170 likes | 352 Views
Coding Procedures (Data Extraction). 6.0. Purpose Identify characteristics that may provide an objective explanation of intervention effects. Provide the reader with a transparent standard of the extracted data. A. Publication Source Journal 2. Dissertation 3.Thesis
E N D
Coding Procedures (Data Extraction) 6.0 Purpose • Identify characteristics that may provide an objective explanation of intervention effects. • Provide the reader with a transparent standard of the extracted data
A. Publication Source • Journal 2. Dissertation 3.Thesis 4. Unpublished Paper 5. Book 6. Other: ________ B. Subject Characteristics (page(s): ____________) Group Pretest Posttest Attrition Age Grade(s) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) Tx: ______ _____ ______ ______ ______ _____ Cp: ______ _____ ______ ______ ______ _____ Co: ______ _____ ______ ______ ______ _____
C. Socioeconomic Status (page(s):___________ • Low 2. Middle 3. Upper • 4. Low-Middle 5. Middle Upper 6. Labeled Mixed • Unclear 8. ___________ 9. NR • Comments:__________________________________
D. Sample Source (page(s)_________) • Public School • 2. Secular Private School • 3. Religious Private School • 4. Other:_________________ • 5. NR • Comments
E. Study Setting (page(s) ______) • Urban 2. Suburban 3. Rural • Geographic Setting: ______________________ • Comments:
F. Author’s Labeling of Participants’ Achievement Levels (page _____) • Average Achieving 2. High Achieving 3. Underachieving • 4. At-Risk 5. Unclear • 6. Other:___________________ 7. NR • G. Race/Ethnicity (page ______) • African American 2. American Indian 3. Asian • 4. Hispanic/Latino 5. White • 6. Other: ____________________ 7. NR
H. Intervention Characteristics • Type of intervention (page __________________) • Total length of intervention program: __________ or NR (page _____) • Length of time PER intervention session:________ or NR (page _____) • Number of sessions: ________ per ________ or NR (page _____) • Describe the intervention(s) intended for delivery to the study groups including how and when it was administered. ______________________________________________
Fidelity of implementation data reported? (page(s)______) • 0=No 1=Yes • If yes, describe the intervention(s) intended for delivery to the study groups including how and when it was administered: • ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ • 7. Intervention implemented as described? (page(s) _____) • 1=No 2=Yes 3= Somewhat 9=NR
J. Design Characteristics • Recruitment Pool (page_____) • Referral 2. Criterion 3. Norm Reference Test • 4. Existing Group 5. Cohort 6. Volunteer • Other ___________________ 9. NR • Research Design Type (pg____) • Randomized Design • Group (Cluster, Place-based) Randomized Design • Quasi-Experiment: Interrupted Time Series Design* • Quasi-Experiment: Regression Discontinuity* • Quasi-Experiment: Nonequivalent Comparison Group Design* • Pre-Experimental: Single Group Pre/Posttest Design* • Single Subject Design* • Other Designs: _____________________________________
K. Assignment Procedures • Subject Assignment (page(s) _____) • Individual Random • Group Random • Individual Match Random • Quasi-random
Was concealment of allocation used as part of the • randomization procedures? • 1=no 2= yes 3=NR • a. If yes, were the allocation procedures concealed from • any of the following people? • Researcher (pg _____) • 2. Participant (pg _____) • 3. Intervener (pg _____) • 4. Assessor (pg _____)
L. Quasi-Experimental Assignment Procedures • (If applicable, otherwise skip to section M) • 1. Was any of the following research design techniques used to equate groups prior to the intervention? • a. Matching on pretest proxy (pg _____) • b. Matching on a pretest (pg _____) • c. Matching on other variables (pg _____) • d. No Matching (pg _____) • 2. Was statistical equating used prior to the intervention? 1=no 2=yes 3=NR • Comments:________________________________________
M. Effect Size Characteristics • Comparisons: Group 1: _________vs. Group 2:_________ • Outcomes __________ __________ ___________ • Groups __1__ _2_ __1__ __2__ __1_ __2__ • Mean _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ • SD _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ • N at Posttest _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ • F value _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ • Chi-square _____ __ ___ _____ _____ _____ ____ • p value _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ • t value _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____
Method of Analysis (pg _____) a. Intention to Treat: b. Treated Participants Only
7.0: Excerpt from Master Coding Guide for Study Coding Code the Fantuzzo Study (7.1)