1 / 7

NASA’s approach for quiet and efficient subsonic air transportation

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA’s approach for quiet and efficient subsonic air transportation. Fayette Collier, Ph.D., M.B.A. Project Manager Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) Project, NASA. Prepared for Lynne Pickard, FAA August, 2010. www.nasa.gov.

honora
Download Presentation

NASA’s approach for quiet and efficient subsonic air transportation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s approach for quiet and efficient subsonic air transportation Fayette Collier, Ph.D., M.B.A. Project ManagerEnvironmentally Responsible Aviation(ERA) Project, NASA Prepared for Lynne Pickard, FAA August, 2010 www.nasa.gov

  2. N+1 = 2015*** Technology Benefits Relative To a Single Aisle Reference Configuration N+2 = 2020*** Technology Benefits Relative To a Large Twin Aisle Reference Configuration N+3 = 2025*** Technology Benefits CORNERS OF THE TRADE SPACE Noise (cum below Stage 4) -32 dB -42 dB -71 dB LTO NOx Emissions (below CAEP 6) better than -75% -60% -75% Performance: Aircraft Fuel Burn -33% -50%** better than -70% Performance: Field Length -50% exploit metro-plex* concepts -33% ERA Goals, Objectives & System Level Metrics ***Technology Readiness Level for key technologies = 4-6. ERA will undertake a time phased approach, TRL 6 by 2015 for “long-pole” technologies ** RECENTLY UPDATED. Additional gains may be possible through operational improvements * Concepts that enable optimal use of runways at multiple airports within the metropolitan area Over the next 5 years: • Goal – develop and mature technology/advanced aircraft designs that SIMULTANEOUSLY meet community noise, fuel burn, and NOX emission midterm goals as described in the National Aeronautics R & D Plan • Determine potential impact of these aircraft designs and technologies if successfully implemented into the Air Transportation System • Determine potential impact of these technologies on advanced “tube and wing” designs

  3. Technology “Collectors”Assessing Technology Benefits Advanced Tube and Wing Moderate noise and fuel burn reductions possible Hybrid Wing Body Significant noise and fuel burn reductions possible Engine Options: Advanced direct drive Geared Turbofan Open Rotor • Potential ERA airframe and engine technology packages • installed on both traditional and advanced configurations • Fuel burn, noise and emissions are estimated using models developed in • NASA’s standard toolset (NPSS/WATE, FLOPS, ANOPP) which has been • integrated into Ga Tech’s Environmental Design Space (EDS) tool • EDS can feed global tools in AEDT for fleet level global impact estimates • Collaborate between FAA CLEEN and NASA FAP and ISRP

  4. Addressing Fuel Burn – 1 of 2 • N+1 Timeframe (Goal = -33 percent. Reference = B737/CFM56) • Re-engine Only (-20 percent). Less Development • Geared Turbo Fan. Fuel burn and sig. noise reduction • Direct Drive. Fuel burn reduction and minor noise reduction • - Open Rotor. Sig. fuel burn reduction and no noise reduction • Replacement (-33 percent). More Development • New engines as above • With new airframe • Drag reduction through laminar boundary layer flow • Weight reduction through new low weight, damage tolerant structure 4 4

  5. Addressing Fuel Burn - 2 of 2 • N+2 Timeframe (Goal = -50 percent. Reference = B777/GE90) • Re-engine Only (-20 percent). Less Development • Geared Turbo Fan. Fuel burn and sig. noise reduction • Direct Drive. Fuel burn reduction and minor noise reduction • - Open Rotor. Sig. fuel burn reduction and no noise reduction • Replacement Tube and Wing (- 40 percent). More Development • New engines as above • With new airframe • Drag reduction through laminar boundary layer flow • Weight reduction through new low weight, damage tolerant structure • Configuration Change (- 50 percent). Much More Development • New engines as above • With new airframe • Drag reduction through laminar boundary layer flow • Weight reduction through new low weight, damage tolerant structure • Much higher chance to significantly reduce community noise 5 5

  6. NRA – Vehicle Concept/Preliminary Design Study (2010 – 2012) • NASA has released a BROAD solicitation this month to: • Seek up to 4 subsonic transport vehicle concepts capable of simultaneous achievement of the N+2 noise, NOX and fuel burn system level metrics • Develop 15-year technology maturation roadmaps – addressing propulsion and airframe and integration requirements • Determine initial system readiness levels, and plot expected system readiness maturation with execution of the 15-year technology roadmaps • Explore two additional options - • Option 1 – Select up to 2 of subsonic transport vehicle concepts to develop preliminary designs (of sufficient scale to demonstrate goals) • Option 2 – Identify risk reduction testing and assessment programs associated with the scaled vehicles. • Period of performance is 27 months. Available funds = 36.6M

  7. SignOffPage 7 For Internal NASA Use Only

More Related