1 / 16

R Cooke RFF 3-7-08

Discussion of Weitzman’s paper (Weitzman, Structural Uncertainty and the Value of Statistical Life in the economics of catastrophic Climate Change). R Cooke RFF 3-7-08. Ramesses II. 1279 BC. Ramesses II 2008 CE. 2008 World net worth $0.000084. 2008 World net worth $15,000,000,000,000,000.

hua
Download Presentation

R Cooke RFF 3-7-08

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Discussion of Weitzman’s paper (Weitzman, Structural Uncertainty and the Value of Statistical Life in the economics of catastrophic Climate Change) R Cooke RFF 3-7-08

  2. Ramesses II. 1279 BC Ramesses II 2008 CE 2008 World net worth $0.000084 2008 World net worth $15,000,000,000,000,000 Using Nordhaus’ empirically calibrated rate of time preference

  3. Take home • Economic values are meaningful relative to a market in which they can be traded (Meaningless propositions are neither true nor false) • Group risk ≠  individual risks • Dependence is more worrisome than fat tails.

  4. Weitzman Thumbnail Consumption period i: Ci = Ci(…. T….); i = 1,2; T=temperature change Amount of present consumption forgone for unit certain consumption in next time period (η> 0) : M(C2) = β C2-η=  if C2 = 0.

  5. If for some value of T, with positive probability, C(… T…) = 0, then E(M(C)) =  Also ‘= ’ if Prob(T > r) doesn’t → 0 fast enough.

  6. Weitzman’s fix Introduce 0 < D(λ) < C: “value of statistical life on earth as we know it” or “value of statistical civilization” “value of statistical civilization = 41”: true, false or meaningless? “...a society trading off a decreased probability of its own catastrophic demise against the cost of lowering the probability of that catastrophe is facing a decision problem conceptually analogous to how people might make private trade-offs between decreased consumption as against a lower probability of their own personally-catastrophic end – which they do all the time” (Weitzman, Structural Uncertainty and the Value of Statistical Life in the economics of catastrophic Climate Change p4)

  7. Climate sensitivity Weitzman(Pareto) Nordhaus

  8. 50 BAU scenarios; 200yrWeitzman Nordhaus

  9. Emissions 300 yrs 50 BAUsWeitzman Nordhaus

  10. 50 Nordhaus BAUs 300 yr

  11. Weitzman 500yrs, 30BAU’s

  12. Nordhaus 500yrs, 30BAU’s

  13. Nordhaus 500yrs, 30BAU’swith moderate dependence in time preference, risk aversion, capital depreciation: Normal Copula

  14. Nordhaus 500yrs, 30BAU’swith moderate dependence in time preference, risk aversion, capital depreciation: Elliptical Copula

  15. Take home • Economic values are meaningful relative to a market in which they can be traded (Meaningless propositions are neither true nor false) • Group risk ≠  individual risks • Dependence is more worrisome than fat tails.

More Related