1 / 36

Trade Secrets II

Trade Secrets II. Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09. Agenda. Misappropriation “Reasonable precautions” – Rockwell Graphics Improper means: DuPont v. Christopher Confidential relationship: Smith v. Dravo Reverse engineering: Kadant v. Seeley. Rockwell. Facts Posner opinion.

horace
Download Presentation

Trade Secrets II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trade Secrets II Intro to IP – Prof Merges 4.7.09

  2. Agenda • Misappropriation • “Reasonable precautions” – Rockwell Graphics • Improper means: DuPont v. Christopher • Confidential relationship: Smith v. Dravo • Reverse engineering: Kadant v. Seeley

  3. Rockwell • Facts • Posner opinion

  4. Prof/Judge Richard Posner

  5. Goss Graphic Systems, Inc. (formerly Rockwell) designs, manufactures, and markets Web offset printing press systems. The company offers newspaper press systems for newspaper publishers; commercial press systems for brochures, books, etc. It also provides after sales service and replacement parts for its equipment. Founded, 1885, based in Illinois.

  6. Rockwell facts • Piece part drawings • Assembly drawings • Vendors (subcontractors); customers

  7. Elements of a Trade Secret Action • Eligible Subject Matter • Information that derives economic value from being kept secret • Must be secret • Reasonable Precautions to Keep Secret • Misappropriation

  8. Trial Court • Held: Drawings did not contain trade secrets • No “reasonable efforts” to maintain secrecy

  9. Posner opinion • Reviews precautions Rockwell did take • Vault, confidentiality agreements • “The mere fact that Rockwell gave piece part drawings to vendors . . . Did not forfeit trade secret protection” – p. 51

  10. Two conceptions of TS law: p. 51 • Tort-oriented/commercial ethics: deter efforts at “sterile” wealth redistribution – i.e., theft • Encourage inventive activity: incentive, “property”-like orientation

  11. Role of precautions • Shows that info must have been taken wrongfully – evidence of bad acts by defendant • Evidence of real value; shows info is worth protecting through legal system

  12. Rockwell Graphics Share with Confidentiality Don’t Publish/ No Efforts Tell No One Publication Perfect Secrecy No Secrecy “Secrecy Continuum”

  13. Elements of a Trade Secret Action • Eligible Subject Matter • Information that derives economic value from being kept secret • Must be secret • Reasonable Precautions to Keep Secret [P. 36, UTSA; compare Rest. 3d p. 54] • Misappropriation

  14. The handwritten recipe that launched a fast-food dynasty and made Colonel Harland Sanders world famous is locked away at KFC headquarters—its contents so guarded that not even the chain’s top executive knows the ingredients. . . . Only a few people know the recipe and are sworn to secrecy. The employees have access to the recipe because of their roles making sure suppliers and KFC live up to Sanders’ culinary legacy. Two companies supply the herbs and spices, but their knowledge of the recipe is limited. Each supplier formulates only part of the ingredients . . . and neither supplier knows the other’s identity. The Colonel’s own handwritten recipe is tucked away in a safe at KFC headquarters. As a backup, KFC has portions of the recipe locked away in safety deposit boxes at undisclosed places elsewhere around the country.

  15. Disclosure of Trade Secret: P. 58 Publication Revealed when sell product Disclosure by third party Inadvertent disclosure Government-required publication

  16. Improper means • DuPont v. Christopher • Overflight not per se illegal • Was it wrongful?

  17. DuPont • Tests difference between 2 conceptions of TS law mentioned by Posner • Tort/ethics • Property/incentive

  18. DuPont holding • Overflight is “improper means” • TS law in Texas supports “higher standards of commercial morality in the business world”

  19. Confidential Relationship • Smith v. Dravo

  20. Dravo • Classic “squeezeout” case • Interested buyer obtains info from would-be seller; then squeezes that seller out by entering the business/making the product themselves

  21. Confidential relationship • Why necessary? • Secrecy; reasonable precautions: duty • Established here? • Implied duty: Steel Car Co. case, p. 69 • Compare Omnitech p. 70; Rest 3d., p. 71

  22. A Transactional View of Property Rights, 20 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1477 (2005) Robert P. Merges

  23. Reverse Engineering • Kadant v. Seely Machine

  24. Corlew’s work history • Reverse engineering of nozzles and other items • 1.7 years to duplicate?

  25. Restatement of Torts § 757 A trade secret may consist of any formula, pattern, device, or compilation of information which is used in one’s business, and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it. It may be a chemical compound, a process of manufacturing, treating, or preserving materials, a pattern for a machine or other device or a list of customers.

More Related