1 / 11

Automated Alphabet Reduction Method with Evolutionary Algorithms for Protein Structure Prediction

Automated Alphabet Reduction Method with Evolutionary Algorithms for Protein Structure Prediction. Jaume Bacardit, Michael Stout, Jonathan D. Hirst, Kumara Sastry, Xavier Llorà and Natalio Krasnogor University of Nottingham and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. What is a protein?.

huong
Download Presentation

Automated Alphabet Reduction Method with Evolutionary Algorithms for Protein Structure Prediction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Automated Alphabet Reduction Method with Evolutionary Algorithms for Protein Structure Prediction Jaume Bacardit, Michael Stout, Jonathan D. Hirst, Kumara Sastry, Xavier Llorà and Natalio Krasnogor University of Nottingham and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  2. What is a protein?

  3. Protein Structure Prediction (PSP) • The goal is to predict the (complex) 3D structure (and some sub-features) of a protein from its amino acid sequence (a 1D object) Primary Sequence 3D Structure

  4. Alphabet reduction process and validation Domain (CN, RSA, …) Size = N (<20) Test set Dataset Card=N (<20) Dataset Card=20 ECGA Ensemble of rule sets BioHEL Accuracy Mutual Information

  5. This entry is human competitive because: • G: The result solves a problem of indisputable difficulty in its field (Difficult) • D: The result is publishable in its own right as a new scientific result - independent of the fact that the result was mechanically created (Publishable) • E: The result is equal to or better than the most recent human-created solution to a long-standing problem for which there has been a succession of increasingly better human-created solutions (≥Human) • B: The result is equal to or better than a result that was accepted as a new scientific result at the time when it was published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (Innovative)

  6. G:Difficulty • PSP is, after many decades of research, still one of the main unsolved problems in Science • In the 2006 CASP experiment, one of the best methods (Rosetta@home) used > 3 cpu yrs to predict a single protein • Amino acid sequence is a string drawn from a 20-letter alphabet • Some AAs are similar & could be grouped, reducing the dimensionality of the domain • We can find a new alphabet with much lower cardinality than the AA representation without loosing critical information in the process • We can tailor alphabet reduction automatically to a variety of PSP-related domains

  7. Why is this entry human-competitive? • The initial version of our alphabet reduction process has been accepted in GECCO 2007, in the biological applications track • One of the most famous alphabet reductions is the HP model that reduces AA types to only two: Hydrophobic & Polar (e.g. [Broome & Hecht, 2000]) • Other experts use a broader set of physico-chemical properties to propose reduced alphabets (examples in later slides) • We have improved upon both of the above D:Publish. E:≥Human

  8. B:Innovative • Comparison of our results against other reduced alphabets existing in the literature and human-designed ones, applied to two PSP-related datasets, Coordination Number (CN) and Solvent Accessibility (SA) • Our method produces the best reduced alphabets Alphabets from the literature Expert designed alphabets

  9. Why is this entry better than the other entries? • PSP is a very difficult and very relevant domain • It has been named as Grand Challenge by the USA government [1] • Impact of having better protein structure models are countless • Genetic therapy • Synthesis of drugs for incurable diseases • Improved crops • Environmental remediation • Our contribution is a small but concrete step towards achieving this goal [1] Mathematical Committee on Physical, Engineering Engineering Sciences, Federal Coordinating Council for Science, and Technology. Grand challenges 1993: High performance computing and communications, 1992.

  10. Better than other entries: New understanding of the folding process • Simpler rules obtained by BioHEL • AA alphabet: If AA−4 {F, G, I, L, V,X, Y }, AA−3 {F, G, Q,W}, AA−2 {C,N, P}, AA−1 {A, I, Q, V, Y }, AA  {K}, AA1 {F, I, L,M,N, P, T, V }, AA2 {N, P, Q, S}, AA3 {C, I, L,R,W}, AA4 {A,C, I, L,R, S} then AA is exposed • Reduced alphabet: If AA−4 {1, 3}, AA−3 {1, 3}, AA  {3}, AA1 {1, 3}, AA2 {1}, AA3 {0} then AA is exposed • 0 = ACFHILMVWY, 1 = DEKNPQRST (EK for AA), 3 = X • Unexpected explanations: Alphabet reduction clustered AA types that experts did not expect. Analyzing the data verified that groups were sound

  11. Better than other entries: run-time reduction & conclusions • Alphabet reduction is also beneficial in the short term • We have extrapolated the reduced alphabet to Position-Specific Scoring Matrices (PSSM) • PSSM is the state-of-the-art representation for PSP with orders of magnitude more information than the AA alphabet • Learning time of BioHEL using PSSM has been reduced from 2 weeks to 3 days with only 0.5% accuracy drop • We consider that our entry is the best because it addresses successfully and in many ways a very relevant, important, high profile and timely problem

More Related