1 / 16

Enhanced Network Control Plane architectures supporting Cloud Computing applications: GMPLS+/PCE+

Enhanced Network Control Plane architectures supporting Cloud Computing applications: GMPLS+/PCE+. Nicola Ciulli Project Steering Committee On-demand Infrastructure Services Provisioning Workshop, OGF 28, Munich, Mar 15 th 2010. NCP problem statement.

howell
Download Presentation

Enhanced Network Control Plane architectures supporting Cloud Computing applications: GMPLS+/PCE+

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Enhanced Network Control Plane architectures supporting Cloud Computing applications:GMPLS+/PCE+ Nicola Ciulli Project Steering Committee On-demand Infrastructure Services Provisioning Workshop, OGF 28, Munich, Mar 15th2010

  2. NCP problem statement • Grids, cloud computing and SOAs at largerely on a vital commodity: the network • An ever-increasing number of distributed [super-]computing applications • Highly-demanding requirements for dynamicity and flexibility in Net + IT resource control (e.g. automated scaling up/down) • …but their network service(s) still treated as “always-on” • Application layer unable to exploit the automatic control potentialities of the current optical (and not-optical) network technologies • IT resources dynamics completely uncorrelated from the network ones • Common trend to over-provision network services  inefficient resource utilization in the network, above all in case of fault recovery

  3. NCP problem statement (cont’d) • [DEMAND] More and more massive utilisation of these Net+IT services by end-users • [OFFER] A rapid migration from telecommunication networks to global communication infrastructures • Network infrastructure • Computing/storage elements (IT) • Software and tools to control, monitor and manage the Net+IT services • Often virtually composed on top of incumbent providers • … and with a “revolution” in actors’ roles and responsibilities along the value-chain • Infrastructure providers, network operators, virtual network operators, • Service/Content providers, Over the Top (OTTs), etc.

  4. GEYSERS reference model Roles App/Service Providers Application Application Application Interface Network Control Plane (Extended ASON/GMPLS and PCE Control Plane) (virtual) Network Operators GMPLS+/PCE+ GMPLS+/PCE+ Logical Infrastructure Composition Layer Infrastructure Providers Network Infrastructure IT Infrastructure IT Infrastructure Resources IT: storage, computing IT: storage, computing optical infrastructure 4

  5. NIPS: Network+IT Provisioning Service • Beyond a UNI, towards a App-to-Net i/f • Generalized semantics to describe • the functional characteristics of both IT sites and NEs (exported from LICL) • i.e. resourcetypes, capabilities and availabilities • E.g. sites, attached services, capabilities and capacities of network, computing and storage elements, etc. • also the non-functional service characteristics • Workflow descriptions • Interaction properties • Service Level Agreements • Pricing/charging models • etc. a service that allows the provisioning of network and IT resources in a single-step, through a set of seamlessly integrated procedures

  6. Planned features [1] • Provide a single reference point for the Application layer (Network+IT Provisioning Service interface – NIPS) • [downward] e2e dynamic (advance) reservations with differentiated service guarantees (QoS but also resiliency) on a per-user/service basis • [upward] Reporting SLA fulfilment for subsequent workflow adjustments • Capability of dynamic e2e resource composition of Net + IT resources • “One-step” Net+IT resource reservation • Scheduled/advance reservation (various degrees from fully distributed to centralized) • Trusted mechanisms for accessing resources • Coordinated recovery strategies for an overall service resiliency

  7. Planned features [2] • Supporting new connection paradigms, i.e. beyond p2p • assisted unicast (i.e. network quotations about performance and prices of <src, dst> pairs) • restricted anycast (i.e. with a set of equivalent dst in which NCP+ will pick the best one) • full anycast (i.e. dst choice totally delegated to NCP) • Coordinated service provisioning and maintenance through the LICL • Dynamic provisioning, monitoring and recovery functions • Logical infrastructure re-planning based on TE considerations, network & SLA fulfilment benchmarking • Backward compatibility and interoperability with std GMPLS and PCE • ASON/GMPLS (by ITU-T and IETF CCAMP WG) • PCE (by IETF PCE WG) • UNI and E-NNI interfaces (by OIF + possible influences from OGF NSI WG)

  8. Reference deployment scenario PCE+ protocol PCE+ protocol PCE PCE+ x-NNI NIPS UNI PCE+ I-NNI x-NNI NIPS UNI I-NNI I-NNI GMPLS+/PCE+ Region/Area GMPLS+/PCE+ Region/Area PCE+ protocol Standard GMPLS/PCE NCP (inner core) PCE+ x-NNI I-NNI GMPLS+/PCE+ NCP (outer core) GMPLS+/PCE+ Region/Area NIPS UNI

  9. NCP major innovations AAA for net+IT provisioning services GEYSERS enhanced NCP Application dynamics and granularity at the user-network interface (NIPS) • Extended communication paradigms • assisted unicast • restricted anycast • full anycast New service composition dynamicsat the SOA layer BoD services planned + provisioned by the NCP but optionally hocked to the NMSdecision flow Cross-layer service monitoringand escalation of recoveryprocedures Scheduled BoDservices handled by the NCP in a distributed/federated way Energy-efficient network + IT resource routing and provisioning

  10. Main work items for GMPLS+/PCE+ • @Routing plane [GMPLS+/PCE+] • Protocol extensions for Net+IT resource advertisements • NIPS route computation • Procedures for inter-domain NIPS routing • @Signalling plane [GMPLS+] • Protocol extensions for Net+IT resource reservations • Procedures for seamless NIPS signalling • Procedures for coordinated inter-layer recovery and escalations • NIPS interface specification • To let end-user apps or the brokering/scheduling entities on the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) stimulate the GMPLS+ NCP

  11. Reference specs and architectures • ASON/GMPLS core specs • ITU-T SG15 work on ASON and Transport Ethernet • OIF for ASON Network Interfaces (UNI, E-NNI sig+rout.) • IEFT RFCs & I-Ds for • signalling (G.RSVP-TE) • routing (G.OSPF-TE) • recovery mechanisms • support for multiple switching technologies (MRN/MLN) • PCE architecture and inter-PCE comms • OASIS SOA application requirements and framework • OGF: NSI, OCCI?

  12. Expected impacts on SDOs • e.g. by contributing to • NSI-WG • Tentative ISOD WG

  13. Thank you Any questions? Nicola Ciulli, n.ciulli<at>nextworks.it 13

  14. Energy-data awareness and crunching

  15. Starting point of work: prototyping & testing • A number of existing platforms to be extended/used • For GMPLS+/PCE+ (protocol stacks in Linux controllers) • For std GMPLS/PCE (protocol stacks embedded in optical nodes) • … and a solid R&D test-beds background from the team • Telco SME: Nextworks (NCP WP Lead) • Telco manufacturers: ADVA, Alcatel-Lucent Italy • Pan-European Carriers: Interoute • Service Providers: SAP AG • Telecom Operators & NREN: Telefonica I+D, Polish PTT, PSNC • Universities and Research Centers: i2CAT, Univ. Essex, Univ. Amsterdam, Athens Information Technology, Tech. Univ. Braunschweig, IBBT 15

  16. Planned delivery of the major results • [Q1-2011] GMPLS+/PCE+ architecture (high/low level) • [Q1-2012] First prototypes for testbed integration and validations • [Q3-2012] Final prototype releases

More Related