480 likes | 679 Views
How we can get the most out of NRT: a review and update on nicotine replacement therapy. Produced in association with McNeil Products Limited – the makers of nicorette ®. Dr Hayden McRobbie MB ChB PhD hayden.mcrobbie@inspiringlimited.com. nicotine. 06993.
E N D
How we can get the most out of NRT: a review and update on nicotine replacement therapy Produced in association with McNeil Products Limited – the makers of nicorette® Dr Hayden McRobbieMB ChB PhD hayden.mcrobbie@inspiringlimited.com nicotine 06993 Date of preparation: May 2011. Prescribing Information can be found at the end of this presentation Date of preparation: May 2011 Prescribing Information can be found at the end of the presentation
The risks of smoking are LARGE • Smoking kills • 1 in 2 smokers will die as a direct consequence of smoking1 • Helping people stop smoking is a life-saving intervention • NRT is effective in helping people stop smoking2 1 Doll, R., et al., British Medical Journal 2007;328:1519 2 Stead, L.F., et al., Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008(1): p. CD000146
NRT Is tried and tested • Chewing gum • Skin patches • Nasal spray • Inhalator • Microtab (sublingual tablet) • Lozenges • Mouthspray
Widely used • Is the most widely used medicine for smoking cessation • e.g. 64% of NHS-SSS patients using NRT last year on prescription1 • Typically started when a person stops smoking and a standard dose is used for 8-12 weeks and then stopped 1. The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Statistics on NHS Stop Smoking Services: England, April 2009 - March 2010: NHS, 2009
NRT is effective Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, Mant D, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008(1)
…but is not a magic cure • Despite NRT’s significant effectiveness Versus a placebo, quitting figures are not as high as they could be. • This may in part be due to • Incorrect use • Insufficient use
Unrealistic expectations Incorrect use Not used for long enough Nicotine is often seen as the dangerous element in cigarette smoke Safety concerns can be a barrier to use Reasons for NRT failure • Encouraging compliance is important
Under-dosing? • Depending on patch strength NRT patch may provide less than half the nicotine a smoker receives from their tobacco1 • Even with combination NRT treatment many smokers do not obtain blood nicotine levels comparable with their baseline smoking levels • In a trial of combined nicotine 15mg patch and inhalator, blood nicotine levels were only 60% of that achieved during ad lib smoking at week 62 • Johnstone E, Brown K, Saunders C, Roberts K, Drury M, Walton R, et al. Level of nicotine replacement during a quit-smoking attempt. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6(2):377-9 • Bohadana A, Nilsson F, Rasmussen T, Martinet Y. Nicotine inhaler and nicotine patch as a combination therapy for smoking cessation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(20):3128-34
Nicotine delivery Rates Adapted from Royal College of Physicians, 20001 Nasal • Short half life of nicotine requires smokers to regularly smoke to maintain levels1 • Situations linked to smoking such as at home, watching TV, driving the car and socialising may make it difficult to quit2 • Smokers become accustomed to the regular hand to mouth activity Royal College of Physicians, Nicotine Addiction in Britain, 2000 Van Gucht D, et. al. J BehavTher & Exp Psychiat 2010; 41: 172-177
Standard treatment regimens • For many smokers the standard dosing is sufficient • In others different (higher) doses may be needed • It is also possible that using NRT only from the quit day is not an optimal treatment strategy Benowitz et al (1998) J Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, 287: 958-962
Individualised treatment • There has traditionally been a ‘one size fits all’ approach with dosing of NRT • This is at odds with the disease where people exhibit varying degrees of tobacco dependence • There is very little individualisation of treatment for tobacco dependence as there is in the management of other chronic diseases.
