1 / 16

Focusing X-rays to 1 nm – Requirements and Approaches

Focusing X-rays to 1 nm – Requirements and Approaches. Jörg Maser Center for Nanoscale Materials X-ray Science Division NSLS II Workshop on Stability Apr. 19, 2007. Outline. Overall Considerations and Parameters Critical Specifications for Nanofocusing

hoshiko
Download Presentation

Focusing X-rays to 1 nm – Requirements and Approaches

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Focusing X-rays to 1 nm – Requirements and Approaches Jörg Maser Center for Nanoscale Materials X-ray Science Division NSLS II Workshop on Stability Apr. 19, 2007

  2. Outline • Overall Considerations and Parameters • Critical Specifications for Nanofocusing • Technical Approach to Instrument design • Short notes on Optics:

  3. I) Overall considerations • Goal: reach a spatial resolution of 1 nm • Considerations: • What optics (not discussed here)? • How to measure? • Requirements for positioning/stability • Source • Beamline • Instrument • Assumptions: • Optics exists (distinguish monolithic and non-monolithic optics) • Diffraction-limited focusing required  spatially coherent wavefront • No full-field optics feasible  scanning for DAQ required

  4. Typical nanofocusing parameters for NSLSII • Overall parameters of an NSLSII Nanofocusing Beamline (5 m straight) • Source distance: 50 m • Source size dv(FWHM) 3.8 um • Lateral coherence length at position of focusing optics (svq=l/p): 520 um, E = 10 keV • Focal length: 4.2 mm, E = 10 keV • Depth of focus: DOF = 20 nm Focusing Optics, Specimen Source

  5. II) Source stability, size/position dl ~ /sin a ~ drN a • Size of measured focal spot: d =  ( [dDL2 + (Msv)2 + Msource2]+ BL2+ instrument2) • M: Source magnification; : stability of subsystems • Example: • Multilayer Laue Lens as focusing optics: • drN = 0.9 nm • Msv = 0.28 nm, M = 710-5, M  spatial coherence criterion (1/2, 1/p) • Dsource = 0.1 = 0.16 m, MDsource = 0.01 nm • Total size of focal spot: 0.94 nm (before beamline/instrument stability) spatially coherent wavefront

  6. Source stability, angle • Coherent angle @ 10 keV: • q = 310-5 rad SR angle = 2/(g N) = 1.410-5 rad source divergence, v: y’ • No overfilling in vertical direction; angular fluctuations will directly lead to intensity variations • ’source = 0.1y’:  I/I = 0.5%. • Required stability experiment-dependent • Spectroscopy, dichroism experiments very sensitive • Sufficient for fluorescence imaging • I could be addressed by XBPM in beamline

  7. II) Critical Specifications for Nanofocusing – Overall considerations • How to measure? • Assume we have a suitable specimen << 1 nm features, thickness ~20 nm (t < DOF) • Assume we have an optimized detector/electronics • sr detection, 50% efficiency, high count rate capability: > 106 Hz  1 msec data acquisition time (based on CNM NPI simulations) • Assume 100 pixels for scans • Positioning requirement: • Require mechanical positioning of specimen/object of < 0.5 nm • Drift requirement: • Assume: B = 11021 Ph/s/mr2/mm2/0.1%BW • Line scan: require 1 pixel shift per scan line  drifts < 4 nm/s • 2D scan: Require 10 pixel shift per line  drifts < 4 Å/s

  8. X-ray Fluorescence Imaging (Stefan Vogt, unpublished) Fig. 2.5: Simulation of fluorescence imaging of 5 nm thick test objects of Ti, Cu and W nanoparticles. The diameter of the test objects is 5 nm and 20 nm, respectively. An excitation energy of 12.2 keV is used. Fig. 2.5A and 2.5 B are for an exposure time of 15 msec. A solid angle acceptance of  sr and a detector efficiency of 50% is assumed. The same simulation is shown in linear scale and log scale. Fig. 2.5 C shows the same object for an exposure time of 1.5 seconds (log scale). The position of individual nanoparticles of 5 nm diameters is indicated by blue arrows. A) Assumed: B = 51019 Ph/s/mr2/mm2/.1%BW Coherent Flux: Fcoh= 5109 Photons/s @ 12.2 keV B) C) From CNM Nanoprobe Instrument PDR, June, 2005

  9. Consideration for beamline design • Nonsymmetric source size • Astigmatic beamline design required • Spatial filter  remove source/BL optics motion effects • High position accuracy requirements for beam defining aperture Monochromator Optical Design CNM Nanoprobe Beamline BDA

  10. Critical Components and relevant positioning specifications  << 10-7 rad Instrument  < 1.9 um Source • Lateral stability requirement: << 1 nm • Longitudinal requirement: << 20 nm • Monochromator angular stability (1st vs 2nd crystal):  << 0.1 mrad, DCM at 25 m • Stability source vs instrument: << 3.8 um  << 1 nm Monochromator  << 20 nm

  11. Other considerations • Required Thermal stability • Typical overall dimensions of optics/specimen assembly: 100 mm • Invar:  = 1.610-6 m/m/K •  expansion of 160 nm/K  T < 2.510-3 K • However: significant are only differential drifts • Design using proper geometry can significantly reduce need for temperature stabilization • Tradeoff between temperature stability and air flow/acoustically excited vibrations

  12. Sample EDS III) Technical approach to instrument design: • Overall considerations: • Amplitude of floor vibration: 20 – 30 nm • Provide nanometer positioning accuracy • Stiff design: Aim at in-phase “vibration” of sample and optics • Use of similar components/geometries for “stacks” of positioners • Position encoding and feedback • Conceptual Challenge: • Position sensors cannot be placed close to specimen/zone plate. Typical distance: 10 – 20 mm  careful engineering of optics/specimen support

  13. CNM Hard X-ray Nanoprobe Beamline at the Advanced Photon Source, 26-ID • Hard X-ray Nanoprobe Beamline Nanoprobe Instrument

  14. 6 1 nm 4 2 0 20 10 Time [sec] Hard X-ray Nanoprobe Instrument • CNM/APS design; XRADIA TXM + engineering X-rays Sample Zone plate Flexure-based fine scanning stage Zone plate and specimen Module

  15. Radius Thickness Some considerations on focusing optics Ideal Volume Optics • Desired: Monolithic Optics • Realistic 1 nm optics: non-monolithic approach might be necessary • e.g. 2-components optics: 12 degrees of freedom Currently fabricated at ANL 2D MLL

  16. Summary • Source stability requirements – specifications sufficient for nonofocusing using fluorescence detection • Position stability: 0.1y • Source size stability 0.1y • Beamline stability • Monochromator: Dq << 0.1 mrad • Beamline apertures (e.g. h: D << 20 um). Heatload issues to be considererd • Instrument/source motion: <  • Instrument design/stability • Instrument to source: D <<  • Optics/specimen stability: D << 1 nm (lateral), D < 20 nm (longitudinal)

More Related