Systems 2020 and AFOSR Status Overview

1. Systems 2020 and AFOSRStatus Overview Barry Boehm, USC Aerospace-USC Technical Interchange November 19, 2010

2. Agenda 1000-1030.  Barry Boehm -- Systems 2020 and AFOSR status overview 1030-1115.  JoAnn Lane/Sue Koolmanojwong/Nupul Kukreja -- Process and cost modeling; requirements negotiation 1115-1200.  Azad Madni/Ann Majchrzak -- Platform-based engineering, collaboration technology, experimental evaluation 1200-1245.  Lunch and Cliff Neuman  -- Cyber security research 1245-1300.  Mike Gruntman -- Space systems modeling 1300-1330.  Aiichiro Nakano -- Parallel programming and multicore exploitation 1330-1415.  Neno Medvidovic/George Edwards -- Architecture-based analysis tools; metadata-based model integration 1415-1500.  Barry Boehm -- General discussion

3. Systems 2020 Strategic Initiative Overview Kristen Baldwin ODDR&E/Systems Engineering13th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering ConferenceSan Diego, CA | October 28, 2010

4. Need for Systems 2020 • Adversary can use commercial technologies and new tactics to rapidly alter the threat to US forces • Increasing uncertainty in future Defense missions & environments • DoD engineering, and business processes not structured for adaptability • Sequential, single step progression from fixed requirements • Individually designed, monolithic systems • Vulnerabilities from global supply chain • New research, tools, pilot efforts needed to determine best methods for building adaptable defense systems

5. Systems 2020Designing DoD Systems for Adaptability Platform Based Engineering Using a common coreplatform to develop many related systems/capabilities Trusted System Design Developing trusted systems from untrusted components Design Disciplines Model Based Engineering Using modeling and simulation for rapid, concurrent, integrated system development and manufacturing Design Framework Capability on Demand Real-time Adaptive Systems Rapidly Reconfigurable Systems Pre-planned Disposable Systems Adaptable DoD Systems

6. Model Based Engineering Framework Designing for Adaptability Early Design Lock In - Design decisions and interactions captured on paper, lost in personnel turnover. - Lack of iterative concept design environment. - Manual integration across product design seams. - Custom manufacturing solutions. Design & Prototype Today Model selected critical subsystems Lots of design – physical prototypes Req & Analysis Product Models Iterative/ Adaptive Process - Entire Life Cycle Stage 1 Segmented Virtual: Concept ModelingProduct Modeling Model Driven Manufacturing - Emergence of open virtual design environment, interoperable tools and design data/artifacts. - Early analysis of PBE and TSD system trades in concept, product, manufacturing models. Concept Models Manufacturing Models Stage 2 Fully Integrated Process Flow: System Concept, Design, Build, Field, Adapt - Robust end-to-end open multi-scale design environment, tools, data, patterns & virtual/physical verification. - Support full system PBE & TSD trades, responding to dynamic threats & trust scenarios. Operational System Operational System AdaptiveTransparent Systems

7. Systems Engineering Gaps and Critical Needs Lead to Critical Needs Summer 2010 Studies Identified deficiencies and gaps in systems engineering Gaps • An integrated framework for concept, design and analysis of systems • Accomodates custom and commercial tools based on open architectures and standards • Common conceptual environment and design tools for seamless interoperability • Capabilities to verify system integrity, promote modularity and re-use, and design for trust • Enhanced multi-scale Mod/Sim tools that support cross domain testing Need for a conceptual design environment SE Research Center S-2020 Study Lack of tools to integrate system modeling capabilities across domains BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON Systems-2020 Study Final Report Booz Allen Hamilton 8/16/2010 Booz Allen Hamilton S-2020 Study Lack of open, virtual, realistic environment for validation, testing and manufacturing Analysis of these reports categorized gaps into 3 areas

8. Overview of S-2020 Path AheadPOM12 5-year budget over $100M FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Research and Development PBE Research MBE Research Other Research Pilot Projects - Demos Pilot-specific R&D (New and Leveraged) Pilot Demonstrations Pilot Demonstrations Pilot Demonstrations Business Processes, Standards, Transition Phase I Phase II Phase III

9. Summary • DDR&E’s Systems 2020 initiative develops the design disciplines and framework to build adaptable Defense systems • Program consists of research, pilot projects and transition efforts to advance key technologies • Platform Based Engineering, Model Based Engineering, Trusted Systems Design • Rapidly reconfigurable systems • Execution performed through partnership with Services, Government, Industry, Academia • We look forward to broad community engagement

10. AFOSR Research Strategy Addresses Technology Horizons Study Priorities • Reduced Air Force operating costs • Highly adaptive autonomous systems • Human performance augmentation • Increased cyber resilience • Precision navigation timing without GPS • Electromagnetic spectrum warfare • Processing-enabled intelligent systems • Directed energy for tactical strike/defense • Next-generation, high-efficiency gas turbine engines • Persistent space situational awareness • Rapidly composable small satellites