Optimizing treatment • Encouraging compliance with use • Higher NRT dosing • Aiding reduction prior to quitting • Continuing NRT after lapse • Combining NRT with other medicines
Patches • 16hr and 24hr • The Cochrane review has failed to detect a difference in efficacy1 • Sleep disturbance is a recognized symptom of nicotine withdrawal2 • 16hr patch does not add to the insomnia that occurs as a result of nicotine withdrawal3 • Different strengths • Medium and low strengths are for lighter smokers and weaning4 • Skin redness and itchiness is common • Place a new patch on a different site each day4 Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, Mant D, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008(1) Nicotine addiction in Britain: A report of the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physicians. London: Royal college of physicians, 2001. Tonnesen P et al. Eur Resp J 1999; 13:238-246. Invisipatch SPC
Oral products • Gum, microtabs, inhalator, lozenges • Different strengths of gum and lozenges • Higher dose product for more dependent smokers • Nicotine from the inhalator is absorbed from the buccal mucosa (not inhaled) • Best to use these as and when cravings occur • Prepare smokers for the fact that they don’t taste very pleasant (at least initially)
Nasal spray • Fast acting • Good for highly dependent smokers • When first used format can be rejected due to usage experience • Instruct how to use correctly and reassure people that they will get to like it
Nicotine Nasal Spray RR=2.61 (95%CI: 1.52-4.47) Sutherland et al (1992) Lancet 340: 324-329
Fast Acting NRT • Nicotine replacement treatments (NRT) deliver nicotine slowly when compared to nicotine delivered via smoking a cigarette • Faster delivery systems may improve withdrawal relief and abstinence rates
Fast acting formats: Nicotine mouth spray • In an effort to create an effective NRT product to be taken at the moment craving emerges, a nicotine spray for use in the mouth has been developed. • This spray allows a rapid transmucosal uptake of nicotine.
Rapid absorption of nicotine Kraiczi H, et al. Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of nicotine with a novel mouth spray form of nicoitine replacement therapy. Poster POS3-50 presented at SRNT, Feb 16-19th, 2011, Toronto, Canada.
Short and long term efficacy with nicotine mouth spray 1.Tonnesen P, et al. efficacy and safety of a novel nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation. A randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, multi-centre study with a 52 week follow-up. Poster POS2-38 presented at SRNT, Feb 16-19th, 2011, Toronto, Canada. 2. Data on file - 001
Safety and tolerability Most adverse events were mild to moderate2 and similar in type to other oral NRTs1 The majority of hiccups were reported as mild1 No serious drug related adverse events reported2 1 Data on file - 003 2 Tonnesen P, et al. efficacy and safety of a novel nicotine mouth spray in smoking cessation. A randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, multi-centre study with a 52 week follow-up. Poster POS2-38 presented at SRNT, Feb 16-19th, 2011, Toronto, Canada.
Nicotine mouth spray acts fast on cravings 1. Hansson A et al. Craving relief with a novel nicotine mouthspray form of nicotine replacement therapy. Poster POS3-45 presented at SRNT, Feb 16-19th 2011, Toronto, Canada.
Using enough NRT • 1030 smokers who quit for at least 2 weeks in a trial of nicotine lozenges • 28-day continuous abstinence at 6-week follow-up was positively correlated with increased NRT use • Each one additional active lozenge used increased the odds of quitting by 10% (P<0.001) Shiffman. Addiction 2007, 102(5) 809-14
Longer-term use of NRT • Some people may require NRT for longer than 12 weeks • < 10% of patients on oral NRT and <15% on nasal spray use NRT for a 1 year • The chances of long-term use are related to speed of nicotine absorption • Long-term users are mostly smokers whose chance of success would be otherwise small Hajek P, McRobbie H, Gillison F (2007) Preventive Medicine, 44, 230-234
Choosing an NRT product • Explanation of the different products is usually adequate • However one study found that NRT preferences based on explanations changed after sampling1 • NRT sampling may lead to better choice and treatment compliance Schneider at al. NTR (2008), 10, 179-186
How do you decide on the dose? Cigarette consumption is not always a good guide* Most people can start on full strength patches * note: cigarette consumption is used to determine the strength of patch and gum
