330 likes | 483 Views
High Intensity Exercise Training in Clinical Populations. Interval Training. Do you use interval training?. Interval Training. Do you use interval training? PAD?. Interval Training. Do you use interval training? PAD? HF?. Interval Training. Do you use interval training? PAD? HF?
E N D
Interval Training • Do you use interval training?
Interval Training • Do you use interval training? • PAD?
Interval Training • Do you use interval training? • PAD? • HF?
Interval Training • Do you use interval training? • PAD? • HF? • Deconditioned?
Interval training is about 2 things: • Managing energy • Building strength
Interval training Steady state exercise
Interval training Steady state exercise
We’ve Come a Long Way • Strict bedrest – prior to 1950 • Arm chair method - 1952 • Levine • Systematic aerobic exercise - 1957 • Hellerstein • Marathon running for patients - 1973 • Kavanagh • High intensity exercise training - 1973 • Smodlaka
VN Smodlaka: Interval Training in Rehabilitation Medicine Arch Phys Med Rehabil 54: 428-431, 1973 Work/Rest=30s/30s
Washington University School of MedicineEhsani, Hagberg, Holloszy – 1981-1983 • 12-month training study • 10-12, young uncomplicated MI patients • 3 months at 50-70% VO2max • 9 months – intensity increased to 70-80% VO2max, interspersed with 2-3 intervals at 80-90% VO2max, each lasting 2-5 minutes in duration
Katharina Meyer, Ph.D. • Krozingen, Germany • Interval Training in post CABG patients and patients with CHF • 1990’s
K Meyer et al.: Interval vs Continuous Exercise Training After CABGS: A Comparison of Training Induced Acute Reactions with Respect to the Effectiveness of the Exercise MethodsClin Cardiol 13: 851-861, 1990 • Uncomplicated Post (3-4 wk) CABGS Patients • 60s/60s • INT • 0.27--1.19 W/kg • 0.27--1.46 W/kg • 0.27—1.66 W/kg • CONT • 0.77 W/kg • 0.95 W/kg • 1.09 W/kg People got stronger!!!
Interval training is safe: • No adverse events • HIIT was well tolerated • No significant arrythmias or abnormal blood pressure responses • None of the patients developed serious ventricular arrythmias, had an MI, or cardiac arrest during the study
K Meyer et al. Comparison of left ventricular function during interval training vs steady-state exercise training in patients with chronic congestive heart failureAm J Cardiol 82: 1382-1387, 1998 • INT vs CONT • 16 min 30s/60s • 50% of PPO during steep ramp test
Aerobic Interval TrainingWisloff et al., Norway (2007) • Uphill treadmill walking • 10-minute warm-up at 50-60% HRmax • 4, 4-minute intervals at 90-95% HRmax; separated by 3 minutes of active rest • 3-minute cool-down at 50-70% HRmax • Total exercise time of 38 minutes
Aerobic interval training compared to steady state exercise: • Greater increase in aerobic capacity (46 vs. 14%) • 35% increase in ejection fraction • Lower ED and ES volumes • 40% lower BNP levels • Better endothelial dysfunction • Improved QOL
Guiraud et al., Canada (2011) • 10 min warm-up at 50% PPO • 2 sets – 10 min each • - 15 sec at 100% PPO • - 15 sec passive recovery • 4 min passive recovery • between sets • 5 min cool-down
Mayo Clinic (Ray Squires) • 5 min warm-up; RPE 10-11 • 20 minutes steady-state exercise; RPE 12-13 • 4-5 intervals – typically 30 sec/90 seconds; RPE 16-17 (can start at 10-15 sec with longer rest period; can build up to 60 sec/60 sec) • 5 min cool-down • Total exercise time - ~ 40 min
Are their patients who should not perform HIIT? • Basically people who are unstable • Those with orthopedic concerns
High Intensity Exercise Training • Long history • Good safety record • Many ways to do it • Improvement typically better than steady state exercise • Patients seem to enjoy it
ROM Machine All the exercise you need in exactly 4 minutes a day! Manufactured in California since 1990. Price $14,615!
Gibala et al., Canada (2007) • 6-week study • 4-6 “all-out” 30 second bouts, separated by 4 minutes of rest, 3 days per week • 40-60 minutes of cycling at 65% VO2max, 5 days per week • Despite a 10 fold greater energy expenditure with the steady-state exercise (225 vs 2250 kjoules), changes in aerobic capacity were the same for both groups
Meyer et al.: Physical responses to different modes of interval exercise in patients with chronic heart failure—application to exercise trainingEur Heart J 17: 1040-1047, 1996