350 likes | 429 Views
Materia a alta densidad (de SPS y RHIC a LHC) Carlos Pajares Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Multiplicity Parton Saturation Elliptic Flow. sQGP, Perfect Liquid. EoS Transverse Momentum Suppression Charm, J/ Ψ suppression
E N D
Materia a alta densidad(de SPS y RHIC a LHC)Carlos PajaresUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela Multiplicity Parton Saturation Elliptic Flow. sQGP, Perfect Liquid. EoS Transverse Momentum Suppression Charm, J/Ψ suppression Fluctuations (Multiplicity, Transverse momentum, Balance, LONG range) Percolation of Color Sources Color Glass Condensate XXXI Bienal Real Sociedad Española de Física. Granada. Sept. 2007
Energy density versus T/TC. Curve 1-2 quark flavours, curve 2-2 light plus one Heavy flavour and curve 3-3 quark flavours.
MULTIPLICITY Extrapolation From lepton-Nucleon and p-A scaling on At LHC energy gives 9.5, i.e. 1800 charged particles per unit rapidity Linear energy data extrapolation gives 6.5, 1200 charged particles String percolation in between Most of the models over 2500.
SATURATION OF PARTONS Number of gluons. Size gluons Total Area New Scale QS
The whole gluon cascade, (ordered in longitudinal momenta) gives
A more detailed treatment, is the BFKL eq • Grows as a power of the energy (Violation unitarity) • Diffusive behaviour, gluons can go inside non-perturbative region
Small x, interaction among gluon sources BK equation
Solution • At lower x (higher energy) N is large but lower than 1 (solving the unitarity problem) • At small rT, N is small (color transparency) BFKL is OK. • The transition between small rT takes place at a characteristic value rT~1/QS(τ). (solving the infrared diffusion problem) NEW SCALE QS (depends on y an A)
We expect Hydrodynamics perfect fluid result is for full thermalized system and a soft EoS LHC?
Perfect fluid should have scaling properties Limiting fragmentation Centrality dependence
This scaling suggests that the collective flow is at the partonic stage OK with coalescence models
Evidence Perfect fluid (interacting at partonic stage, soft EoS, low viscosity, fast thermalization) scaling properties
Transverse Momentum Suppression Photons in agreement with perturbative QCD Energy loss by medium induced gluon radiation
O.K. with Energy loss dependence on Npart Non photonic electrons Problems: Equally supressed as charged hadrons contrary to predictions (less supressed) Q=14 GeV2/fm
Azimuthal distribution of away-side charged hadrons • For central collisions, suppression • of the back jet • The widths of the back-to-back • peaks are independent of • centrality (for pT (asso c)>6 • and 4<pT<6) Possibilities to look for supersonic jets
Low x2 ~ 0.003 (shadowing region) 0 mb 3 mb Data requires smaller σabs at most 3mb (usually σabs= 4.2 mb) No additional suppression seen at RHIC σab=1mb 3 4
Thews Eur.Phys.J C43, 97 (2005) Grandchamp, Rapp, Brown PRL 92, 212301 (2004) Regeneration models fit the data. They predict, an increase of J/Ψ at LHC. Lattice studies indicate no suppression of J/Ψ at T=TC, only at T≥2TC. Ψ’ and are supressed at Defining SJ/Ψ,Ψ’ the survival probabilities once is substracted the absorption, as 60% J/Ψ are directly produced and 40% J/Ψ come from decays of Ψ’ and
The prediction for LHC is a large suppression of J/Ψ corresponding to the directly produced J/ Ψ. Clear difference at LHC between regeneration and sequential models
number of identified charged pion pairs in The width sensitive to hadronization time. Delayed hadronization narrow balance function (stronger correlation in rapidity for the charged particles) Narrowing of the Balance function with Centrality Caveat: In PyTHIA and other models with short hadronization time are able to describe data. The narrowing is only observed at midrapidity
MULTIPLICITY FLUCTUATIONS Different Extreme Reaction Scenarios NPTarg fluctuations contribute in target hemisphere (most string hadronic models) NPTarg fluctuations contribute in both hemispheres (most statistical models) NPTarg fluctuations contribute in Projectile hemisphere M. Bleicher M. Gazkzicki, M. Gorenstein arXiv:hep-ph/0511058 • Multiplicity fluctuations sensitive to reaction scenario
Reflection, Mixing and Transparency • Significant amount of mixing of particles projectile and target sources
String Hadronic Models Projectile hemisphere HSD, UrQMD: V. Konchakovskyi et al. Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 034902 HIJING: M. Gyulassy, X. N. Wang Comput. Phys. Commun. 83 (1994) 307 Simulation performed by: M. Rybczynski • String hadronic models shown (UrQMD, HSD, HIJING) belong to transparency class • They do not reproduce data on multiplicity fluctuations
PERCOLATION COLOR SOURCES L.Cunqueiro,E.G.Ferreiro,F del Moral,C.P. Results for the scaled variance of negatively charged particles in Pb+Pb collisions at Plab=158 AGeV/c compared to NA49 experimental data. The dashed line corresponds to our results when clustering formation is not included, the continuous line takes into account clustering.
CLUSTERING OF COLOR SOURCES • Color strings are stretched between the projectile and target • Strings = Particle sources: particles are created via sea qq production in • the field of the string • Color strings = Small areas in the transverse space filled with color field • created by the colliding partons • With growing energy and/or atomic number of colliding particles, the • number of sources grows • So the elementary color sources start to overlap, forming clusters, very • much like disk in the 2-dimensional percolation theory • In particular, at a certain critical density, a macroscopic cluster appears, • which marks the percolation phase transition
(N. Armesto et al., PRL77 (96); J.Dias de Deus et al., PLB491 (00); M. Nardi and H. Satz). • How?: Strings fuse forming clusters. At a certain critical density ηc • (central PbPb at SPS, central AgAg at RHIC, central SS at LHC ) a • macroscopic cluster appears which marks the percolation phase transition • (second order, non thermal). • Hypothesis: clusters of overlapping strings are the sources of • particle production, and central multiplicities and transverse momentum • distributions are little affected by rescattering.
LONG RANGE CORRELATIONS • A measurement of such correlations is the backward–forward dispersion • D2FB=<nB nF> - <nB> <nF> • where nB(nF ) is the number of particles in a backward (forward) rapidity • In a superposition of independent sources model, is proportional to • the fluctuations on the number of independent sources (It is assumed • that Forward and backward are defined in such a way that there is a rapidity • window to eliminate short range correlations). • Cluster formation implies a decreasing number of independent sources. • Therefore DBF decreases.
Sometimes, it is a measured with • b in pp increases with energy. In hA increases with A • Clustering of strings implies a suppression of b
Color Glass Condensate As the centrality increases, Qs increases, αs decreases an b increases
Kharzeev, Levin, Satz Particle production in high energy is considered as a gluon production in background classical field. The spectrum becomes thermal with during
If you can not get rid of the noise…. study the noise Penzias and Wilson RHIC II FAIR LHC