1 / 6

Psychosis Symptom Rating Scale

Psychosis Symptom Rating Scale. Structure. Modeled after Psychopathy Check List – R 20 “factors” deemed relevant to psychopathy Clinicians rate evidence of factors (0-1-2 scale) Total score, cutoff score structure (various norms) Stimulated many clinical, research studies

Download Presentation

Psychosis Symptom Rating Scale

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Psychosis Symptom Rating Scale

  2. Structure • Modeled after Psychopathy Check List – R • 20 “factors” deemed relevant to psychopathy • Clinicians rate evidence of factors (0-1-2 scale) • Total score, cutoff score structure (various norms) • Stimulated many clinical, research studies • Avoids complexities of testing patient directly • Data taken from records and interview • Longer term evidence; not a “snapshot”

  3. Main Research Questions • Can it reliably differentiate psychotic from non-psychotic patients in “blind” samples (where psychosis is currently diagnosed by clinicians who are in agreement)? • Can it avoid mislabeling non-psychotic deaf individuals with limited or atypical sign language abilities? • Calculate norms and inter-rater reliability

  4. Current Status • Psychosis-Deaf list serve established • psychosis-deaf-subscribe@yahoogroups.com • Literature review conducted • First draft in development • National conference proposed (new funder being pursued)

  5. Next Steps • Complete draft one • Get Psychosis-deaf feedback • Revise to yield first prototype • Test prototype at DWC • Revise prototype • Administer prototype with collaborators • Feedback and revision again • Administer with new collaborator group

  6. Future Research • Useful with undiagnosed patients? • Predictive or reflective of treatment responses? • Useful with populations of various sign language fluency? Oral deaf? H-O-H? • Various normative groups’ performance? • Other…?

More Related