290 likes | 411 Views
Decision-making: Dilemmas in Policy Design – Case Study of Forest Practices. Artist: Holly Friesen. Today’s Agenda. Midterm Decision-making theories Case: 6% solution policy design Tools - instrument choice Configuration. Midterm Stats. Average: 64 % Mode: 66 % Median: 66 % Max: 85%
E N D
Decision-making: Dilemmas in Policy Design – Case Study of Forest Practices Artist: Holly Friesen
Today’s Agenda • Midterm • Decision-making theories Case: 6% solution • policy design • Tools - instrument choice • Configuration Sustainable Forest Policy
Midterm Stats Average: 64 % Mode: 66 % Median: 66 % Max: 85% Min: 34 %
Agenda-Setting Policy Formulation Decisionmaking Policy Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Policy Cycle Model
Decisionmaking • Theories: How policy makers decide • Policy Design: What kind of things they decide about – tools Sustainable Forest Policy
Theory I: Rational-Comprehensive Model • clarify objectives, prioritize them • list all alternatives • assess consequences of alternatives • compare alternatives • choose alternative that maximizes/optimizes objectives Sustainable Forest Policy
Rational-Comprehensive Model - Criticisms • Assumes values can be identified and compared • pervasive conflict • result: policy often made without clarifying objectives • Assumes complete information on alternatives, consequences • criticism: • lack of information, understanding, time/resources • result: rational approach impossible or too costly Sustainable Forest Policy
Theory II: IncrementalismCharles Lindblom, “The Science of Muddling Through” • no means-ends distinction • alternative search limited to those closest to status quo • ignores possible consequences • decision rule: “satisfice” • test of good policy: agreement • successive limited comparisons: trial and error learning Sustainable Forest Policy
Incrementalism - critique • policies divisible • errors tolerable • every interest has its watchdog Sustainable Forest Policy
Insights from Incrementalism • Helps to explain • government drift, inertia • inability to think big • difficulty with long term planning • vague policies that postpone conflict resolution Sustainable Forest Policy
D-M Theories: Conclusion • rational model – useful to aspire to, but poor account of real world • Incremental model – shows how governments not so much “stupid” but “constrained” • More feasible when context has: • few actors • good information • stability Sustainable Forest Policy
Today’s Agenda • decision-making theories Case: 6% solution • policy design • Tools - instrument choice • policy design • Tools - instrument choice • Configuration Sustainable Forest Policy
Categories of Forest Policy • Allocation of “Crown” timber-- tenure • Pricing -- stumpage • Rate of harvest – allowable annual cut (AAC) • Land Use – zoning for different values (logging, conservation, etc) • Regulation of harvesting -- Forest Practices • Emergent areas and overlaps (energy, carbon)
Incrementalism in action: The 6% Solution • Forest Practices Code: • NDP government (introduced 1994; in effect 1995) • Significant increase in regulation to protect environmental values • Resulted in business alarm about impact on industry Sustainable Forest Policy
6% (cont) • How should environment and economic criteria be balanced? • rational model: objectives, consequences, decision • optimal balance between environmental and timber objectives • Reality: backward policy-making (Hoberg 2001) • Cabinet directive to limit impact on AAC to 6% • no publicly available explanation or rationale Sustainable Forest Policy
6% (cont) • FPC Timber Supply Analysis (Feb 96) • stated as projection of AAC impacts • remarkable coincidence! Answer: 6% • became policy output, not input • Remains in force today Sustainable Forest Policy
Apportioning 6% by value Sustainable Forest Policy
6% - Policy Strategy towards tradeoffs • when facing harsh tradeoffs, adopt constraints to guide decision making and implementation • advantage: certainty for industry • disadvantage: arbitrariness • incrementalism, not “rational” Sustainable Forest Policy
Today’s Agenda • Decision-making theories Case: 6% solution • policy design • Tools - instrument choice • Configuration Sustainable Forest Policy
Policy Design Toolbox • Policy Instruments • category • Settings • configuration Sustainable Forest Policy
Policy Instruments - Categories • persuasion, education • property rights • spending • taxation • regulation • information • activities • direct provision
Instrument Configuration • formality - guidelines or rules? • transparency • simplicity • congruence: rule varies to match problem
Instrument Configuration • formality - guidelines or rules? • transparency • simplicity • congruence: rule varies to match problem
design challenge:accommodating spatial diversity Objective: congruent, but simple and clear • Vary the rules to account for different circumstances (Prescriptive congruence) • Rely on professional judgment (Professional delegation) • Rely on local plans (Geographical delegation)
New Themes • Because of the challenges on conflict resolution, policy is often made without clarifying objectives • Because of limited resources, rational decision-making is usually not feasible Sustainable Forest Policy
Thursday • Designing policies for protecting environmental values in BC’s forests: the case of forest practices Artist: Holly Friesen Sustainable Forest Policy