merciful • New ideas create problems

  6. Characteristics ofthe generative organisation Generative • Information is actively sought • Messengers are trained • Responsibilities are shared • Bridging is rewarded • Failure causes inquiry • New ideas are welcomed

  7. Expanding the framework • Reason (1997) revised and added two further levels • Pathological • Reactive • Calculative or bureaucratic • Proactive • Generative • Additions approved by Westrum (1999)

  8. Levels of maturity with respect to a safety culture E. Risk management is an integral part of everything that we do D. We are always on the alert for risks that might emerge C. We have systems in place to manage all identified risks B. We do something when we have an incident A. Why waste our time on safety? PATHOLOGICAL REACTIVE BUREAUCRATIC PROACTIVE GENERATIVE

  9. Dimensions of safety covered • Overall commitment to quality • Priority given to patient safety • Perceptions of the causes of patient safety incidents and their identification • Investigating patient safety incidents • Organisational learning following patient safety incidents • Communication about safety issues • Personnel management and safety issues • Staff education and training about safety • Team working around safety issues

  10. What can MaPSaF be used for? • To facilitate self-reflection on safety culture maturity of a given healthcare organisation and/or team • To help a team recognise that patient safety is a complex multidimensional concept • To stimulate discussion about the strengths, weaknesses and differences of the patient safety culture in a team, between staff groups or in an organisation • To help understand how an organisation and/or team with a more mature safety culture might look. • To help evaluate any specific intervention to change the safety culture of your organisation and/or team

  11. What MaPSaF is not: • A performance management tool for comparing or benchmarking organisations • A way of apportioning blame if an organisation’s culture is perceived to be not sufficiently mature

  12. Who can MaPSaF be used by? Clinical Governance & Risk Committees Professional Groups Boards Directorates & Specialties Multi-disciplinary Teams Wards & Departments

  13. What is YOUR patient safety culture? Interactive Session Read through the framework - do this on your own

  14. 2. Work in pairs Discuss your perceptions with the person sitting next to you. • Explain why you made the choices you did

  15. Short break We will collate the results from the whole group

  16. 3. Whole Group Discussion • Where did you place yourselves? • Why? • What information did you use to make this decision? • What other information do you need?

  17. Results for Dimensions 1-4

  18. Results for Dimensions 5-9

  19. 4. Action Planning • What are our strengths and weaknesses? • Table discussions of 3-4 key issues • Report back to plenary • Where are we now • Where do we want to get to? • How do we get there? • Who needs to be involved to make it happen? • What next?

  20. Thank you Any Questions?

More Related