There is data to show that a higher degree of nicotine replacement with patch is associated with an increase in long term success in smoking cessation1 More highly dependent smokers are more likely to quit when they use high dose gum (4mg) versus lower dose (2mg) gum Similar results are seen with the lozenge3 Higher nicotine dosing • Tønnesen P, et al. Higher dosage nicotine patches increase one-year smoking cessation rates: results from the European CEASE trial. EurRespir J 1999; 13: 238-246 • Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, Mant D, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008(1) • Shiffman S, Dresler CM, Hajek P, Gilburt SJ, Targett DA, Strahs KR. Efficacy of a nicotine lozenge for smoking cessation. Arch Intern Med 2002;162(11):1267-76
Combining NRT products • 6 trials comparing 2 types of NRT with single NRT, and 1 trial comparing 2 types of NRT to no NRT show the advantage of combination use Mechanism of Action: • Higher dose of nicotine • Better control of urges to smoke • Patch - provides background craving relief • Intermittent dosing product - for control of ‘breakthrough craving’ + • Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, Mant D, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008(1)
Patch and nasal spray (118) (119) n=237 * * * Not significant * Significant difference between groups Blondalet al. BMJ 1999
Combination Safety Profile • Combination Therapy is well tolerated in large-scale studies & has a comparable safety profile to monotherapy1-3 • Smokers are adept at titrating their nicotine intake to get the nicotine they need4 “Consider offering a combination of nicotine patches and another form of NRT... To people who show a high level of dependence of nicotine or who have found single forms of NRT inadequate in the past” NICE, PH10 Guidance • Kornitzer et al. Preventative Medicine 1995; 24: 41-47 • Bohadana A et al. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:3128-3134 • Puska et al. Tobacco control1995; 4: 231-235 • Benowitz NL et al. N Engl J Med 1983; 309:139-142
Cut down then stop • Nicotine gum, inhalator, microtab and mouth spray are licensed for use prior to stopping smoking • For smokers not intending to stop immediately • The goal is to reduce cigs-per-day by 50% over up to 6-months • Follow this by stopping smoking
The logic of cut down then stop • 70% of smokers intend to stop smoking at some time, but only 12% are ready to stop in the next month • NRT aids them to cut down smoking and facilitates quitting • Cutting down without NRT may lead to compensatory smoking • Cutting down with NRT can have some positive effects Moore D, Aveyard P, Connock M, Wang D, Fry-Smith A, Barton P. Effectiveness and safety of nicotine replacement therapy assisted reduction to stop smoking: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj 2009;338:b1024
NRT assisted reduction in people who don’t want to quit abruptly • Systematic review of seven RCTs involving 2767 smokers not willing or able to stop abruptly1 • Conducted a study into smoking reduction with smoking cessation as a secondary outcome1 • NRT-assisted reduction results in increased quitting and reduction compared to placebo1 Adapted from EBM, Oct 20092 Moore D, Aveyard P, Connock M, Wang D, Fry-Smith A, Barton P. Effectiveness and safety of nicotine replacement therapy assisted reduction to stop smoking: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj 2009;338:b1024 Therapeutics Review: nicotine replacement therapy as assisted “reduction-to-stop” reduces smoking and sustains abstinence in smokers. EBM Oct 2009 Vol 14 No. 5
NRT as a safer alternative to smoking • New measures to support those smokers who are unwilling or unable to quit tobacco A Smokefree Future. A Comprehensive Tobacco Control Strategy for England. Department of Health. February 2010.
Safer Option to Smoking Strategy Indications for use now include: • To aid smokers wishing to quit • To aid smokers to reduce the amount of cigarettes they smoke prior to quitting • To assist smokers who are unwilling or unable to quit smoking by replacing some cigarettes with NRT licensed for a safer option to smoking Nicorette® Inhalator SPC
Public perception of NRT • US national survey, 3,203 current and former smokers • 66% agreed that ‘NRT is just as harmful as cigarettes’ or were unsure if true • Those who had safety concerns were less likely to use NRT and if used, used less and for a shorter time • Public education is needed Shiffman et al. 2008, Addiction 103, 1371-1378
Conclusions • NRT is effective in helping people to quit smoking • NRT is well tolerated and has a good safety profile • Different options for using NRT to aid smoking cessation are available • Paying attention to the individual needs of smokers may be a way to improve quit rates